Valuing an Index of Sanitation-Related Quality of Life in Urban Mozambique: A Discrete Choice Experiment

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101087
Patrick V. Katana MSc , Neiva Banze MD , Cremildo Manhiça BSc , Catildo Cubai BSc , Lucia Viera MD , Edi Fulai MD , Oliver Cumming MSc , Edna Viegas PhD , Igor Capitine PhD , Ian Ross PhD
{"title":"Valuing an Index of Sanitation-Related Quality of Life in Urban Mozambique: A Discrete Choice Experiment","authors":"Patrick V. Katana MSc ,&nbsp;Neiva Banze MD ,&nbsp;Cremildo Manhiça BSc ,&nbsp;Catildo Cubai BSc ,&nbsp;Lucia Viera MD ,&nbsp;Edi Fulai MD ,&nbsp;Oliver Cumming MSc ,&nbsp;Edna Viegas PhD ,&nbsp;Igor Capitine PhD ,&nbsp;Ian Ross PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>A total of 1.5 billion people live without basic sanitation. A 5-attribute index of sanitation-related quality of life (SanQoL-5) has been applied in 9 countries. SanQoL-5 attributes and their levels require weighting (valuation), with the resulting index ranging from 0 to 1. To date, SanQoL-5 valuation applied simple methods such as rank sum, not robust methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE). We aimed to value SanQoL-5 using a DCE in urban Mozambique.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 601 adults in the cities of Maputo and Dondo, sampling women and men equally. The DCE task was a choice of which was “better” among 2 combinations of SanQoL-5 attribute levels (always, sometimes, never). Each respondent completed 10 tasks and a dominance test. After fitting a mixed logit model, we rescaled coefficients to derive the index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The highest-valued attribute was disgust (“never feel disgusted while using the toilet”) at 0.25. The other attributes had similar values (ranging 0.18-0.19). People valued “sometimes” levels at approximately 60% of “never” levels. Therefore, moving from the middle level to the worst involves a larger decrement than moving from the best to the middle. Mean SanQoL-5 by toilet type followed a gradient with Sustainable Development Goal 6 categories: “open defecation” 0.30, “unimproved” 0.45, “limited” 0.60, and “at least basic” 0.70.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To our knowledge, this is the first DCE-based valuation of any index of sanitation-related quality of life, enabling SanQoL-5 to be used in economic evaluation. Identifying sanitation service transitions associated with the greatest quality of life gains could inform more efficient resource allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 101087"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109925000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

A total of 1.5 billion people live without basic sanitation. A 5-attribute index of sanitation-related quality of life (SanQoL-5) has been applied in 9 countries. SanQoL-5 attributes and their levels require weighting (valuation), with the resulting index ranging from 0 to 1. To date, SanQoL-5 valuation applied simple methods such as rank sum, not robust methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE). We aimed to value SanQoL-5 using a DCE in urban Mozambique.

Methods

We enrolled 601 adults in the cities of Maputo and Dondo, sampling women and men equally. The DCE task was a choice of which was “better” among 2 combinations of SanQoL-5 attribute levels (always, sometimes, never). Each respondent completed 10 tasks and a dominance test. After fitting a mixed logit model, we rescaled coefficients to derive the index.

Results

The highest-valued attribute was disgust (“never feel disgusted while using the toilet”) at 0.25. The other attributes had similar values (ranging 0.18-0.19). People valued “sometimes” levels at approximately 60% of “never” levels. Therefore, moving from the middle level to the worst involves a larger decrement than moving from the best to the middle. Mean SanQoL-5 by toilet type followed a gradient with Sustainable Development Goal 6 categories: “open defecation” 0.30, “unimproved” 0.45, “limited” 0.60, and “at least basic” 0.70.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first DCE-based valuation of any index of sanitation-related quality of life, enabling SanQoL-5 to be used in economic evaluation. Identifying sanitation service transitions associated with the greatest quality of life gains could inform more efficient resource allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Perspective From a Universal Healthcare System Valuing an Index of Sanitation-Related Quality of Life in Urban Mozambique: A Discrete Choice Experiment Effects of Reimbursement Add-On Policies on Trastuzumab and Bevacizumab Biosimilar Adoption in a Japanese Oncology Setting Life With Cystic Fibrosis: The Socioeconomic Impact on Patients and Their Caregivers Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment With Insulin and Insulin Analogs for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1