Real-world evidence supporting the use of advanced hybrid closed loop in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035
Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder
{"title":"Real-world evidence supporting the use of advanced hybrid closed loop in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.","authors":"Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.

Methods: This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.

Results: Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m2.

Conclusions: Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
In humans increase in intrapancreatic adipose tissue predicts beta-cell dedifferentiation score before diabetes onset: A pilot study Psychosocial and behavioral risk patterns and risk of cardiovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes Sociodemographic inequities and use of hybrid closed-loop systems associated with obesity in youth with type 1 diabetes. NIR-II imaging-based detection of early changes in lower limb perfusion in type 2 diabetes patients without peripheral artery disease Interplay among sleep quality, dinner timing, and blood glucose control in users of advanced technologies: A study in a cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1