Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder
{"title":"Real-world evidence supporting the use of advanced hybrid closed loop in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.","authors":"Sophie Graf, Giulia Hofer, Ruth Hirschmann, Roger Lehmann, Claudia Cavelti-Weder","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"112035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The advanced hybrid closed loop (a-HCL) algorithm includes automated basal and correction bolus insulin with customizable glucose targets. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a-HCL compared to predictive low glucose suspension (PLGS) and standard hybrid closed-loop (s-HCL) systems and to identify patient populations experiencing the greatest glycemic improvement after transitioning to a-HCL.
Methods: This retrospective study included type 1 diabetes patients at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, who transitioned from PLGS or s-HCL to a-HCL between January 2020 and December 2021. Glycemic metrics, including HbA1c, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), sensor glucose (SG), and coefficient of variation (CV), were analyzed pre-and post-a-HCL implementation, considering clinical parameters influencing outcomes.
Results: Among 71 patients, a-HCL implementation significantly reduced in HbA1c (7.2 ± 0.9 % to 6.8 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), SG (8.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L to 7.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p < 0.001), TAR (26.3 % to 17.3 %, p < 0.001) and increased TIR (68.5 % to 79.8 %, p < 0.001). TBR and CV showed no significant changes. Improvements were most pronounced in patients with higher baseline HbA1c, SG, CV and lower TIR, all indicators of poor glycemic control, and a BMI > 30 kg/m2.
Conclusions: Our findings support a-HCL utilization across all patients, particularly in poorly controlled type 1 diabetes patients.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.