Knowledge, attitude, and practice of coronary heart disease patients towards antithrombotic therapy.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21678-8
Yingqiang Du, Xingyou Cai, Xin Hong, Yuqiong Chen, Chao Chen, Junrong Gong, Guidong Xu, Jun Zhang, Yafei Li
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice of coronary heart disease patients towards antithrombotic therapy.","authors":"Yingqiang Du, Xingyou Cai, Xin Hong, Yuqiong Chen, Chao Chen, Junrong Gong, Guidong Xu, Jun Zhang, Yafei Li","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21678-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of antithrombotic therapy in prognosticating patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial. This study evaluated the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of CHD patients regarding antithrombotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study distributed questionnaires to collect data. Participants' demographic information was recorded, and their KAP scores were assessed. The Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) measured self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 639 individuals. The median scores were as follows: knowledge score 8 (IQR 6-10), attitude score 25 (IQR 23-27), and practice score 22 (IQR 20-24). Notably, up to 70% of patients incorrectly responded to questions about dosage and administration of antithrombotic agents, and approximately 40% lacked awareness of the treatment's importance and side effects. Low practice scores were independently linked to rural residence, low attitude scores, and poor self-efficacy. Furthermore, Predictive factors for low self-efficacy included being underweight, having a high family income, a short medical history, and low attitude scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The surveyed patients with CHD exhibited good attitudes, practices, and self-efficacy but demonstrated only median knowledge levels toward antithrombotic therapy, especially about the importance and precautions associated with antithrombotic treatment. Therefore, initiatives aimed at improving adherence to antithrombotic therapy among CHD patients should focus on the knowledge gaps, especially for patients in rural areas. Improving the patient KAP could help improve the physician-patient interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21678-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The role of antithrombotic therapy in prognosticating patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial. This study evaluated the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of CHD patients regarding antithrombotic therapy.

Methods: This cross-sectional study distributed questionnaires to collect data. Participants' demographic information was recorded, and their KAP scores were assessed. The Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) measured self-efficacy.

Results: The study comprised 639 individuals. The median scores were as follows: knowledge score 8 (IQR 6-10), attitude score 25 (IQR 23-27), and practice score 22 (IQR 20-24). Notably, up to 70% of patients incorrectly responded to questions about dosage and administration of antithrombotic agents, and approximately 40% lacked awareness of the treatment's importance and side effects. Low practice scores were independently linked to rural residence, low attitude scores, and poor self-efficacy. Furthermore, Predictive factors for low self-efficacy included being underweight, having a high family income, a short medical history, and low attitude scores.

Conclusions: The surveyed patients with CHD exhibited good attitudes, practices, and self-efficacy but demonstrated only median knowledge levels toward antithrombotic therapy, especially about the importance and precautions associated with antithrombotic treatment. Therefore, initiatives aimed at improving adherence to antithrombotic therapy among CHD patients should focus on the knowledge gaps, especially for patients in rural areas. Improving the patient KAP could help improve the physician-patient interaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the risk of comorbidity onset in elderly patients after a cancer diagnosis. Environmental and health effects of the Barcelona superblocks. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease and its underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Health literacy of adolescents' responses to a workshop focusing on food, nutrition, climate change and digital technology solutions in Oceania: a multi-site pilot study in Vanuatu. Into the wild: a mixed-methods pilot study of the mental health benefits of a nature summer camp for urban children with psychological needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1