Thermal-hydraulic analysis of sequential disposal scenarios in a spent nuclear fuel repository

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Progress in Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105662
Samuel Park , Pilhyeon Ju , Taehoon Park , Richard I. Foster , GyoSoon Kim , Sungyeol Choi
{"title":"Thermal-hydraulic analysis of sequential disposal scenarios in a spent nuclear fuel repository","authors":"Samuel Park ,&nbsp;Pilhyeon Ju ,&nbsp;Taehoon Park ,&nbsp;Richard I. Foster ,&nbsp;GyoSoon Kim ,&nbsp;Sungyeol Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2025.105662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In order to address issues related to Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF), nations using nuclear energy have considered disposal of SNF in a Deep Geological Repository (DGR) located 500m below ground as most promising option. The Korean government has considered the multi-barrier disposal concept developed by Finland and Sweden and has developed a Korean Reference disposal System (KRS). The main consideration of KRS is how effectively it can isolate SNF from ecosystem, including considerations for thermal, mechanical and material degradations such as illitization of bentonite and canister corrosion. Among these criteria, temperature plays a significant role in maintaining repository integrity, influencing both mechanical and material degradation behavior. Consequently, various trials, including analytical and numerical solutions, have been employed to estimate temperature evolutions. However, a significant temperature difference between the analytical and numerical solutions arises due to the simulation region. Specifically, the analytical solution considers a multi-canister geometry, while current numerical solutions only account for a single-canister due to computational cost. As a result, the single canister model does not accurately reflect heat flux from the adjacent canisters. In this study, a quantitative comparison between analytical and numerical solutions using multi-canister geometries was conducted, and the results showed that the analytical and numerical solutions exhibit similar results. Additionally, four different SNF disposal methods were investigated to identify the optimized disposal method in terms of peak temperature. According to the results, it is suggested that the plop-plop method is the optimized disposal method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 105662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197025000605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to address issues related to Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF), nations using nuclear energy have considered disposal of SNF in a Deep Geological Repository (DGR) located 500m below ground as most promising option. The Korean government has considered the multi-barrier disposal concept developed by Finland and Sweden and has developed a Korean Reference disposal System (KRS). The main consideration of KRS is how effectively it can isolate SNF from ecosystem, including considerations for thermal, mechanical and material degradations such as illitization of bentonite and canister corrosion. Among these criteria, temperature plays a significant role in maintaining repository integrity, influencing both mechanical and material degradation behavior. Consequently, various trials, including analytical and numerical solutions, have been employed to estimate temperature evolutions. However, a significant temperature difference between the analytical and numerical solutions arises due to the simulation region. Specifically, the analytical solution considers a multi-canister geometry, while current numerical solutions only account for a single-canister due to computational cost. As a result, the single canister model does not accurately reflect heat flux from the adjacent canisters. In this study, a quantitative comparison between analytical and numerical solutions using multi-canister geometries was conducted, and the results showed that the analytical and numerical solutions exhibit similar results. Additionally, four different SNF disposal methods were investigated to identify the optimized disposal method in terms of peak temperature. According to the results, it is suggested that the plop-plop method is the optimized disposal method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study of the dominant frequency of pressure oscillations and condensing pattern in vertically upward steam bubbles jets under rolling conditions Thermal-hydraulic performance of natural circulation system with narrow rectangular channel under heaving condition based on 1D/3D coupling analysis An overview of the prediction methods for the heat transfer of supercritical fluids Thermal-hydraulic analysis of sequential disposal scenarios in a spent nuclear fuel repository Development and validation of a subchannel analysis code for PWRs based on the two-phase and three-field model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1