Epidemiology of Cataract-Related Blindness in Brazil: 30 Years of Public Policy Evolution: A Review Article

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY American Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.023
Newton Kara-Junior, Silvana Rossi
{"title":"Epidemiology of Cataract-Related Blindness in Brazil: 30 Years of Public Policy Evolution: A Review Article","authors":"Newton Kara-Junior,&nbsp;Silvana Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This review evaluated the impact of various public policies on the number of cataract surgeries performed annually by the Public Health System (SUS) in Brazil and its regions. The goal was to provide insights for managers and the medical community to assess the effectiveness of strategies to prevent cataract-related blindness.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Trend studies based on literature review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was developed through a literature review, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Until the early 2000s, approximately 130 000 cataract surgeries were performed annually in Brazil. In 2001, the National Cataract Campaign (CNC) was introduced, which significantly increased surgical volume by providing unrestricted federal funding. By 2003, the SUS had performed 430 000 surgeries, underscoring the critical role of funding in combating cataract blindness. However, the Ministry of Health discontinued the CNC in 2006, leading to a decline in surgeries in subsequent years. The annual surgical volume recovered to 430 000 only in 2011, following the adoption of new policies that involved directly contracting private companies through government tenders. In 2013, the SUS achieved the minimum number of surgeries required to prevent an accumulation of cataract blindness cases, conducting 530 000 procedures. By the early 2020s, parliamentary amendments directed to specific municipalities through Health Social Organizations became a primary funding source for cataract procedures. This approach proved effective, with approximately 860 000 surgeries performed in 2022 to prevent new accumulations and reduce overall cataract blindness. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted progress, causing a 23% decline in surgeries in 2020. However, surgical rates surged with the relaxation of restrictions in 2021, exceeding prepandemic levels by 21%. By 2022, the number of cataract surgeries increased by 63% compared with the prepandemic average, fully addressing the backlog created during the health crisis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The increase in surgeries was driven by unlimited federal funding, private contracts, and targeted parliamentary amendments. Despite these efforts, regional disparities persist, requiring equitable policies based on local epidemiologic data. Ensuring access to cataract surgery demands sustained public investment. The resilience of Brazil's SUS in the postpandemic era underscores the need for consistent investments to effectively address health care challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"273 ","pages":"Pages 205-211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000480","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This review evaluated the impact of various public policies on the number of cataract surgeries performed annually by the Public Health System (SUS) in Brazil and its regions. The goal was to provide insights for managers and the medical community to assess the effectiveness of strategies to prevent cataract-related blindness.

Design

Trend studies based on literature review.

Methods

This study was developed through a literature review, with a bibliographic survey conducted in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO.

Results

Until the early 2000s, approximately 130 000 cataract surgeries were performed annually in Brazil. In 2001, the National Cataract Campaign (CNC) was introduced, which significantly increased surgical volume by providing unrestricted federal funding. By 2003, the SUS had performed 430 000 surgeries, underscoring the critical role of funding in combating cataract blindness. However, the Ministry of Health discontinued the CNC in 2006, leading to a decline in surgeries in subsequent years. The annual surgical volume recovered to 430 000 only in 2011, following the adoption of new policies that involved directly contracting private companies through government tenders. In 2013, the SUS achieved the minimum number of surgeries required to prevent an accumulation of cataract blindness cases, conducting 530 000 procedures. By the early 2020s, parliamentary amendments directed to specific municipalities through Health Social Organizations became a primary funding source for cataract procedures. This approach proved effective, with approximately 860 000 surgeries performed in 2022 to prevent new accumulations and reduce overall cataract blindness. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted progress, causing a 23% decline in surgeries in 2020. However, surgical rates surged with the relaxation of restrictions in 2021, exceeding prepandemic levels by 21%. By 2022, the number of cataract surgeries increased by 63% compared with the prepandemic average, fully addressing the backlog created during the health crisis.

Conclusions

The increase in surgeries was driven by unlimited federal funding, private contracts, and targeted parliamentary amendments. Despite these efforts, regional disparities persist, requiring equitable policies based on local epidemiologic data. Ensuring access to cataract surgery demands sustained public investment. The resilience of Brazil's SUS in the postpandemic era underscores the need for consistent investments to effectively address health care challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西白内障相关失明的流行病学:30年的公共政策演变:综述文章。
目的:本综述评估了各种公共政策对巴西及其地区公共卫生系统(SUS)每年白内障手术数量的影响。目的是为管理人员和医学界提供见解,以评估预防白内障相关失明的战略的有效性。设计:基于文献回顾的趋势研究。方法:采用文献综述的方法,在PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、LILACS、SciELO等数据库中进行书目调查。结果:直到21世纪初,巴西每年大约进行13万例白内障手术。2001年,引入了国家白内障运动(CNC),通过提供无限制的联邦资金,大大增加了手术数量。到2003年,单一系统已经进行了43万例手术,强调了资金在防治白内障失明方面的关键作用。然而,卫生部于2006年终止了CNC,导致随后几年手术数量下降。直到2011年,通过政府招标直接与私营公司签订合同的新政策出台后,每年的手术数量才恢复到43万例。2013年,统一医疗系统实施了53万例手术,达到了防止白内障致盲病例积累所需的最低手术数量。到21世纪20年代初,通过卫生社会组织针对特定城市的议会修正案成为白内障手术的主要资金来源。这种方法被证明是有效的,在2022年进行了大约86万例手术,以防止新的积累并减少总体白内障失明。2019冠状病毒病大流行中断了进展,导致2020年手术数量下降23%。然而,随着2021年限制的放松,手术率飙升,比大流行前的水平高出21%。到2022年,与大流行前的平均水平相比,白内障手术数量增加了63%,充分解决了卫生危机期间造成的积压问题。结论:手术的增加是由无限的联邦资金、私人合同和有针对性的议会修正案推动的。尽管做出了这些努力,但区域差异仍然存在,需要根据当地流行病学数据制定公平的政策。确保获得白内障手术需要持续的公共投资。巴西单一卫生系统在大流行后时代的复原力凸显了持续投资以有效应对卫生保健挑战的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based diagnostic model for ocular surface neoplastic diseases Comparing the Vitreous Floaters Functional Questionnaire to the VFQ-25 in Vision Degrading Myodesopsia from Vitreous Floaters Assessing the Fragility of Statistically Significant Outcomes in Randomised Controlled Trials of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) Defining Discordance between Signs and Symptoms in Dry Eye Disease: Insights from the DRy Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study Association between Retinal Vein Occlusion and Epiretinal Membrane Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1