User-enabled installation qualification method for laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) machine scanner subsystem

IF 11.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Additive manufacturing Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2025.104694
B.L. Valadez Mesta , H.C. Taylor , J. Mireles , D. Borup , R.B. Wicker
{"title":"User-enabled installation qualification method for laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) machine scanner subsystem","authors":"B.L. Valadez Mesta ,&nbsp;H.C. Taylor ,&nbsp;J. Mireles ,&nbsp;D. Borup ,&nbsp;R.B. Wicker","doi":"10.1016/j.addma.2025.104694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Installation qualification for laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) machines is challenging due to the extensive labor, time, and financial costs required by current standards. These standards demand long builds, expensive equipment, and specialized expertise, primarily focusing on mechanical properties, which complicates the analysis of subsystem performance where attention may be required. Consequently, this makes machine installation qualification both inaccessible and inconsistent for typical PBF-LB/M users. This study presents a new methodology for installation qualification of PBF-LB/M scanner subsystem hardware and control software that addresses these challenges, empowering users to qualify their systems. A plate melt setup using a commercially available 25.4-millimeter square stainless-steel plate was designed to characterize scanner performance through a series of “pass” or “attention required” tests assessing laser and scanner delays, scanner acceleration, dimensional accuracy, and slicer file software interpretation. The method was then applied on four PBF-LB/M machines, with one plate scanned per laser under machine original equipment manufacturer (OEM) recommended build conditions. Laser power and scan speed parameters were specified to be the same for the four machines. The results show notable variations in scanner delays, scanner momentum control, and path planning file preparation that impact the results of the laser welding. A simple example of the machine-to-machine variability was captured when three out of the four machines tested were unable to produce dimensionally accurate 1 mm diameter circles. In addition, all machines required attention during numerous tests aimed at slicer file software interpretation, which highlights critical gaps in the physical and programmable scanner control of PBF-LB/M machines. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of the proposed plate melt method to assess scanner subsystem performance without the challenges of current standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7172,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 104694"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860425000582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Installation qualification for laser-based powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) machines is challenging due to the extensive labor, time, and financial costs required by current standards. These standards demand long builds, expensive equipment, and specialized expertise, primarily focusing on mechanical properties, which complicates the analysis of subsystem performance where attention may be required. Consequently, this makes machine installation qualification both inaccessible and inconsistent for typical PBF-LB/M users. This study presents a new methodology for installation qualification of PBF-LB/M scanner subsystem hardware and control software that addresses these challenges, empowering users to qualify their systems. A plate melt setup using a commercially available 25.4-millimeter square stainless-steel plate was designed to characterize scanner performance through a series of “pass” or “attention required” tests assessing laser and scanner delays, scanner acceleration, dimensional accuracy, and slicer file software interpretation. The method was then applied on four PBF-LB/M machines, with one plate scanned per laser under machine original equipment manufacturer (OEM) recommended build conditions. Laser power and scan speed parameters were specified to be the same for the four machines. The results show notable variations in scanner delays, scanner momentum control, and path planning file preparation that impact the results of the laser welding. A simple example of the machine-to-machine variability was captured when three out of the four machines tested were unable to produce dimensionally accurate 1 mm diameter circles. In addition, all machines required attention during numerous tests aimed at slicer file software interpretation, which highlights critical gaps in the physical and programmable scanner control of PBF-LB/M machines. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of the proposed plate melt method to assess scanner subsystem performance without the challenges of current standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于激光的粉末床金属熔合(PBF-LB/M)机器扫描仪子系统的用户启用安装鉴定方法
基于激光的粉末床熔融金属(PBF-LB/M)机器的安装资格是具有挑战性的,因为目前的标准需要大量的劳动力、时间和财务成本。这些标准需要长时间的建造、昂贵的设备和专门的技术,主要集中在机械性能上,这使得子系统性能的分析变得复杂,而这可能需要注意。因此,这使得典型的PBF-LB/M用户无法获得机器安装资格,并且不一致。本研究提出了一种新的PBF-LB/M扫描仪子系统硬件和控制软件的安装鉴定方法,解决了这些挑战,使用户能够对他们的系统进行鉴定。采用商用25.4毫米方形不锈钢板的板熔化装置,通过一系列“通过”或“需要注意”的测试来评估激光和扫描仪延迟、扫描仪加速、尺寸精度和切片机文件软件解释,从而表征扫描仪的性能。然后将该方法应用于四台PBF-LB/M机器上,在机器原始设备制造商(OEM)推荐的制造条件下,每个激光扫描一个板。指定四台机器的激光功率和扫描速度参数相同。结果表明,在激光焊接过程中,扫描仪延迟、扫描仪动量控制和路径规划文件的制备等方面存在显著差异。当测试的四台机器中有三台无法产生尺寸精确的1 mm直径圆时,捕获了机器对机器可变性的一个简单示例。此外,在针对切片机文件软件解释的众多测试中,所有机器都需要注意,这突出了PBF-LB/M机器在物理和可编程扫描仪控制方面的关键差距。总体而言,本研究证明了所提出的板熔体方法在没有当前标准挑战的情况下评估扫描仪子系统性能的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing
Additive manufacturing Materials Science-General Materials Science
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.70%
发文量
648
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Additive Manufacturing stands as a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to delivering high-quality research papers and reviews in the field of additive manufacturing, serving both academia and industry leaders. The journal's objective is to recognize the innovative essence of additive manufacturing and its diverse applications, providing a comprehensive overview of current developments and future prospects. The transformative potential of additive manufacturing technologies in product design and manufacturing is poised to disrupt traditional approaches. In response to this paradigm shift, a distinctive and comprehensive publication outlet was essential. Additive Manufacturing fulfills this need, offering a platform for engineers, materials scientists, and practitioners across academia and various industries to document and share innovations in these evolving technologies.
期刊最新文献
Eliminating pores and achieving isotropic properties in Al-Cu alloy by high-power oscillating laser-arc hybrid additive manufacturing Additive crosstalk suppression via critical criteria and optimal design for array electrohydrodynamic atomization printing A scientific deep learning framework integrating process stochasticity with high-fidelity simulation for millisecond-scale melt pool prediction for L-PBF process Powder-level carbide modification controls HIP grain growth and enhances fatigue in reused additively manufactured superalloy Coarsening- and creep behavior of supersaturated Al-Zr-X (X = Mn, Cr, V, Mo, W) alloys processed by laser powder-bed fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1