Rania Elkhateb, Davis L Campbell, Xinyi Zhao, Graciela Mentz, Nadir El Sharawi, Sathish Kumar, Jill M Mhyre, Sachin Kheterpal, Douglas A Colquhoun
{"title":"Neuromuscular Blockade and Antagonism in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Multicenter Retrospective Cross Sectional Study.","authors":"Rania Elkhateb, Davis L Campbell, Xinyi Zhao, Graciela Mentz, Nadir El Sharawi, Sathish Kumar, Jill M Mhyre, Sachin Kheterpal, Douglas A Colquhoun","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current practice guidelines do not address the use of neuromuscular blocking and antagonism agents in patients with renal impairment. The FDA label for sugammadex advises against use in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 ml/min). Using a multicenter electronic health record registry, we sought to understand the modern use of neuromuscular blockade and antagonism agents in patients with significant renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was obtained from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) registry, for adult patients (>18yrs) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60ml/min, based on most recent serum creatinine, receiving general anesthesia for a non-renal transplant procedure with an endotracheal tube between January 1st 2016 and July 31st 2022. Patients were classified into three mutually exclusive blockade and reversal strategies: rocuronium-sugammadex, cisatracurium-neostigmine and rocuronium-neostigmine. Adjusted incidence of each blockade reversal strategy was established by a multinomial mixed effects model. The contribution of institution, anesthesiologist, and patient/case factors to variation to strategy choice was assessed by multilevel mixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 243,944 cases across 5,133 anesthesiologists and 48 institutions, adjusted use of rocuronium-sugammadex increased from 4.4% to 95.2% and rocuronium-neostigmine decreased from 84.7% to 4.3% and cisatracurium-neostigmine decreased from 10.9% to 0.5%. In patients with an eGFR <15ml/min, rocuronium-sugammadex use increased from 0.5% to 86.9%. 30.1% of the variation in choice of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine, was attributed to the institution, 22.7% to the attending anesthesiologist and 47.2% to patient/case factors or was unexplained. The adjusted median odds ratio for this choice was 2.5 for clinicians and 3.1 for institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rocuronium-sugammadex is the primary neuromuscular blockade-antagonism strategy for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. Variation in choice is significantly impacted by the institution and attending anesthesiologist providing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current practice guidelines do not address the use of neuromuscular blocking and antagonism agents in patients with renal impairment. The FDA label for sugammadex advises against use in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 ml/min). Using a multicenter electronic health record registry, we sought to understand the modern use of neuromuscular blockade and antagonism agents in patients with significant renal impairment (eGFR < 60 ml/min).
Methods: Data was obtained from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) registry, for adult patients (>18yrs) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60ml/min, based on most recent serum creatinine, receiving general anesthesia for a non-renal transplant procedure with an endotracheal tube between January 1st 2016 and July 31st 2022. Patients were classified into three mutually exclusive blockade and reversal strategies: rocuronium-sugammadex, cisatracurium-neostigmine and rocuronium-neostigmine. Adjusted incidence of each blockade reversal strategy was established by a multinomial mixed effects model. The contribution of institution, anesthesiologist, and patient/case factors to variation to strategy choice was assessed by multilevel mixed effects models.
Results: In 243,944 cases across 5,133 anesthesiologists and 48 institutions, adjusted use of rocuronium-sugammadex increased from 4.4% to 95.2% and rocuronium-neostigmine decreased from 84.7% to 4.3% and cisatracurium-neostigmine decreased from 10.9% to 0.5%. In patients with an eGFR <15ml/min, rocuronium-sugammadex use increased from 0.5% to 86.9%. 30.1% of the variation in choice of rocuronium-sugammadex vs cisatracurium-neostigmine, was attributed to the institution, 22.7% to the attending anesthesiologist and 47.2% to patient/case factors or was unexplained. The adjusted median odds ratio for this choice was 2.5 for clinicians and 3.1 for institutions.
Conclusion: Rocuronium-sugammadex is the primary neuromuscular blockade-antagonism strategy for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. Variation in choice is significantly impacted by the institution and attending anesthesiologist providing care.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.