A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Statutory Duty of Candour in Victorian Health Services: Study Protocol

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Expectations Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/hex.70180
Reema Harrison, Corey Adams, Nabila Binte Haque, Jennifer Morris, Liat Watson, Kristiina Siiankoski, Ashfaq Chauhan, Thrivedi Sesha Sai Danthakani, Sarah Ameen, Peter Hibbert, Elizabeth Manias, Nicole Youngs, Lanii Birks, Ramesh Walpola, Sarah Fischer, Jeffrey Braithwaite
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Statutory Duty of Candour in Victorian Health Services: Study Protocol","authors":"Reema Harrison,&nbsp;Corey Adams,&nbsp;Nabila Binte Haque,&nbsp;Jennifer Morris,&nbsp;Liat Watson,&nbsp;Kristiina Siiankoski,&nbsp;Ashfaq Chauhan,&nbsp;Thrivedi Sesha Sai Danthakani,&nbsp;Sarah Ameen,&nbsp;Peter Hibbert,&nbsp;Elizabeth Manias,&nbsp;Nicole Youngs,&nbsp;Lanii Birks,&nbsp;Ramesh Walpola,&nbsp;Sarah Fischer,&nbsp;Jeffrey Braithwaite","doi":"10.1111/hex.70180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A statutory duty of candour (SDC) was introduced in 2022 in the Australian state of Victoria to increase openness and honesty with patients and families about healthcare adverse events. SDC requires each healthcare service entity by law to provide the patient or their family or carer who experiences an adverse event with; a written account of the facts, an apology, a description of the health service's response to the event, and the steps being taken to prevent reoccurrence. This research aims to evaluate the impacts of SDC in the 2 years since its implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods sequential design will be employed, comprising a document literature review, document analysis, survey and interview data from patients, families and health service staff between 2024 and 2026.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>By conducting an evaluation of the impacts of SDC within 2 years of its implementation in Victorian health settings, this research will provide the first independent evidence of how the SDC is being used and affecting healthcare experiences. This research will use evaluation criteria from the UK's Duty of Candour review to gather data that can be compared with UK findings and the disclosure experiences of patients in New South Wales, Australia. Our findings will provide a vital contribution to the sparse evidence base about the SDC and its application in healthcare settings internationally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Three members of the public (JM, LW and KS) were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocol, the protocol paper as authors and the protocol for the systematic review that has been developed as a basis for this research. These collaborators will contribute to be involved in all aspects of the research as part of the project team.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70180","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A statutory duty of candour (SDC) was introduced in 2022 in the Australian state of Victoria to increase openness and honesty with patients and families about healthcare adverse events. SDC requires each healthcare service entity by law to provide the patient or their family or carer who experiences an adverse event with; a written account of the facts, an apology, a description of the health service's response to the event, and the steps being taken to prevent reoccurrence. This research aims to evaluate the impacts of SDC in the 2 years since its implementation.

Design

A mixed-methods sequential design will be employed, comprising a document literature review, document analysis, survey and interview data from patients, families and health service staff between 2024 and 2026.

Discussion

By conducting an evaluation of the impacts of SDC within 2 years of its implementation in Victorian health settings, this research will provide the first independent evidence of how the SDC is being used and affecting healthcare experiences. This research will use evaluation criteria from the UK's Duty of Candour review to gather data that can be compared with UK findings and the disclosure experiences of patients in New South Wales, Australia. Our findings will provide a vital contribution to the sparse evidence base about the SDC and its application in healthcare settings internationally.

Patient or Public Contribution

Three members of the public (JM, LW and KS) were involved in the design of the research proposal, reviewing and contributing to the ethics protocol, the protocol paper as authors and the protocol for the systematic review that has been developed as a basis for this research. These collaborators will contribute to be involved in all aspects of the research as part of the project team.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维多利亚州卫生服务中法定诚实义务的混合方法评价:研究方案
澳大利亚维多利亚州于2022年引入了一项法定的坦诚义务(SDC),以增加对患者和家属关于医疗保健不良事件的公开和诚实。SDC要求每个医疗保健服务实体依法向经历不良事件的患者或其家属或护理人员提供:书面说明事实、道歉、说明卫生服务部门对该事件的反应以及为防止再次发生所采取的步骤。本研究旨在评估SDC实施2年来的影响。设计采用混合方法序列设计,包括文献综述、文献分析、调查和访谈数据,这些数据来自2024年至2026年间的患者、家属和卫生服务人员。通过对SDC在维多利亚州卫生机构实施两年内的影响进行评估,本研究将提供关于SDC如何被使用和影响医疗保健体验的第一个独立证据。本研究将使用英国“坦率责任”审查的评估标准来收集数据,这些数据可以与英国的研究结果和澳大利亚新南威尔士州患者的披露经验进行比较。我们的研究结果将为关于SDC及其在国际医疗保健环境中的应用的稀疏证据基础提供重要贡献。三名公众成员(JM, LW和KS)参与了研究计划的设计,作为作者审查并贡献了伦理协议、协议文件和系统评价协议,该协议已被制定为本研究的基础。这些合作者将作为项目团队的一员参与研究的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
期刊最新文献
'What Do People With Long Covid Want From Healthcare Services?' A Qualitative Exploration From Lived Experience. Lived Experiences of Returning to Participation After Mild Stroke: A Phenomenological Study in Spain. Integrating Community Health Workers Into Clinical Settings Combining Listening Cafés and a Games-Based Co-Design Approach for Public Involvement With Underserved Communities: A Methodology and Lessons Learned From Health Research The Work Undertaken by Patients and Their Families Whilst in the Emergency Department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1