Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of an IDegAsp biosimilar versus the originator in healthy Chinese volunteers.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert opinion on investigational drugs Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1080/13543784.2025.2463085
Hui Liu, Yang Xiong, Xinlei Chen, Hongling Yu, Li Lan, Wengang He, Wenjia Wang, Yulei Zhuang, Li Deng, Kanghua Huang, Linfeng Guo, Yerong Yu
{"title":"Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of an IDegAsp biosimilar versus the originator in healthy Chinese volunteers.","authors":"Hui Liu, Yang Xiong, Xinlei Chen, Hongling Yu, Li Lan, Wengang He, Wenjia Wang, Yulei Zhuang, Li Deng, Kanghua Huang, Linfeng Guo, Yerong Yu","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2025.2463085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>22011 is an insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation (IDegAsp) that shares an identical amino acid sequence with Ryzodeg, the originator IDegAsp. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of 22,011 with Ryzodeg.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover, euglycemic clamp study, healthy Chinese adults were randomized to receive 0.5 U/kg of 22,011 and Ryzodeg under fasting conditions. PK was evaluated for up to 120 hours and PD (represented by glucose infusion rate [GIR]) was assessed for up to 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 46 subjects randomized, all completed both treatment periods and were included in the PK/PD and safety analysis set. Insulin exposure (AUC<sub>IDeg, 0-24 h</sub>, AUC<sub>IAsp, 0-12 h</sub>, and C<sub>max, IAsp</sub>) and activity (GIR<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>GIR, 0-24 h</sub>) were comparable (estimates of treatment ratios 0.916 ~ 1.076 for primary PK parameters and 0.946 ~ 1.037 for primary PD parameters), with 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of least square means falling within the range of 0.80 ~ 1.25. Adverse events were similar for both products and no significant safety concerns were noted in the laboratory results, vital signs, or electrocardiogram.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the PK/PD similarity of 22,011 to Ryzodeg with a comparable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2025.2463085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: 22011 is an insulin degludec/insulin aspart co-formulation (IDegAsp) that shares an identical amino acid sequence with Ryzodeg, the originator IDegAsp. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of 22,011 with Ryzodeg.

Methods: In a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover, euglycemic clamp study, healthy Chinese adults were randomized to receive 0.5 U/kg of 22,011 and Ryzodeg under fasting conditions. PK was evaluated for up to 120 hours and PD (represented by glucose infusion rate [GIR]) was assessed for up to 24 hours.

Results: Of 46 subjects randomized, all completed both treatment periods and were included in the PK/PD and safety analysis set. Insulin exposure (AUCIDeg, 0-24 h, AUCIAsp, 0-12 h, and Cmax, IAsp) and activity (GIRmax and AUCGIR, 0-24 h) were comparable (estimates of treatment ratios 0.916 ~ 1.076 for primary PK parameters and 0.946 ~ 1.037 for primary PD parameters), with 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of least square means falling within the range of 0.80 ~ 1.25. Adverse events were similar for both products and no significant safety concerns were noted in the laboratory results, vital signs, or electrocardiogram.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the PK/PD similarity of 22,011 to Ryzodeg with a comparable safety profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.
期刊最新文献
CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab for late antibody-mediated rejection: a phase II drug evaluation. Tumor immunology and immunotherapy for endometrial cancer. Investigational gene expression inhibitors for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity of an IDegAsp biosimilar versus the originator in healthy Chinese volunteers. Early investigational agents for the treatment of rosacea: drugs in phase I and II clinical development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1