Exploring the market and community acceptance of seasonal thermal energy storage technologies: Insights from a population survey in Switzerland

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103954
Rebeka Sträter , Richard Lüchinger , Guillaume Zumofen
{"title":"Exploring the market and community acceptance of seasonal thermal energy storage technologies: Insights from a population survey in Switzerland","authors":"Rebeka Sträter ,&nbsp;Richard Lüchinger ,&nbsp;Guillaume Zumofen","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seasonal thermal energy storage (STES) is a key technology to address the seasonal intermittency of renewable energy sources and decarbonise the energy sector. Different STES solutions are market-ready or being developed, resulting in a diverse technology landscape. While this diversity adds complexity, it also presents a valuable feature that can support STES diffusion by offering adaptable solutions for diverse needs and preferences. We add a social acceptance lens to STES and examine how laypeople of the general public evaluate different STES technologies at a building and district level. We do so in a proactive manner, i.e., investigating technology acceptance before its (widespread) popularity and diffusion, to capture and compare initial acceptance patterns of STES technologies and derive potential implications of STES and its technological diversity. Empirically, we analyse and present novel cross-section survey data collected in 2022 and 2023 among Swiss residents (<em>N</em> = 589), capturing market and community acceptance of five different STES technologies. Our results suggest that STES technologies exhibit different ‘starting points’ regarding acceptance, with borehole, water and, to a certain extent, latent heat energy storage technologies reaching higher acceptance than ice and thermochemical energy storage technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103954"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seasonal thermal energy storage (STES) is a key technology to address the seasonal intermittency of renewable energy sources and decarbonise the energy sector. Different STES solutions are market-ready or being developed, resulting in a diverse technology landscape. While this diversity adds complexity, it also presents a valuable feature that can support STES diffusion by offering adaptable solutions for diverse needs and preferences. We add a social acceptance lens to STES and examine how laypeople of the general public evaluate different STES technologies at a building and district level. We do so in a proactive manner, i.e., investigating technology acceptance before its (widespread) popularity and diffusion, to capture and compare initial acceptance patterns of STES technologies and derive potential implications of STES and its technological diversity. Empirically, we analyse and present novel cross-section survey data collected in 2022 and 2023 among Swiss residents (N = 589), capturing market and community acceptance of five different STES technologies. Our results suggest that STES technologies exhibit different ‘starting points’ regarding acceptance, with borehole, water and, to a certain extent, latent heat energy storage technologies reaching higher acceptance than ice and thermochemical energy storage technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索季节性热能储存技术的市场和社区接受度:来自瑞士人口调查的见解
季节性热能储存(STES)是解决可再生能源季节性间歇性和能源部门脱碳的关键技术。不同的STES解决方案已准备就绪或正在开发中,从而形成了多样化的技术格局。虽然这种多样性增加了复杂性,但它也提供了一个有价值的特性,可以通过为不同的需求和偏好提供适应性解决方案来支持STES的传播。我们为STES增加了社会接受的视角,并研究了普通公众如何在建筑和地区层面评估不同的STES技术。我们以积极主动的方式这样做,即在技术(广泛)流行和扩散之前调查技术接受程度,以捕捉和比较STES技术的初始接受模式,并得出STES及其技术多样性的潜在影响。从经验上看,我们分析并呈现了2022年和2023年在瑞士居民(N = 589)中收集的新颖横断面调查数据,捕捉了市场和社区对五种不同STES技术的接受程度。我们的研究结果表明,STES技术在接受度方面表现出不同的“起点”,钻孔、水和潜热储能技术在一定程度上比冰和热化学储能技术获得更高的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Developing a capabilities-based low carbon transition framework: Insights from an empirical study of home improvement practices in Australia State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China Uncertainties and anticipated disturbances as drivers of tenant relocation in Swedish housing renovation Fission and friction: A systematic review of individual-level determinants of attitudes toward nuclear energy in advanced economies An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1