Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Problem-Solving Ability: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/jcal.70002
Zhihui Cai, Xin Zhang, Caiyan Liu, Jieni Zhan
{"title":"Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Problem-Solving Ability: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis","authors":"Zhihui Cai,&nbsp;Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Caiyan Liu,&nbsp;Jieni Zhan","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Problem-solving ability is an important skill for students to develop in the 21st century. Many previous studies have focused on the impact of diverse digital educational games on problem-solving ability. However, there is inconsistency in the findings, with some studies reporting positive effects of digital game-based learning (DGBL) on problem-solving ability, while others either found no significant improvement or reported negative effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to conduct a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the influence of DGBL on problem-solving ability. Additionally, the study aimed to examine various moderating factors to explore the potential sources of inconsistency among the primary studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through a systematic literature search, 21 primary studies were identified, encompassing a total of 60 effect sizes. The analysis involved assessing the effectiveness of DGBL in enhancing students' problem-solving ability and examining heterogeneity among the studies. Moderator analysis was also conducted to explore the impact of different factors on the effectiveness of DGBL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results indicated that DGBL could effectively enhance students' problem-solving ability (<i>g</i> = 0.654), with significant heterogeneity observed among studies (<i>Q</i> = 858.358, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, our findings suggested that studies focusing on the perception of problem-solving ability (<i>g</i> = 1.498) yielded significantly larger effect size compared to studies focused on problem-solving skill (<i>g</i> = 0.440). Moreover, combining relevant teaching strategies with DGBL (<i>g</i> = 1.246) resulted in a significantly better effect compared to using DGBL alone (<i>g</i> = 0.399). The analysis of moderating factors revealed that the effect size was significantly influenced by teaching strategy and problem-solving construct. Other examined moderating factors did not show significant effects on the inconsistent findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Problem-solving ability is an important skill for students to develop in the 21st century. Many previous studies have focused on the impact of diverse digital educational games on problem-solving ability. However, there is inconsistency in the findings, with some studies reporting positive effects of digital game-based learning (DGBL) on problem-solving ability, while others either found no significant improvement or reported negative effects.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to conduct a three-level meta-analysis to investigate the influence of DGBL on problem-solving ability. Additionally, the study aimed to examine various moderating factors to explore the potential sources of inconsistency among the primary studies.

Methods

Through a systematic literature search, 21 primary studies were identified, encompassing a total of 60 effect sizes. The analysis involved assessing the effectiveness of DGBL in enhancing students' problem-solving ability and examining heterogeneity among the studies. Moderator analysis was also conducted to explore the impact of different factors on the effectiveness of DGBL.

Results and Conclusions

The results indicated that DGBL could effectively enhance students' problem-solving ability (g = 0.654), with significant heterogeneity observed among studies (Q = 858.358, p < 0.001). Furthermore, our findings suggested that studies focusing on the perception of problem-solving ability (g = 1.498) yielded significantly larger effect size compared to studies focused on problem-solving skill (g = 0.440). Moreover, combining relevant teaching strategies with DGBL (g = 1.246) resulted in a significantly better effect compared to using DGBL alone (g = 0.399). The analysis of moderating factors revealed that the effect size was significantly influenced by teaching strategy and problem-solving construct. Other examined moderating factors did not show significant effects on the inconsistent findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
期刊最新文献
Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Problem-Solving Ability: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis Fostering EFL Learners' Speaking Skills and Flow Experience With Video-Dubbing Tasks: A Flow Theory Perspective Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community Ecological Analysis of Technology Use Among Children in Collaborative Design Contexts ‘Less Knowledge, Better Experience’: Examining the Expertise Reversal Effect in Learning With Instructor-Generated Drawings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1