Simultaneous adoption of catastrophic risk management tools in aquaculture: A study of floodplain areas of Bangladesh

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105284
K M Mehedi Adnan , Zhao Xicang , Swati Anindita Sarker , Wu Jiying , Md. Shah Alamgir
{"title":"Simultaneous adoption of catastrophic risk management tools in aquaculture: A study of floodplain areas of Bangladesh","authors":"K M Mehedi Adnan ,&nbsp;Zhao Xicang ,&nbsp;Swati Anindita Sarker ,&nbsp;Wu Jiying ,&nbsp;Md. Shah Alamgir","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在水产养殖中同时采用灾难性风险管理工具:对孟加拉国洪泛平原地区的研究
水产养殖被认为是高风险行业,其产量的变化严重阻碍了有效风险管理战略的制定和实施。在全球范围内,农场通常同时采用多种风险管理方法。然而,以往的研究在很大程度上忽略了采用风险管理技术的决定与同时实施这些技术的可行性之间的关系。本研究采用双变量和多项probit模型分析了300家水产养殖生产者利用农场管理和垂直整合来降低农场风险的决策效果。该研究强调了不同风险管理采用决策之间潜在的相互联系。结果表明,垂直整合决策与农场管理实施相关,提示农民应关注各种风险管理技术,以最大限度地降低风险。此外,研究结果强调了年龄、家庭收入、教育程度、推广联系、土地所有权状况、疾病和洪水风险以及农民的风险规避等因素在影响采用农场管理和垂直整合以降低风险方面的重要性。probit方法在标准风险管理工具中的应用提供了更深入的见解,帮助决策者制定更有效的风险管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Assessing climate-driven storm impacts on geographically isolated communities and underserved vulnerable populations Shaking urban crime: Earthquakes, stress and crime in neighbourhoods A novel dynamic disaster risk assessment of Urban Built Environments: An application to flood and earthquake Early-warning engineering for corridor vulnerability: A remote sensing threshold model for disaster risk reduction in Tanzania Tribal hazard mitigation planning pathways: A comparative content analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1