Advanced diffusion-weighted imaging biomarkers for non-invasive assessment of tumor microenvironment in rectal cancer: restricted spectrum imaging.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04819-w
Jie Yuan, Yiqun Sun, Kun Liu, Gang Han, Ziyuan Wang, Mengxiao Liu, Yongming Dai, Cui Tang, Dongmei Wu
{"title":"Advanced diffusion-weighted imaging biomarkers for non-invasive assessment of tumor microenvironment in rectal cancer: restricted spectrum imaging.","authors":"Jie Yuan, Yiqun Sun, Kun Liu, Gang Han, Ziyuan Wang, Mengxiao Liu, Yongming Dai, Cui Tang, Dongmei Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04819-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the heterogeneity of the rectal cancer microenvironment (TME) using restricted spectrum imaging (RSI) and investigate its association with tumor stroma and Ki67 as key histopathologic indicators.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study, 66 patients with rectal cancer underwent pretreatment MRI with RSI. The optimal model format was determined by Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). RSI3-derived parameters (RSI<sub>3</sub>-C1, RSI<sub>3</sub>-C2, RSI<sub>3</sub>-C3) and ADC values were measured and correlated with stroma status, Ki67 expression, and clinicopathological features. The diagnostic performance of these quantitative imaging biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three-compartment RSI model (RSI<sub>3</sub>) was optimal for characterizing rectal cancer (△BIC = 0). RSI<sub>3</sub>-C1, RSI<sub>3</sub>-C2, and RSI<sub>3</sub>-C3 showed significant differences between low-stroma and high-stroma groups (P < 0.05). RSI<sub>3</sub>-C2 exhibited the highest accuracy in characterizing stroma status (AUC = 0.800, sensitivity = 79.2%, specificity = 71.4%). All RSI<sub>3</sub> parameters and ADC values differed significantly between low-Ki67 and high-Ki67 groups (P < 0.05). RSI<sub>3</sub>-C1 demonstrated the highest accuracy in characterizing Ki67 status (AUC = 0.824, sensitivity = 90.0%, specificity = 69.4%). Significant differences were observed in RSI<sub>3</sub>-C3 and ADC values for tumor differentiation (P < 0.05). RSI<sub>3</sub>-C3 showed the highest accuracy in characterizing differentiation status (AUC = 0.721, sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSI<sub>3</sub>-derived parameters show potential as non-invasive biomarkers for evaluating TME in rectal cancer. This innovative approach may improve decision-making, leading to better patient outcomes in rectal cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04819-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the heterogeneity of the rectal cancer microenvironment (TME) using restricted spectrum imaging (RSI) and investigate its association with tumor stroma and Ki67 as key histopathologic indicators.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 66 patients with rectal cancer underwent pretreatment MRI with RSI. The optimal model format was determined by Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). RSI3-derived parameters (RSI3-C1, RSI3-C2, RSI3-C3) and ADC values were measured and correlated with stroma status, Ki67 expression, and clinicopathological features. The diagnostic performance of these quantitative imaging biomarkers was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: The three-compartment RSI model (RSI3) was optimal for characterizing rectal cancer (△BIC = 0). RSI3-C1, RSI3-C2, and RSI3-C3 showed significant differences between low-stroma and high-stroma groups (P < 0.05). RSI3-C2 exhibited the highest accuracy in characterizing stroma status (AUC = 0.800, sensitivity = 79.2%, specificity = 71.4%). All RSI3 parameters and ADC values differed significantly between low-Ki67 and high-Ki67 groups (P < 0.05). RSI3-C1 demonstrated the highest accuracy in characterizing Ki67 status (AUC = 0.824, sensitivity = 90.0%, specificity = 69.4%). Significant differences were observed in RSI3-C3 and ADC values for tumor differentiation (P < 0.05). RSI3-C3 showed the highest accuracy in characterizing differentiation status (AUC = 0.721, sensitivity = 66.7%, specificity = 83.3%).

Conclusion: RSI3-derived parameters show potential as non-invasive biomarkers for evaluating TME in rectal cancer. This innovative approach may improve decision-making, leading to better patient outcomes in rectal cancer management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:使用限制性频谱成像(RSI)探索直肠癌微环境(TME)的异质性,并研究其与作为关键组织病理学指标的肿瘤基质和Ki67的关联:在这项前瞻性研究中,66 名直肠癌患者接受了 RSI MRI 预处理。通过贝叶斯信息标准(BIC)确定了最佳模型格式。测量了 RSI3 衍生参数(RSI3-C1、RSI3-C2、RSI3-C3)和 ADC 值,并将其与基质状态、Ki67 表达和临床病理特征相关联。利用接收器操作特征(ROC)分析评估了这些定量成像生物标志物的诊断性能:结果:三区间 RSI 模型(RSI3)是描述直肠癌的最佳模型(△BIC = 0)。RSI3-C1、RSI3-C2和RSI3-C3在低基质组和高基质组之间显示出显著差异(P 3-C2在表征基质状态方面表现出最高的准确性(AUC = 0.800,灵敏度 = 79.2%,特异性 = 71.4%)。所有 RSI3 参数和 ADC 值在低 Ki67 组和高 Ki67 组之间存在显著差异(P 3-C1 在描述 Ki67 状态方面表现出最高的准确性(AUC = 0.824,灵敏度 = 90.0%,特异性 = 69.4%)。RSI3-C3 和 ADC 值在肿瘤分化方面存在显著差异(P 3-C3 在表征分化状态方面显示出最高的准确性(AUC = 0.721,灵敏度 = 66.7%,特异性 = 83.3%)):RSI3衍生参数显示出作为评估直肠癌TME的无创生物标记物的潜力。结论:RSI3 衍生参数显示出作为评估直肠癌 TME 的无创生物标记物的潜力,这种创新方法可改善决策,从而在直肠癌治疗中为患者带来更好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
LI-RADS for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced US with SonoVue and Sonazoid-a single center prospective study. Ovarian masses suggested for MRI examination: assessment of deep learning models based on non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences for predicting malignancy. Percutaneous management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries using a multistep approach: clinical, functional and long-term outcomes. Adolescent endometriosis: clinical insights and imaging considerations. Artificial intelligence for abdominopelvic trauma imaging: trends, gaps, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1