Simultaneous adoption of catastrophic risk management tools in aquaculture: A study of floodplain areas of Bangladesh

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105284
K M Mehedi Adnan , Zhao Xicang , Swati Anindita Sarker , Wu Jiying , Md. Shah Alamgir
{"title":"Simultaneous adoption of catastrophic risk management tools in aquaculture: A study of floodplain areas of Bangladesh","authors":"K M Mehedi Adnan ,&nbsp;Zhao Xicang ,&nbsp;Swati Anindita Sarker ,&nbsp;Wu Jiying ,&nbsp;Md. Shah Alamgir","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 105284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925001086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aquaculture is considered a high-risk industry, with production variability significantly hindering the development and implementation of effective risk management strategies. Globally, farms commonly employ multiple risk management approaches simultaneously. However, previous research has largely overlooked the relationship between the decision to adopt risk management techniques and the feasibility of implementing these technologies concurrently. This study uses bivariate and multinomial probit models to analyze the effects of 300 aquaculture producers' decisions to utilize farm management and vertical integration to mitigate farm risks. The research highlights the potential interconnections between different risk management adoption decisions. The results indicate that decisions regarding vertical integration and farm management implementation are related, suggesting that farmers should focus on a variety of risk management techniques to minimize risks. Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of factors such as age, household income, education, extension contact, land ownership status, disease and flood risks, and farmers' risk aversion in influencing the adoption of farm management and vertical integration for risk reduction. The application of probit approaches to standard risk-management tools provides deeper insights, aiding policymakers in developing more effective risk management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Fire alone can save our Clan: Implications of resilience through disaster-related learning using the Warriors children's literature series Study on fine early warning of maize high wind lodging disaster risk in Jilin Province, China Drought impacts and community adaptation: Perspectives on the 2020–2023 drought in East Africa A system for community lifeline and resource optimization in disaster management and planning Flashpoints between wildfire recovery & mitigation in northern California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1