Pushing the Envelope: Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Complex Renal Calculi.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0649
Christopher Connors, Kavita Gupta, So Yeon Pak, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, Dara Lundon, Roman Shiminov, William Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"Pushing the Envelope: Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Complex Renal Calculi.","authors":"Christopher Connors, Kavita Gupta, So Yeon Pak, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, Dara Lundon, Roman Shiminov, William Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has grown in popularity for patients with smaller stone burdens and few comorbidities. Its feasibility in patients with complex renal calculi is less clear. In this study, we evaluate the safety of same-day discharge after PCNL for patients with complex renal stones when compared with those admitted after surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent PCNL for complex stones from April 2019 to January 2021 at our institution. Our practice of routinely admitting patients was changed in October 2020 largely out of necessity amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, all PCNL patients before this practice change were admitted, whereas those treated after were intended for same-day discharge. Patients were considered to have complex stones with either a Guy's Stone Score ≥3 or STONE nephrolithometry score ≥9. Baseline characteristics and rates of postoperative day 1 (POD#1) complications, 30-day complications, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, as well as stone-free rates (SFRs) were compared between ambulatory and admitted patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seventy-nine ambulatory and 111 admitted patients with complex renal calculi were included. Only one intended ambulatory patient required admission. The frequency of 30-day postoperative complications (ambulatory = 20.3%, admitted = 25.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.423) and POD#1 complications (ambulatory = 1.3%, admitted = 7.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.083) was lower among ambulatory patients, but these differences were not significant. Compared with admitted patients, the likelihood of an ED visit without readmission was significantly higher for ambulatory patients (8.9% <i>vs</i> 1.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.024), but the likelihood of readmission was lower (5.1% <i>vs</i> 9.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.222). Computed tomography-determined SFRs were similar (zero fragment rate 80.6% [ambulatory] <i>vs</i> 70.6% [admitted], <i>p</i> = 0.710). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Same-day discharge and admitted patients demonstrate similar safety profiles and SFRs after PCNL of complex renal calculi without increased risk of readmission, suggesting that ambulatory PCNL is feasible for selected higher-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has grown in popularity for patients with smaller stone burdens and few comorbidities. Its feasibility in patients with complex renal calculi is less clear. In this study, we evaluate the safety of same-day discharge after PCNL for patients with complex renal stones when compared with those admitted after surgery. Methods: We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent PCNL for complex stones from April 2019 to January 2021 at our institution. Our practice of routinely admitting patients was changed in October 2020 largely out of necessity amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, all PCNL patients before this practice change were admitted, whereas those treated after were intended for same-day discharge. Patients were considered to have complex stones with either a Guy's Stone Score ≥3 or STONE nephrolithometry score ≥9. Baseline characteristics and rates of postoperative day 1 (POD#1) complications, 30-day complications, 30-day readmissions, and 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, as well as stone-free rates (SFRs) were compared between ambulatory and admitted patients. Results: Seventy-nine ambulatory and 111 admitted patients with complex renal calculi were included. Only one intended ambulatory patient required admission. The frequency of 30-day postoperative complications (ambulatory = 20.3%, admitted = 25.2%, p = 0.423) and POD#1 complications (ambulatory = 1.3%, admitted = 7.2%, p = 0.083) was lower among ambulatory patients, but these differences were not significant. Compared with admitted patients, the likelihood of an ED visit without readmission was significantly higher for ambulatory patients (8.9% vs 1.8%, p = 0.024), but the likelihood of readmission was lower (5.1% vs 9.9%, p = 0.222). Computed tomography-determined SFRs were similar (zero fragment rate 80.6% [ambulatory] vs 70.6% [admitted], p = 0.710). Conclusions: Same-day discharge and admitted patients demonstrate similar safety profiles and SFRs after PCNL of complex renal calculi without increased risk of readmission, suggesting that ambulatory PCNL is feasible for selected higher-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战极限:经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石患者。
导读:门诊经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)在结石负担较小且合并症较少的患者中越来越受欢迎。其在复杂肾结石患者中的可行性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们评估了复杂肾结石患者PCNL术后当天出院的安全性,并与手术后入院的患者进行了比较。方法:我们回顾性地确定了2019年4月至2021年1月在我们机构接受PCNL治疗复杂结石的成年患者。我们在2020年10月改变了常规收治病人的做法,主要是出于COVID-19大流行的必要性。因此,在此做法改变之前,所有PCNL患者都入院,而在此之后接受治疗的患者则打算当天出院。Guy's Stone评分≥3或Stone肾结石测量评分≥9的患者被认为患有复杂结石。比较门诊和住院患者术后第1天(POD#1)并发症、30天并发症、30天再入院、30天急诊科(ED)就诊以及无结石率(SFRs)的基线特征和发生率。结果:包括79例门诊和111例住院的复杂肾结石患者。只有一名病人需要住院治疗。术后30天并发症发生率(门诊= 20.3%,住院= 25.2%,p = 0.423)和POD#1并发症发生率(门诊= 1.3%,住院= 7.2%,p = 0.083)在门诊患者中较低,但差异不显著。与住院患者相比,门诊患者无再入院的可能性显著高于急诊患者(8.9% vs 1.8%, p = 0.024),但再入院的可能性较低(5.1% vs 9.9%, p = 0.222)。计算机断层扫描确定的SFRs相似(零碎片率80.6%[门诊]vs 70.6%[住院],p = 0.710)。结论:复杂肾结石PCNL术后当日出院患者与入院患者表现出相似的安全性和SFRs,且不增加再入院风险,提示门诊PCNL对于选定的高危患者是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Management of Renal Stones in Pediatric Age Group Less Than 6 Years with Renal Stones Less Than 20 mm. A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Comparative Pressure Measurement Performance of the Glean Urodynamics System-a Novel Wireless and Catheter-Free Urodynamics Device. Evaluating Visual Discomfort Among Robotic Urologic Surgeons: Insights from A Survey on Eye Strain and Accommodative Lag. Is Fluoroscopy Needed for Endourologic Treatment of Ureteral and Renal Stones? Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies by the FUTURE Collaborative of the Endourological Society. Validation of a Renal Papillary Grading System: Comparison of Patients Forming Calcium Oxalate and Apatite Stones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1