Representation Model for Electromagnetic Maps Reconstruction via Sparse Nodes

IF 5.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1109/TIM.2025.3538059
Gongxu Liu;Xu-An Liu;Lu Huang;Long Li;Xinbo Gao
{"title":"Representation Model for Electromagnetic Maps Reconstruction via Sparse Nodes","authors":"Gongxu Liu;Xu-An Liu;Lu Huang;Long Li;Xinbo Gao","doi":"10.1109/TIM.2025.3538059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnetic (EM) maps hold promise for providing strategic support for future localization and navigation. However, reconstruction of EM maps under sparse nodes conditions is a critical challenge, which constrains the reliable and rapid construction of EM maps. To address this issue, we absorb the concept of Moran’s index and use location index, fingerprint index, and scaling index to quantify the topology, quality, and quantity of EM nodes, respectively. Besides, three node selection criteria were used: one based on random selection, another using the K-means clustering, and the third involving affinity propagation (AP) clustering. Under each criterion, the overall EM maps were reconstructed using four representative interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting (IDW), modified Shepard’s method (MSM), Kriging algorithm (KGA), and biharmonic spline interpolation (v4). Extensive experiments were conducted to verify the representation model. Experimental results indicate that the node selection criterion based on AP clustering outperforms the K-means criterion, which itself is superior to random selection criterion. This is attributed to the fact that under the same conditions, the AP clustering node selection criterion can better take the quality and the topological relationship of EM nodes into account. Another significant finding is that with good node selection criterion and reconstruction algorithms, only approximately 0.3%–0.5% of the nodes are required to achieve the reconstruction performance that would otherwise require up to 20% or more of the nodes. The above conclusions are of good guidance for the reliable and rapid reconstruction of EM maps via sparse or limited nodes.","PeriodicalId":13341,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"74 ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10880675/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electromagnetic (EM) maps hold promise for providing strategic support for future localization and navigation. However, reconstruction of EM maps under sparse nodes conditions is a critical challenge, which constrains the reliable and rapid construction of EM maps. To address this issue, we absorb the concept of Moran’s index and use location index, fingerprint index, and scaling index to quantify the topology, quality, and quantity of EM nodes, respectively. Besides, three node selection criteria were used: one based on random selection, another using the K-means clustering, and the third involving affinity propagation (AP) clustering. Under each criterion, the overall EM maps were reconstructed using four representative interpolation methods: inverse distance weighting (IDW), modified Shepard’s method (MSM), Kriging algorithm (KGA), and biharmonic spline interpolation (v4). Extensive experiments were conducted to verify the representation model. Experimental results indicate that the node selection criterion based on AP clustering outperforms the K-means criterion, which itself is superior to random selection criterion. This is attributed to the fact that under the same conditions, the AP clustering node selection criterion can better take the quality and the topological relationship of EM nodes into account. Another significant finding is that with good node selection criterion and reconstruction algorithms, only approximately 0.3%–0.5% of the nodes are required to achieve the reconstruction performance that would otherwise require up to 20% or more of the nodes. The above conclusions are of good guidance for the reliable and rapid reconstruction of EM maps via sparse or limited nodes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于稀疏节点的电磁地图重构表示模型
电磁地图有望为未来的定位和导航提供战略支持。然而,在稀疏节点条件下的EM地图重建是一个关键的挑战,它限制了EM地图的可靠和快速构建。为了解决这一问题,我们吸收Moran指数的概念,使用位置指数、指纹指数和缩放指数分别量化EM节点的拓扑结构、质量和数量。此外,使用了三种节点选择标准:一种基于随机选择,另一种使用K-means聚类,第三种涉及亲和传播(AP)聚类。在每个准则下,采用4种具有代表性的插值方法:逆距离加权法(IDW)、修正Shepard法(MSM)、Kriging算法(KGA)和双调和样条插值法(v4)重建整体电磁图谱。进行了大量的实验来验证表征模型。实验结果表明,基于AP聚类的节点选择准则优于K-means准则,K-means准则本身优于随机选择准则。这是因为在相同条件下,AP聚类节点选择准则能更好地考虑EM节点的质量和拓扑关系。另一个重要的发现是,使用良好的节点选择标准和重建算法,只需要大约0.3%-0.5%的节点就可以实现重建性能,否则需要多达20%或更多的节点。以上结论对于通过稀疏节点或有限节点可靠、快速地重建EM地图具有很好的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
23.20%
发文量
1294
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Papers are sought that address innovative solutions to the development and use of electrical and electronic instruments and equipment to measure, monitor and/or record physical phenomena for the purpose of advancing measurement science, methods, functionality and applications. The scope of these papers may encompass: (1) theory, methodology, and practice of measurement; (2) design, development and evaluation of instrumentation and measurement systems and components used in generating, acquiring, conditioning and processing signals; (3) analysis, representation, display, and preservation of the information obtained from a set of measurements; and (4) scientific and technical support to establishment and maintenance of technical standards in the field of Instrumentation and Measurement.
期刊最新文献
2026 Index IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement Vol. 74 A Novel End-to-End Framework for Low-SNR FID Signal Denoising via Rank-Sequential Truncated Tensor Decomposition Corrections to “TAG: A Temporal Attentive Gait Network for Cross-View Gait Recognition” An Adaptive Joint Alignment Method of Angle Misalignment and Seafloor Transponder for Ultrashort Baseline Underwater Positioning Focus Improvement of Multireceiver SAS Based on Range-Doppler Algorithm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1