{"title":"Assessment of Feasibility and Outcomes of RUS Surgical Navigation System During Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses","authors":"Sangmin Lee, Hyun Young Lee, Cheryn Song","doi":"10.1111/iju.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This phase I trial evaluated the RUS 3D virtual surgical navigation system's feasibility during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In ten patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at Asan Medical Center, a 3D virtual anatomical model was reconstructed from preoperative computerized tomography scans. The 3D model was integrated with the surgeon's console through TilePro, providing manipulable virtual anatomy during surgery. Following standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy procedures performed by a single experienced surgeon using the navigation system, perioperative parameters were compared with a control group of 30 patients matched for tumor and body morphometric characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The navigation system was well integrated into the surgical workflow without technical issues, providing accurate anatomical visualization, particularly of the regional calyces and intrarenal vessel branches. The navigation group had shorter operative times (122 vs. 144.7 min) and less frequent collecting system entry (40% vs. 66.7%). For equivalent tumor size, resected specimen volume was significantly smaller in the navigation group (6.8 vs. 16.7 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.035). The navigation group also experienced a shorter hospital stay (<i>p</i> = 0.046) and a more modest decrease in glomerular filtration rate postoperatively (8.9% vs. 12.2%). There were no perioperative complications in either group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The integration of the 3D navigation system into robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was both feasible and safe, providing enhanced anatomical information while maintaining a consistent level of operative risk. The use of the navigation system resulted in reduced renal parenchymal volume resected, suggesting potential benefits in renal function preservation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"32 5","pages":"576-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This phase I trial evaluated the RUS 3D virtual surgical navigation system's feasibility during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Methods
In ten patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at Asan Medical Center, a 3D virtual anatomical model was reconstructed from preoperative computerized tomography scans. The 3D model was integrated with the surgeon's console through TilePro, providing manipulable virtual anatomy during surgery. Following standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy procedures performed by a single experienced surgeon using the navigation system, perioperative parameters were compared with a control group of 30 patients matched for tumor and body morphometric characteristics.
Results
The navigation system was well integrated into the surgical workflow without technical issues, providing accurate anatomical visualization, particularly of the regional calyces and intrarenal vessel branches. The navigation group had shorter operative times (122 vs. 144.7 min) and less frequent collecting system entry (40% vs. 66.7%). For equivalent tumor size, resected specimen volume was significantly smaller in the navigation group (6.8 vs. 16.7 cm3, p = 0.035). The navigation group also experienced a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.046) and a more modest decrease in glomerular filtration rate postoperatively (8.9% vs. 12.2%). There were no perioperative complications in either group.
Conclusions
The integration of the 3D navigation system into robot-assisted partial nephrectomy was both feasible and safe, providing enhanced anatomical information while maintaining a consistent level of operative risk. The use of the navigation system resulted in reduced renal parenchymal volume resected, suggesting potential benefits in renal function preservation.
目的:本I期试验评估RUS 3D虚拟手术导航系统在机器人辅助部分肾切除术中的可行性。方法:对在峨山医疗中心接受机器人辅助部分肾切除术的10例患者,通过术前计算机断层扫描重建三维虚拟解剖模型。3D模型通过TilePro与外科医生的控制台集成,在手术过程中提供可操作的虚拟解剖。由一名经验丰富的外科医生使用导航系统进行标准的机器人辅助部分肾切除术后,将围手术期参数与30名肿瘤和身体形态特征匹配的对照组进行比较。结果:导航系统很好地融入了手术流程,没有技术问题,提供了准确的解剖可视化,特别是区域肾盏和肾内血管分支。导航组手术时间较短(122 vs. 144.7 min),进入采集系统次数较少(40% vs. 66.7%)。在同等肿瘤大小下,导航组切除标本体积明显小于对照组(6.8 cm3 vs. 16.7 cm3, p = 0.035)。导航组的住院时间也较短(p = 0.046),术后肾小球滤过率下降幅度较小(8.9%对12.2%)。两组均无围手术期并发症。结论:将3D导航系统整合到机器人辅助的部分肾切除术中既可行又安全,在保持手术风险水平不变的同时提供了更多的解剖信息。导航系统的使用导致肾实质体积减少,提示在肾功能保存方面的潜在益处。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.