K M Mehedi Adnan , Zhao Xicang , Swati Anindita Sarker , Wu Jiying , Md. Shah Alamgir
{"title":"Simultaneous adoption of catastrophic risk management tools in aquaculture: A study of floodplain areas of Bangladesh","authors":"K M Mehedi Adnan , Zhao Xicang , Swati Anindita Sarker , Wu Jiying , Md. Shah Alamgir","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.