Value in health regional issues最新文献

Objective: This study aimed to determine stakeholders' decision criteria preferences for formulary decisions of cancer drugs in the Ministry of Health. The secondary objective was to identify the outcome measures of interest for assessment of clinical benefits for cancer drugs.

Methods: A survey questionnaire was administered online and as hard copy using purposive sampling to 32 healthcare facilities providing cancer services and the Formulary Management Branch in the Ministry of Health. Respondents reported whether a criterion "will be considered" and weighted its relative importance on a 5-point scale. The choice of safety and efficacy/effectiveness outcomes were ranked from 1 to 5, and the minimum value of benefit for the efficacy/effectiveness outcome ranked 1 was provided. Trade-offs between survival and quality of life were also explored. Inferential statistics were used to explore difference in responses.

Results: A total of 316 healthcare professionals responded to the survey. The most important criteria for value assessment of cancer drug were safety and effectiveness. Other criteria deemed important were quality of evidence, disease severity, and patient-reported outcomes. There was no difference in the criteria preference and weights across the various respondent groups. Overall survival was the most preferred clinical benefit outcome. Overall, willingness to pay was higher for life-prolonging treatment than treatment that improved quality of life.

Conclusions: This study revealed that a wide range of criteria beyond the traditional decision-making criteria of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are important for value assessment of cancer drugs for the purpose of formulary decisions.

Objectives: Bladder cancer incurs the highest lifetime treatment cost per patient among various cancers. Current guidelines endorse several cisplatin-based regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This cost-utility analysis aimed to compare 2 primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens-dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) and gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC)-for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, providing economic evidence to inform treatment guidelines in Iran.

Methods: A Markov decision model was constructed, incorporating 4 states: after radical cystectomy without recurrence, no radical cystectomy, recurrence, and death over a lifetime horizon. Clinical outcomes were derived from the VESPER (French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group and French Association of Urology V05) phase 3 randomized controlled trial, whereas costs were obtained from local Iranian data. The main result involved determining an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio within the simulated population, with a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1656 USD (equivalent to Iran's gross domestic product per capita in 2023). Costs and benefits were discounted at 5.8% per annum, and probabilistic and univariate deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: From the perspective of the Iranian healthcare payer, 6 cycles of dd-MVAC yielded 0.02 greater quality-adjusted life-years compared with 4 cycles of GC, resulting in a cost saving of 1 173 491 USD and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -78 708 870. Consequently, dd-MVAC emerged as the dominant option over a lifetime horizon (23 years). The model proved most sensitive to variations in recurrence and toxicity probabilities during treatment.

Conclusions: Based on this study's results, dd-MVAC represents a cost-saving treatment regimen per patient in the Iranian health system compared with GC, with superior utility.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the costs and factors associated with the judicialization of medicines for the municipal Unified Health System in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2017 to 2021.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data provided by the Municipal Health Department of Campinas and the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo.

Results: The sample comprised 506 medicines (322 active substances) and 493 legal cases. Of the US$9.270 million disbursed, 67.3% were allocated to purchase medicines. On average, 28.8% of the pharmaceuticals were listed on the National List of Essential Medicines (Rename), of which 52.3% were listed in the specialized component. Expenditures on nonincorporated and oncological medicines accounted for 76% of the total value. Acquisition of brand-specific medicines was predominant (53.7%), of which 75.5% had therapeutic equivalents. ABC curve shows that only 28 active substances corresponded to 79.8% of the expenses incurred to serve 573 plaintiffs. Four factors, when present in legal actions, prevented the rational use of public resources: assumption of responsibilities of other federative entities, acquisition of medicines not incorporated in Rename and oncological drugs, trademark determination, and the requirement to supply the medicine for an indefinite period. Costs associated with these factors caused an increase in expenditure, even with a decrease in legal demands filed against the municipality.

Conclusions: Judicialization of medicines in Campinas from 2017 to 2021 required an allocation of US$6.2 million, aimed at treating only 0.068% of the population. Associated factors include legal requirements and internal management challenges that have increased costs.