Large Language Models in Cosmetic Dermatology

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/jocd.70044
Marina Landau, George Kroumpouzos, Mohamad Goldust
{"title":"Large Language Models in Cosmetic Dermatology","authors":"Marina Landau,&nbsp;George Kroumpouzos,&nbsp;Mohamad Goldust","doi":"10.1111/jocd.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, is expanding healthcare, specifically in the field of cosmetic dermatology. These advanced AI systems are designed to process and generate human-like text by analyzing vast amounts of data. Through natural language processing (NLP), LLMs offer innovative solutions that improve patient care, facilitate clinical workflows, and accelerate research efforts. However, while these models hold significant potential, it is crucial to address their limitations, as well as the ethical considerations and regulatory challenges associated with their use, to ensure responsible implementation [<span>1, 2</span>].</p><p>At their core, LLMs are sophisticated computer programs capable of understanding and generating human-like text. Imagine conversing with a knowledgeable assistant who can quickly summarize medical research, suggest treatment options, or answer complex questions. LLMs achieve this by learning patterns from extensive datasets, including books, articles, and scientific journals. With this training, they can synthesize information and provide coherent responses to user inquiries [<span>3</span>].</p><p>LLMs are expanding several aspects of cosmetic dermatology. One key application lies in patient education. By simplifying complex medical terminology, LLMs make cosmetic procedures, such as dermal fillers, neurotoxins, and laser therapies, more accessible to patients. This improved communication enables patients to make informed decisions about their care. Additionally, these tools have the potential to bridge knowledge gaps in underserved communities, although challenges like limited digital proficiency and internet access still persist.</p><p>Another critical application is personalized treatment planning. LLMs can analyze patient histories, procedural risks, and desired outcomes to provide evidence-based recommendations. For instance, they may suggest combining microneedling with platelet-rich plasma therapy to achieve optimal skin rejuvenation. While this personalization can enhance treatment outcomes, it requires clinician oversight to ensure that recommendations match individual patient needs and are free from bias.</p><p>LLMs also contribute to administrative efficiency in dermatology practices. Integrating these tools into electronic medical record (EMR) systems can automate tasks such as clinical note-taking, scheduling, and insurance coding. This automation reduces administrative burdens, allowing clinicians to devote more time to direct patient care [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Follow-up care and monitoring are additional areas where LLMs show efficiency. These models can interact with patients' postprocedure, ensuring adherence to recovery protocols, identifying potential complications, and assessing satisfaction levels. These capabilities enhance continuity of care and provide valuable feedback for clinicians to improve their services.</p><p>In training and simulation, LLMs are advancing dermatology education. Virtual platforms powered by AI simulate patient scenarios and provide real-time feedback, enabling trainees to refine diagnostic and procedural skills in a safe and interactive environment. This application is particularly beneficial for mastering emerging techniques in cosmetic dermatology.</p><p>Emerging technologies, such as predictive modeling and augmented reality (AR), are also benefiting from the integration of LLMs. For example, tools like Gemini can combine text and image analysis to simulate procedural outcomes, such as the effects of laser resurfacing. This capability enhances communication between clinicians and patients, setting realistic expectations and improving satisfaction.</p><p>Despite their potential, large language models (LLMs) present several challenges. One major concern is the risk of inaccuracies and biases. Training datasets that lack diversity can lead to inequitable or unreliable recommendations. For example, some AI tools have been misrepresented as using LLM technology, such as Skinive and AestheticPro AI, which could mislead users about their actual capabilities.</p><p>Ethical concerns also arise regarding patient data privacy. Sharing sensitive medical information with AI systems necessitates robust encryption and compliance with regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR. Without strict protections, these systems could unintentionally compromise patient confidentiality.</p><p>Accessibility is another critical issue. Underserved populations, who could benefit significantly from AI advancements, often face barriers such as limited internet access, low digital proficiency, and high costs. Developing cost-effective and offline-compatible tools is essential to address these disparities and ensure equitable access.</p><p>High subscription costs associated with advanced AI platforms may prevent smaller practices or underfunded institutions from adopting these technologies. Addressing this financial barrier is crucial to preventing healthcare inequities.</p><p>Human oversight remains vital in the use of LLMs. These tools should complement, not replace, clinical expertise. Ensuring that AI outputs are validated by clinicians helps maintain accuracy and provides trust with patients.</p><p>To ensure the safe and effective use of LLMs, clinical validation is essential. Tools like DermaGPT and DeepSkinAI must undergo rigorous testing to evaluate their reliability in real-world settings. Additionally, customizing these technologies with established regulatory frameworks, such as FDA guidelines, can standardize approval processes and decrease potential risks.</p><p>Collaboration among AI developers, dermatologists, and policymakers is necessary to address these challenges. This partnership can help develop ethical guidelines, enhance data quality, and promote equitable access to these transformative tools [<span>5</span>].</p><p>The responsible use of LLMs requires a multi-directional approach. First, ensuring data quality by providing diverse and representative datasets can minimize biases. Second, conducting peer-reviewed studies to validate AI tools enhances their credibility. Third, investing in affordable solutions can help bridge accessibility gaps, particularly in underserved areas. Finally, educating both clinicians and patients about the capabilities and limitations of LLMs is crucial for providing informed usage and trust.</p><p>Large language models such as ChatGPT and Gemini are set to transform cosmetic dermatology by improving patient engagement, optimizing clinical workflows, and driving innovation in research. However, realizing their full potential requires addressing their limitations, including biases, ethical concerns, and accessibility challenges. Through collaboration and innovation, these technologies can deliver on their promise while upholding equity, trust, and clinical integrity.</p><p>We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":15546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jocd.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Gemini, is expanding healthcare, specifically in the field of cosmetic dermatology. These advanced AI systems are designed to process and generate human-like text by analyzing vast amounts of data. Through natural language processing (NLP), LLMs offer innovative solutions that improve patient care, facilitate clinical workflows, and accelerate research efforts. However, while these models hold significant potential, it is crucial to address their limitations, as well as the ethical considerations and regulatory challenges associated with their use, to ensure responsible implementation [1, 2].

At their core, LLMs are sophisticated computer programs capable of understanding and generating human-like text. Imagine conversing with a knowledgeable assistant who can quickly summarize medical research, suggest treatment options, or answer complex questions. LLMs achieve this by learning patterns from extensive datasets, including books, articles, and scientific journals. With this training, they can synthesize information and provide coherent responses to user inquiries [3].

LLMs are expanding several aspects of cosmetic dermatology. One key application lies in patient education. By simplifying complex medical terminology, LLMs make cosmetic procedures, such as dermal fillers, neurotoxins, and laser therapies, more accessible to patients. This improved communication enables patients to make informed decisions about their care. Additionally, these tools have the potential to bridge knowledge gaps in underserved communities, although challenges like limited digital proficiency and internet access still persist.

Another critical application is personalized treatment planning. LLMs can analyze patient histories, procedural risks, and desired outcomes to provide evidence-based recommendations. For instance, they may suggest combining microneedling with platelet-rich plasma therapy to achieve optimal skin rejuvenation. While this personalization can enhance treatment outcomes, it requires clinician oversight to ensure that recommendations match individual patient needs and are free from bias.

LLMs also contribute to administrative efficiency in dermatology practices. Integrating these tools into electronic medical record (EMR) systems can automate tasks such as clinical note-taking, scheduling, and insurance coding. This automation reduces administrative burdens, allowing clinicians to devote more time to direct patient care [4].

Follow-up care and monitoring are additional areas where LLMs show efficiency. These models can interact with patients' postprocedure, ensuring adherence to recovery protocols, identifying potential complications, and assessing satisfaction levels. These capabilities enhance continuity of care and provide valuable feedback for clinicians to improve their services.

In training and simulation, LLMs are advancing dermatology education. Virtual platforms powered by AI simulate patient scenarios and provide real-time feedback, enabling trainees to refine diagnostic and procedural skills in a safe and interactive environment. This application is particularly beneficial for mastering emerging techniques in cosmetic dermatology.

Emerging technologies, such as predictive modeling and augmented reality (AR), are also benefiting from the integration of LLMs. For example, tools like Gemini can combine text and image analysis to simulate procedural outcomes, such as the effects of laser resurfacing. This capability enhances communication between clinicians and patients, setting realistic expectations and improving satisfaction.

Despite their potential, large language models (LLMs) present several challenges. One major concern is the risk of inaccuracies and biases. Training datasets that lack diversity can lead to inequitable or unreliable recommendations. For example, some AI tools have been misrepresented as using LLM technology, such as Skinive and AestheticPro AI, which could mislead users about their actual capabilities.

Ethical concerns also arise regarding patient data privacy. Sharing sensitive medical information with AI systems necessitates robust encryption and compliance with regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR. Without strict protections, these systems could unintentionally compromise patient confidentiality.

Accessibility is another critical issue. Underserved populations, who could benefit significantly from AI advancements, often face barriers such as limited internet access, low digital proficiency, and high costs. Developing cost-effective and offline-compatible tools is essential to address these disparities and ensure equitable access.

High subscription costs associated with advanced AI platforms may prevent smaller practices or underfunded institutions from adopting these technologies. Addressing this financial barrier is crucial to preventing healthcare inequities.

Human oversight remains vital in the use of LLMs. These tools should complement, not replace, clinical expertise. Ensuring that AI outputs are validated by clinicians helps maintain accuracy and provides trust with patients.

To ensure the safe and effective use of LLMs, clinical validation is essential. Tools like DermaGPT and DeepSkinAI must undergo rigorous testing to evaluate their reliability in real-world settings. Additionally, customizing these technologies with established regulatory frameworks, such as FDA guidelines, can standardize approval processes and decrease potential risks.

Collaboration among AI developers, dermatologists, and policymakers is necessary to address these challenges. This partnership can help develop ethical guidelines, enhance data quality, and promote equitable access to these transformative tools [5].

The responsible use of LLMs requires a multi-directional approach. First, ensuring data quality by providing diverse and representative datasets can minimize biases. Second, conducting peer-reviewed studies to validate AI tools enhances their credibility. Third, investing in affordable solutions can help bridge accessibility gaps, particularly in underserved areas. Finally, educating both clinicians and patients about the capabilities and limitations of LLMs is crucial for providing informed usage and trust.

Large language models such as ChatGPT and Gemini are set to transform cosmetic dermatology by improving patient engagement, optimizing clinical workflows, and driving innovation in research. However, realizing their full potential requires addressing their limitations, including biases, ethical concerns, and accessibility challenges. Through collaboration and innovation, these technologies can deliver on their promise while upholding equity, trust, and clinical integrity.

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化妆品皮肤病学中的大型语言模型
人工智能(AI),特别是像ChatGPT和Gemini这样的大型语言模型(llm),正在扩大医疗保健领域,特别是在美容皮肤科领域。这些先进的人工智能系统旨在通过分析大量数据来处理和生成类似人类的文本。通过自然语言处理(NLP), llm提供创新的解决方案,改善患者护理,促进临床工作流程,并加快研究工作。然而,尽管这些模型具有巨大的潜力,但解决它们的局限性以及与它们的使用相关的道德考虑和监管挑战是至关重要的,以确保负责任的实施[1,2]。法学硕士的核心是复杂的计算机程序,能够理解和生成类似人类的文本。想象一下,与一个知识渊博的助手交谈,他可以快速总结医学研究,提出治疗方案,或回答复杂的问题。法学硕士通过从广泛的数据集(包括书籍、文章和科学期刊)中学习模式来实现这一目标。通过这种培训,他们可以综合信息并对用户查询提供一致的响应b[3]。法学硕士正在扩展皮肤美容学的几个方面。一个关键的应用是病人教育。通过简化复杂的医学术语,llm使美容手术,如真皮填充物,神经毒素和激光治疗,更容易为患者所接受。这种改进的沟通使患者能够对他们的护理做出明智的决定。此外,这些工具有可能弥合服务不足社区的知识差距,尽管数字熟练程度和互联网接入有限等挑战仍然存在。另一个关键的应用是个性化的治疗计划。法学硕士可以分析病人的病史、程序风险和期望的结果,以提供基于证据的建议。例如,他们可能建议将微针与富血小板血浆疗法结合起来,以达到最佳的皮肤再生效果。虽然这种个性化可以提高治疗效果,但它需要临床医生的监督,以确保建议符合个别患者的需求,并且没有偏见。法学硕士也有助于皮肤病学实践的管理效率。将这些工具集成到电子医疗记录(EMR)系统中可以自动完成临床记录、日程安排和保险编码等任务。这种自动化减少了管理负担,使临床医生能够投入更多时间来指导患者护理。后续护理和监测是llm显示效率的其他领域。这些模型可以与患者术后互动,确保对康复方案的遵守,识别潜在的并发症,并评估满意度。这些功能增强了护理的连续性,并为临床医生提供有价值的反馈,以改善他们的服务。在培训和模拟中,法学硕士正在推进皮肤学教育。由人工智能驱动的虚拟平台模拟患者场景并提供实时反馈,使受训者能够在安全和互动的环境中完善诊断和程序技能。这个应用程序是特别有利于掌握新兴技术在美容皮肤科。新兴技术,如预测建模和增强现实(AR),也受益于法学硕士的整合。例如,像Gemini这样的工具可以结合文本和图像分析来模拟程序结果,比如激光换肤的效果。这种能力增强了临床医生和患者之间的沟通,设定了切合实际的期望,提高了满意度。尽管具有潜力,大型语言模型(llm)仍然面临着一些挑战。一个主要的担忧是不准确和偏见的风险。缺乏多样性的训练数据集可能导致不公平或不可靠的建议。例如,一些人工智能工具被错误地描述为使用法学硕士技术,如Skinive和AestheticPro AI,这可能会误导用户了解它们的实际功能。患者数据隐私方面也出现了伦理问题。与人工智能系统共享敏感医疗信息需要强大的加密,并遵守HIPAA和GDPR等法规。如果没有严格的保护,这些系统可能会无意中损害患者的隐私。可访问性是另一个关键问题。服务不足的人群可以从人工智能的进步中获益良多,但他们往往面临着互联网接入有限、数字熟练程度低和成本高等障碍。开发具有成本效益和离线兼容的工具对于解决这些差异和确保公平获取至关重要。与先进人工智能平台相关的高订阅成本可能会阻止规模较小的实践或资金不足的机构采用这些技术。解决这一财务障碍对于防止医疗保健不公平至关重要。 人类的监督在法学硕士的使用中仍然至关重要。这些工具应该补充而不是取代临床专业知识。确保人工智能输出得到临床医生的验证,有助于保持准确性,并为患者提供信任。为了确保llm的安全有效使用,临床验证是必不可少的。像DermaGPT和DeepSkinAI这样的工具必须经过严格的测试,以评估它们在现实环境中的可靠性。此外,根据已建立的监管框架(如FDA指南)定制这些技术,可以标准化审批流程并降低潜在风险。要应对这些挑战,人工智能开发者、皮肤科医生和政策制定者之间的合作是必要的。这种伙伴关系有助于制定道德准则,提高数据质量,促进公平获取这些变革性工具。负责任地使用法学硕士需要一个多方位的方法。首先,通过提供多样化和代表性的数据集来确保数据质量可以最大限度地减少偏差。其次,进行同行评议的研究来验证人工智能工具,可以提高它们的可信度。第三,投资于负担得起的解决方案可以帮助弥合可及性差距,特别是在服务不足的地区。最后,教育临床医生和患者llm的能力和局限性对于提供知情使用和信任至关重要。ChatGPT和Gemini等大型语言模型将通过提高患者参与度、优化临床工作流程和推动研究创新来改变美容皮肤科。然而,要实现它们的全部潜力,需要解决它们的局限性,包括偏见、伦理问题和可访问性挑战。通过合作和创新,这些技术可以实现其承诺,同时维护公平、信任和临床诚信。我们确认稿件已被所有作者阅读并批准,符合本文档前面所述的作者资格要求,并且每位作者都相信稿件代表了诚实的工作。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
818
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology publishes high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cosmetic dermatology with the aim to foster the highest standards of patient care in cosmetic dermatology. Published quarterly, the Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology facilitates continuing professional development and provides a forum for the exchange of scientific research and innovative techniques. The scope of coverage includes, but will not be limited to: healthy skin; skin maintenance; ageing skin; photodamage and photoprotection; rejuvenation; biochemistry, endocrinology and neuroimmunology of healthy skin; imaging; skin measurement; quality of life; skin types; sensitive skin; rosacea and acne; sebum; sweat; fat; phlebology; hair conservation, restoration and removal; nails and nail surgery; pigment; psychological and medicolegal issues; retinoids; cosmetic chemistry; dermopharmacy; cosmeceuticals; toiletries; striae; cellulite; cosmetic dermatological surgery; blepharoplasty; liposuction; surgical complications; botulinum; fillers, peels and dermabrasion; local and tumescent anaesthesia; electrosurgery; lasers, including laser physics, laser research and safety, vascular lasers, pigment lasers, hair removal lasers, tattoo removal lasers, resurfacing lasers, dermal remodelling lasers and laser complications.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Propranolol Versus Other Drugs in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma Xanthelasma-Like Reaction Following Poly-L-Lactic Acid Intradermal Injection Managed With Fractional Non-Ablative Lasers and Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media: A Case Report Integrated CO2 Laser Treatment and Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Postadolescent Acne Excoriée: Clinical Outcomes From a Case Series A Novel 1726 Nm Laser Therapy for Durable Clearance of Seborrheic Dermatitis VYC-17.5L is Safe and Effective in Improving Skin Quality and Volume Deficit of Hands: Results From an 18-Month Open-Label Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1