The effectiveness of a fish-friendly pumping station for critically endangered European eel; An assessment using live eels, fish-mounted sensors and passive sensors

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107526
Oliver Evans , Andrew Don , Jeffrey A. Tuhtan , Gert Toming , Christopher F. Williams , John C. Price , Rosalind M. Wright , Christopher Bell , Jonathan D. Bolland
{"title":"The effectiveness of a fish-friendly pumping station for critically endangered European eel; An assessment using live eels, fish-mounted sensors and passive sensors","authors":"Oliver Evans ,&nbsp;Andrew Don ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Tuhtan ,&nbsp;Gert Toming ,&nbsp;Christopher F. Williams ,&nbsp;John C. Price ,&nbsp;Rosalind M. Wright ,&nbsp;Christopher Bell ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Bolland","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fish-friendly pumps may provide safe downstream passage for seaward migrating silver European eel, <em>Anguilla anguilla</em>, at pumping stations but further research into their effectiveness is urgently required. This study uniquely combined health assessments of live fish, including behaviour, delayed (48-h) mortality and post-mortem post-passage, with fish-mounted (fish backpack sensors; FBS) and passive (barotrauma detection system; BDS) sensors that passed through a fish-friendly axial flow pump in situ at a real-world pumping station to comprehensively quantify the effectiveness. Nineteen eels (including two control eels released directly into the recapture net) were recaptured and there was no immediate or delayed (<em>n</em> = 5, including one control eel) mortality or behavioural change, nor were there any major external or internal injuries. Minor external injuries were newly present on most eels (84.6 %) that underwent a post-mortem post-passage (<em>n</em> = 13) but were equivalent to the types of pathologies recorded pre-passage and were considered unlikely to affect function or survival. A previously defined acceleration threshold for fish vertebrae damage (&gt;50 m/s<sup>2</sup>) was exceeded by all FBS and BDS (up to 66.48 m/s<sup>2</sup>), predominantly (89.15 %) after passing through the pump, but no eels showed any evidence of spinal injury or vertebral deformity, indicating that this threshold may be overly conservative for eels. Extremes of pressure (i.e., nadir) and changes in pressure (i.e., pressure rate of change (PRC) and log ratio of pressure change (LRPC)) recorded by FBS and BDS were well below thresholds known to induce injury in American eels (<em>Anguilla rostrata</em>) of similar length and no pressure-related injuries were found during post-mortems. Indeed, it illustrated the importance of using sensors alongside live fish to further our understanding of species-specific injury thresholds. Overall, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of a newly installed axial flow fish-friendly pump (under ‘normal’ operating conditions), using live fish and two types of sensors to quantify conditions during passage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 107526"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742500014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fish-friendly pumps may provide safe downstream passage for seaward migrating silver European eel, Anguilla anguilla, at pumping stations but further research into their effectiveness is urgently required. This study uniquely combined health assessments of live fish, including behaviour, delayed (48-h) mortality and post-mortem post-passage, with fish-mounted (fish backpack sensors; FBS) and passive (barotrauma detection system; BDS) sensors that passed through a fish-friendly axial flow pump in situ at a real-world pumping station to comprehensively quantify the effectiveness. Nineteen eels (including two control eels released directly into the recapture net) were recaptured and there was no immediate or delayed (n = 5, including one control eel) mortality or behavioural change, nor were there any major external or internal injuries. Minor external injuries were newly present on most eels (84.6 %) that underwent a post-mortem post-passage (n = 13) but were equivalent to the types of pathologies recorded pre-passage and were considered unlikely to affect function or survival. A previously defined acceleration threshold for fish vertebrae damage (>50 m/s2) was exceeded by all FBS and BDS (up to 66.48 m/s2), predominantly (89.15 %) after passing through the pump, but no eels showed any evidence of spinal injury or vertebral deformity, indicating that this threshold may be overly conservative for eels. Extremes of pressure (i.e., nadir) and changes in pressure (i.e., pressure rate of change (PRC) and log ratio of pressure change (LRPC)) recorded by FBS and BDS were well below thresholds known to induce injury in American eels (Anguilla rostrata) of similar length and no pressure-related injuries were found during post-mortems. Indeed, it illustrated the importance of using sensors alongside live fish to further our understanding of species-specific injury thresholds. Overall, this study demonstrated the effectiveness of a newly installed axial flow fish-friendly pump (under ‘normal’ operating conditions), using live fish and two types of sensors to quantify conditions during passage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
A review on constructed wetlands in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China: Application in water treatment, problem, and practical solution Assessment of oxygen demand loads and its application in effective decision-making for the rehabilitation of an urban lake Exploring key drivers of Chinese sturgeon spawning sites fragmentation in the Yangtze River: Insights into spawning window Deflecting danger: The role of screen angles in fish impingement The role of limpets in biodiversity patterns and bioerosion on coastal infrastructure: Insights from Plymouth Breakwater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1