Enhanced Recovery Independently Lowers Failure to Rescue After Colorectal Surgery.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000003655
Marco Catarci, Giacomo Ruffo, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Gianluca Garulli, Maurizio Pavanello, Marco Scatizzi, Vincenzo Bottino, Stefano Guadagni
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery Independently Lowers Failure to Rescue After Colorectal Surgery.","authors":"Marco Catarci, Giacomo Ruffo, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Gianluca Garulli, Maurizio Pavanello, Marco Scatizzi, Vincenzo Bottino, Stefano Guadagni","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway reduces morbidity and mortality rates after elective colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on the failure to rescue rates after elective colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a prospective database.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (≥ 18 years old) who underwent elective colorectal resection with anastomosis for benign and malignant disease.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Prospective enrolment in 78 centers in Italy from 2019 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All the outcomes were measured at 60 days after surgery. Several patient-, disease-, treatment-, hospital-, and complication-related variables were analyzed for the outcomes. After univariate analyses, independent predictors of the endpoints were identified through logistic regression analyses, presenting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Failure to rescue after any adverse event, defined as the ratio between the number of deaths and the number of patients showing any adverse event; failure to rescue after any major adverse event, with the denominator represented by the number of patients showing any major adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An adverse event was recorded in 2,321 out of 8,359 patients (27.8%), a major adverse event in 523 patients (6.3%), and death in 88 patients (1.0%). The failure to rescue rates were 3.8% after any adverse event and 16.8% after any major adverse event. Independent predictors of primary endpoints were identified among patient- (age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, nutritional status), treatment- (type of resection), and complication-related (anastomotic leakage, reoperation) variables. Enhanced recovery pathway adherence > 70% independently reduced failure to rescue rates.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Clustering from multicenter data, and unmeasured confounding from observational data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following elective colorectal resection, adherence > 70% to the enhanced recovery pathway independently decreased failure to rescue rates, along with other patient- or treatment-related factors. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway reduces morbidity and mortality rates after elective colorectal surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway on the failure to rescue rates after elective colorectal surgery.

Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

Patients: Adults (≥ 18 years old) who underwent elective colorectal resection with anastomosis for benign and malignant disease.

Settings: Prospective enrolment in 78 centers in Italy from 2019 to 2021.

Interventions: All the outcomes were measured at 60 days after surgery. Several patient-, disease-, treatment-, hospital-, and complication-related variables were analyzed for the outcomes. After univariate analyses, independent predictors of the endpoints were identified through logistic regression analyses, presenting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Main outcome measures: Failure to rescue after any adverse event, defined as the ratio between the number of deaths and the number of patients showing any adverse event; failure to rescue after any major adverse event, with the denominator represented by the number of patients showing any major adverse event.

Results: An adverse event was recorded in 2,321 out of 8,359 patients (27.8%), a major adverse event in 523 patients (6.3%), and death in 88 patients (1.0%). The failure to rescue rates were 3.8% after any adverse event and 16.8% after any major adverse event. Independent predictors of primary endpoints were identified among patient- (age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, nutritional status), treatment- (type of resection), and complication-related (anastomotic leakage, reoperation) variables. Enhanced recovery pathway adherence > 70% independently reduced failure to rescue rates.

Limitations: Clustering from multicenter data, and unmeasured confounding from observational data.

Conclusions: Following elective colorectal resection, adherence > 70% to the enhanced recovery pathway independently decreased failure to rescue rates, along with other patient- or treatment-related factors. See Video Abstract.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
期刊最新文献
The Readability, Actionability, and Accessibility of Hemorrhoid-Focused Online Patient Education Materials: Are We Adequately Addressing Patient Concerns? Comparison of Rubber Band Ligation and Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Grade III: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial. Clip-and-Lift Retraction Technique During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Jejunal Lymphatic and Vascular Anatomy Defines Surgical Principles for Treatment of Jejunal Tumors. Outreach - A World of Possibilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1