Neuromuscular Blockade and Antagonism in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Multicenter Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005411
Rania Elkhateb, Davis L Campbell, Xinyi Zhao, Graciela Mentz, Nadir El Sharawi, Sathish Kumar, Jill M Mhyre, Sachin Kheterpal, Douglas A Colquhoun
{"title":"Neuromuscular Blockade and Antagonism in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Multicenter Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Rania Elkhateb, Davis L Campbell, Xinyi Zhao, Graciela Mentz, Nadir El Sharawi, Sathish Kumar, Jill M Mhyre, Sachin Kheterpal, Douglas A Colquhoun","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current practice guidelines do not address the use of neuromuscular blocking and antagonism agents in patients with renal impairment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Silver Spring, Maryland) label for sugammadex advises against use in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 30 ml/min). Using a multicenter electronic health record registry, the authors sought to understand the modern use of neuromuscular blockade and antagonism agents in patients with significant renal impairment (eGFR less than 60 ml/min).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) registry for adult patients (older than 18 yr) with an eGFR less than 60 ml/min, based on most recent serum creatinine, receiving general anesthesia for a nonrenal transplant procedure with an endotracheal tube between January 1, 2016, and July 31, 2022. Patients were classified into three mutually exclusive blockade and reversal strategies: rocuronium-sugammadex, cisatracurium-neostigmine, and rocuronium-neostigmine. Adjusted incidence of each blockade reversal strategy was established by a multinomial mixed effects model. The contribution of institution, anesthesiologist, and patient or case factors to variation in strategy choice was assessed by multilevel mixed effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 243,944 cases across 5,133 anesthesiologists and 48 institutions, adjusted use of rocuronium-sugammadex increased from 4.4 to 95.2%, rocuronium-neostigmine decreased from 84.7 to 4.3%, and cisatracurium-neostigmine decreased from 10.9 to 0.5%. In patients with an eGFR less than 15 ml/min, rocuronium-sugammadex use increased from 0.5 to 86.9%. Of the variation in choice of rocuronium-sugammadex versus cisatracurium-neostigmine, 30.1% was attributed to the institution, 22.7% to the attending anesthesiologist, and 47.2% to patient/case factors or was unexplained. The adjusted median odds ratio for this choice was 2.5 for clinicians and 3.1 for institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rocuronium-sugammadex is the primary neuromuscular blockade-antagonism strategy for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. Variation in choice is significantly impacted by the institution and attending anesthesiologist providing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"1009-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current practice guidelines do not address the use of neuromuscular blocking and antagonism agents in patients with renal impairment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Silver Spring, Maryland) label for sugammadex advises against use in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] less than 30 ml/min). Using a multicenter electronic health record registry, the authors sought to understand the modern use of neuromuscular blockade and antagonism agents in patients with significant renal impairment (eGFR less than 60 ml/min).

Methods: Data were obtained from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) registry for adult patients (older than 18 yr) with an eGFR less than 60 ml/min, based on most recent serum creatinine, receiving general anesthesia for a nonrenal transplant procedure with an endotracheal tube between January 1, 2016, and July 31, 2022. Patients were classified into three mutually exclusive blockade and reversal strategies: rocuronium-sugammadex, cisatracurium-neostigmine, and rocuronium-neostigmine. Adjusted incidence of each blockade reversal strategy was established by a multinomial mixed effects model. The contribution of institution, anesthesiologist, and patient or case factors to variation in strategy choice was assessed by multilevel mixed effects models.

Results: In 243,944 cases across 5,133 anesthesiologists and 48 institutions, adjusted use of rocuronium-sugammadex increased from 4.4 to 95.2%, rocuronium-neostigmine decreased from 84.7 to 4.3%, and cisatracurium-neostigmine decreased from 10.9 to 0.5%. In patients with an eGFR less than 15 ml/min, rocuronium-sugammadex use increased from 0.5 to 86.9%. Of the variation in choice of rocuronium-sugammadex versus cisatracurium-neostigmine, 30.1% was attributed to the institution, 22.7% to the attending anesthesiologist, and 47.2% to patient/case factors or was unexplained. The adjusted median odds ratio for this choice was 2.5 for clinicians and 3.1 for institutions.

Conclusion: Rocuronium-sugammadex is the primary neuromuscular blockade-antagonism strategy for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. Variation in choice is significantly impacted by the institution and attending anesthesiologist providing care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾损害患者的神经肌肉阻断和拮抗剂:一项多中心回顾性横断面研究。
背景:目前的实践指南没有涉及在肾功能损害患者中使用神经肌肉阻断和拮抗剂。FDA对sugammadex的标签建议严重肾功能损害(eGFR < 30 ml/min)的患者不要使用。通过多中心电子健康记录登记,我们试图了解神经肌肉阻滞剂和拮抗剂在严重肾功能损害(eGFR < 60 ml/min)患者中的现代应用。方法:数据来自多中心围手术期结局组(MPOG)注册表,数据来自2016年1月1日至2022年7月31日期间,根据最近的血清肌酐,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR) < 60ml/min的成人患者(bb0 - 18岁),接受气管内插管非肾移植手术的全身麻醉。患者被分为三种相互排斥的阻断和逆转策略:罗库溴铵-糖马德、顺阿曲库铵-新斯的明和罗库溴铵-新斯的明。采用多项混合效应模型建立各阻断逆转策略的调整发生率。通过多层混合效应模型评估机构、麻醉师和患者/病例因素对策略选择变异的贡献。结果:48家机构5133名麻醉医师的243944例患者中,罗库溴铵-糖胺酮调整使用率从4.4%上升至95.2%,罗库溴铵-新斯的明调整使用率从84.7%下降至4.3%,顺阿曲库铵-新斯的明调整使用率从10.9%下降至0.5%。结论:罗库罗宁-糖马德是中重度肾功能损害患者的主要神经肌肉阻断拮抗剂。选择的差异受到提供护理的机构和主治麻醉师的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Individualized Flow-controlled versus Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Liposomal Bupivacaine, Plain Bupivacaine, and Saline for Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks: The CLEVELAND Randomized Trial. Hemoptysis and Hypoxia after Supraglottic Airway Removal. Predicting Preoperative Consultation Clinician Time Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Audit Log Data. Maintaining Lower Fresh Gas Flows When Using Sevoflurane: An Observational Exploration of Data from a Single Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1