The Production Effect in Implicit Memory.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Experimental psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000633
Yaniv Mama
{"title":"The Production Effect in Implicit Memory.","authors":"Yaniv Mama","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169/a000633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> The Production Effect refers to a memory advantage for items learned by reading aloud relative to items learned by silent reading. The effect is commonly attributed to encoding distinctiveness; the act of production makes aloud items distinct from the silent items. Distinctiveness is considered useful only on conscious memory tests but is irrelevant on implicit tests. Indeed, hitherto, the production effect was observed only on explicit tests of memory but not on the implicit test of speeded reading. In the current study, in two experiments, participants learned words by aloud or silent reading and performed different implicit memory tests. In the first experiment, a modified recognition test using the process dissociation procedure was employed, revealing a robust production effect in the inclusion (conscious) - but not the exclusion (automatic) - condition. In the second experiment, no production effect was found in a simple implicit task (lexical decision) but was documented in two complex implicit tasks (word stem completion and category exemplar generation). These results show that vocal production can enhance some forms of implicit memory. This may result from mechanisms other than distinctiveness contributing to the production effect or the involvement of explicit memory processes (intrusions) in (some) implicit memory tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12173,"journal":{"name":"Experimental psychology","volume":"71 5","pages":"298-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Production Effect refers to a memory advantage for items learned by reading aloud relative to items learned by silent reading. The effect is commonly attributed to encoding distinctiveness; the act of production makes aloud items distinct from the silent items. Distinctiveness is considered useful only on conscious memory tests but is irrelevant on implicit tests. Indeed, hitherto, the production effect was observed only on explicit tests of memory but not on the implicit test of speeded reading. In the current study, in two experiments, participants learned words by aloud or silent reading and performed different implicit memory tests. In the first experiment, a modified recognition test using the process dissociation procedure was employed, revealing a robust production effect in the inclusion (conscious) - but not the exclusion (automatic) - condition. In the second experiment, no production effect was found in a simple implicit task (lexical decision) but was documented in two complex implicit tasks (word stem completion and category exemplar generation). These results show that vocal production can enhance some forms of implicit memory. This may result from mechanisms other than distinctiveness contributing to the production effect or the involvement of explicit memory processes (intrusions) in (some) implicit memory tests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内隐记忆的生产效应。
“产生效应”指的是通过大声朗读学习的内容相对于通过默读学习的内容具有记忆优势。这种效应通常归因于编码的独特性;生产行为使发出声音的物品与沉默的物品区别开来。独特性被认为只在意识记忆测试中有用,但在内隐测试中无关。事实上,迄今为止,生产效应只在记忆的外显测试中观察到,而在快速阅读的内隐测试中没有观察到。在目前的研究中,在两个实验中,参与者通过大声朗读或默读来学习单词,并进行了不同的内隐记忆测试。在第一个实验中,采用了一个改进的识别测试,使用过程分离程序,揭示了包含(有意识)条件下的强大生产效应-而不是排除(自动)-条件。在第二个实验中,简单的内隐任务(词汇决策)没有发现产生效应,但在两个复杂的内隐任务(词干补全和类别范例生成)中发现了产生效应。这些结果表明,发声可以增强某些形式的内隐记忆。这可能是由于除独特性以外的机制导致的生产效应,或者(某些)内隐记忆测试中涉及外显记忆过程(入侵)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental psychology
Experimental psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: As its name implies, Experimental Psychology (ISSN 1618-3169) publishes innovative, original, high-quality experimental research in psychology — quickly! It aims to provide a particularly fast outlet for such research, relying heavily on electronic exchange of information which begins with the electronic submission of manuscripts, and continues throughout the entire review and production process. The scope of the journal is defined by the experimental method, and so papers based on experiments from all areas of psychology are published. In addition to research articles, Experimental Psychology includes occasional theoretical and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Reexamining Transposed-Word Effects in the Grammatical Decision Task. Nailing Down the Perceptual Explanation of the Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting. A Network of Actions - Evaluating False Recall and Recognition of Objects After Studying Affordances. Competition Matters! Does a Child's Opinion Counterweight That of an Adult Expert?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1