Understanding the effect of built-up and green spaces upon air quality at multiple spatial scales: A systematic literature review

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105304
Chenling Wu , Ahmed Hazem Eldesoky , Eugenio Morello
{"title":"Understanding the effect of built-up and green spaces upon air quality at multiple spatial scales: A systematic literature review","authors":"Chenling Wu ,&nbsp;Ahmed Hazem Eldesoky ,&nbsp;Eugenio Morello","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how to design and plan built-up and green spaces in cities is essential for achieving optimal outdoor air quality. While several studies have investigated how different indicators of built-up and green spaces impact air quality across various spatial scales (macro, meso, and micro), the findings and evidence remain fragmented and largely inaccessible to urban designers, planners, and policymakers. To bridge this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of 61 peer-reviewed publications to: (1) provide an overview of the literature addressing the impacts of built-up and green spaces on air quality, including key areas of investigation (emission, dispersion, deposition, exposure, etc.), the pollutants studied (particulates, gases), and the quantitative methods used (numerical, physical, and empirical models); (2) develop a taxonomy of built-up and green space indicators that influence air quality at different spatial scales, such as urban canyon aspect ratios, vegetation size, and land-use and land-cover compositions; and (3) synthesize quantitative evidence on how these indicators affect air quality (positively, negatively, insignificantly, or variously) across scales. The taxonomy and synthesized evidence offer actionable, evidence-based insights for urban planning, design, and policy to improve air quality at different spatial scales. Additionally, the review highlights several under-explored areas for future air quality research, such as the impact of vegetation configuration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105304"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how to design and plan built-up and green spaces in cities is essential for achieving optimal outdoor air quality. While several studies have investigated how different indicators of built-up and green spaces impact air quality across various spatial scales (macro, meso, and micro), the findings and evidence remain fragmented and largely inaccessible to urban designers, planners, and policymakers. To bridge this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of 61 peer-reviewed publications to: (1) provide an overview of the literature addressing the impacts of built-up and green spaces on air quality, including key areas of investigation (emission, dispersion, deposition, exposure, etc.), the pollutants studied (particulates, gases), and the quantitative methods used (numerical, physical, and empirical models); (2) develop a taxonomy of built-up and green space indicators that influence air quality at different spatial scales, such as urban canyon aspect ratios, vegetation size, and land-use and land-cover compositions; and (3) synthesize quantitative evidence on how these indicators affect air quality (positively, negatively, insignificantly, or variously) across scales. The taxonomy and synthesized evidence offer actionable, evidence-based insights for urban planning, design, and policy to improve air quality at different spatial scales. Additionally, the review highlights several under-explored areas for future air quality research, such as the impact of vegetation configuration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Substitution effects and spatial factors in the social demand for landscape aesthetics in agroecosystems Watching nature through the window cannot be overlooked! Nexus between green window view, physical activity intention, and intensity among older adults Understanding the effect of built-up and green spaces upon air quality at multiple spatial scales: A systematic literature review Assessing recreationists’ preferences of the landscape and species using crowdsourced images and machine learning Assessing accessibility to peri-urban parks considering supply, demand, and traffic conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1