Influence of best objective response to first-line treatment on survival outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of sequential therapy with enfortumab vedotin

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1111/iju.15686
Kohei Kobatake, Keisuke Goto, Yuki Sakamoto, Kyohsuke Iwane, Kensuke Nishida, Kunihiro Hashimoto, Akihiro Asami, Hideo Iwamoto, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Kenshiro Takemoto, Miki Naito, Shunsuke Miyamoto, Yohei Sekino, Hiroyuki Kitano, Akihiro Goriki, Keisuke Hieda, Nobuyuki Hinata
{"title":"Influence of best objective response to first-line treatment on survival outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of sequential therapy with enfortumab vedotin","authors":"Kohei Kobatake,&nbsp;Keisuke Goto,&nbsp;Yuki Sakamoto,&nbsp;Kyohsuke Iwane,&nbsp;Kensuke Nishida,&nbsp;Kunihiro Hashimoto,&nbsp;Akihiro Asami,&nbsp;Hideo Iwamoto,&nbsp;Tetsutaro Hayashi,&nbsp;Kenshiro Takemoto,&nbsp;Miki Naito,&nbsp;Shunsuke Miyamoto,&nbsp;Yohei Sekino,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kitano,&nbsp;Akihiro Goriki,&nbsp;Keisuke Hieda,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Hinata","doi":"10.1111/iju.15686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated whether first-line treatment affects survival outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma undergoing sequential therapy with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enfortumab vedotin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter retrospective study included 57 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2009 and 2024. Patients received chemotherapy as a first-line treatment (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and third-line enfortumab vedotin. Assessed outcomes included overall survival and time to treatment failure. Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors for overall survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Over a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median overall survival was not reached after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine with cisplatin was selected in 31.6% of cases, while gemcitabine and carboplatin was chosen in 68.4% of cases as the first-line treatment; subsequently, 66.7% received pembrolizumab, and 33.3% received avelumab in the second-line treatment. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survivals from both first-line and enfortumab vedotin initiation than those with stable or progressive disease. In cases that achieved complete or partial responses, avelumab was more frequently selected as a second-line therapy. However, in the first-line treatment, multivariate analysis identified only stable or progressive disease as a significant predictor of worse overall survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The best response to first-line treatment predicted both overall survival from first-line initiation and outcomes following enfortumab vedotin treatment, underscoring its prognostic value in sequential therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"32 5","pages":"524-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iju.15686","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.15686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluated whether first-line treatment affects survival outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma undergoing sequential therapy with chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and enfortumab vedotin.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included 57 patients treated at Hiroshima University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2009 and 2024. Patients received chemotherapy as a first-line treatment (gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and third-line enfortumab vedotin. Assessed outcomes included overall survival and time to treatment failure. Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors for overall survival.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 20.5 months, median overall survival was not reached after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine with cisplatin was selected in 31.6% of cases, while gemcitabine and carboplatin was chosen in 68.4% of cases as the first-line treatment; subsequently, 66.7% received pembrolizumab, and 33.3% received avelumab in the second-line treatment. Patients who achieved a complete or partial response with the first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survivals from both first-line and enfortumab vedotin initiation than those with stable or progressive disease. In cases that achieved complete or partial responses, avelumab was more frequently selected as a second-line therapy. However, in the first-line treatment, multivariate analysis identified only stable or progressive disease as a significant predictor of worse overall survival.

Conclusion

The best response to first-line treatment predicted both overall survival from first-line initiation and outcomes following enfortumab vedotin treatment, underscoring its prognostic value in sequential therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线治疗最佳客观反应对晚期尿路上皮癌序贯治疗时代生存结果的影响
目的:本研究评估一线治疗是否会影响晚期尿路上皮癌患者接受化疗、免疫检查点抑制剂和维多汀序贯治疗的生存结局。方法:本多中心回顾性研究纳入2009年至2024年间在广岛大学医院及其附属机构治疗的57例患者。患者接受化疗作为一线治疗(吉西他滨加顺铂或卡铂),其次是二线免疫检查点抑制剂(派姆单抗或avelumab)和三线enfortumab vedotin。评估结果包括总生存期和治疗失败时间。Cox回归分析确定了影响总生存的预后因素。结果:在20.5个月的中位随访中,一线治疗后未达到中位总生存期。首选吉西他滨联合顺铂的占31.6%,首选吉西他滨联合卡铂的占68.4%;随后,66.7%的患者在二线治疗中接受了派姆单抗,33.3%的患者接受了avelumab。与疾病稳定或进展的患者相比,在一线治疗中获得完全或部分缓解的患者在一线和强制维多酮起始治疗时的总生存期都明显更长。在获得完全或部分缓解的病例中,avelumab更常被选为二线治疗。然而,在一线治疗中,多变量分析发现,只有稳定或进展的疾病是更差的总生存期的重要预测因子。结论:一线治疗的最佳反应预测了一线起始的总生存期和注射维多汀治疗后的预后,强调了其在晚期尿路上皮癌患者序贯治疗中的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemo-Hormonal Therapy on Reducing Recurrence in Patients With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Clinical Outcomes of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With 12 Fraction for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Editorial Comments to "Optimizing Patient Selection for Aquablation During the Initial Adoption Phase: Prostates Smaller Than 100 mL". Management of Pregnancy and Delivery After Augmentation Cystoplasty: A Novel Surgical Technique Using the Sigmoid Colon With Retroperitoneal Mesentery Placement Optimized for Cesarean Section. Concordance Between Ileal Stool Culture and Urinary Tract Infection Organisms After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Ileal Conduit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1