Reporting on the "Next Generation of Nicotine Addicts": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of How the Australian Media has Covered and Constructed Youth Vaping (2018-2023).

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2025.2458648
Samuel Brookfield, Nathan A Chye, Nicholas Carah, Coral Gartner
{"title":"Reporting on the <i>\"Next Generation of Nicotine Addicts\"</i>: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of How the Australian Media has Covered and Constructed Youth Vaping (2018-2023).","authors":"Samuel Brookfield, Nathan A Chye, Nicholas Carah, Coral Gartner","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2458648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In May 2023, the Australian Federal Government announced further restrictions on the sale of vaping devices, partly due to concern over widespread use by young people. We conducted a mixed methods study to examine how youth vaping has been reported in the Australian news media and compare these articles to media guidelines on responsible reporting of drug use. Drawing a sample from the Factiva database, we conducted quantitative content analysis on stories published in the Australian news media from 2018 to 2023, comparing them against guidelines published by the organization <i>Mindframe</i>. We also conducted a qualitative social semiotic analysis on four exemplar articles purposively sampled from a 10% subset of the articles analyzed in the content analysis. The content analysis sample included 410 articles. News Corp published 242 stories compared to 74 for Nine Entertainment, 69 for independent sources, 19 for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and six for the Australian Associated Press. News Corp also recorded the highest prevalence of sensationalist language (43.8%), and the lowest frequency of seeking expert opinion (57.9%) or including help-seeking information (4.1%). The qualitative image analysis demonstrated how stock and promotional photography can sometimes glamourise vaping in ways that are reductive and emotive, while also being potentially promotional for younger audiences. The risks of sensationalist coverage include normalizing youth vaping, increased public confusion regarding the likely relative risks of vaping and smoking, and an emphasis on policies that focus on narrow policy goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"2431-2444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2458648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In May 2023, the Australian Federal Government announced further restrictions on the sale of vaping devices, partly due to concern over widespread use by young people. We conducted a mixed methods study to examine how youth vaping has been reported in the Australian news media and compare these articles to media guidelines on responsible reporting of drug use. Drawing a sample from the Factiva database, we conducted quantitative content analysis on stories published in the Australian news media from 2018 to 2023, comparing them against guidelines published by the organization Mindframe. We also conducted a qualitative social semiotic analysis on four exemplar articles purposively sampled from a 10% subset of the articles analyzed in the content analysis. The content analysis sample included 410 articles. News Corp published 242 stories compared to 74 for Nine Entertainment, 69 for independent sources, 19 for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and six for the Australian Associated Press. News Corp also recorded the highest prevalence of sensationalist language (43.8%), and the lowest frequency of seeking expert opinion (57.9%) or including help-seeking information (4.1%). The qualitative image analysis demonstrated how stock and promotional photography can sometimes glamourise vaping in ways that are reductive and emotive, while also being potentially promotional for younger audiences. The risks of sensationalist coverage include normalizing youth vaping, increased public confusion regarding the likely relative risks of vaping and smoking, and an emphasis on policies that focus on narrow policy goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报道“下一代尼古丁成瘾者”:对澳大利亚媒体如何报道和构建青少年电子烟(2018-2023)的混合方法分析。
2023年5月,澳大利亚联邦政府宣布进一步限制电子烟的销售,部分原因是担心年轻人广泛使用电子烟。我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以研究澳大利亚新闻媒体是如何报道青少年吸电子烟的,并将这些文章与媒体关于负责任报道吸毒的指导方针进行比较。我们从Factiva数据库中抽取样本,对2018年至2023年澳大利亚新闻媒体发表的报道进行了定量内容分析,并将其与Mindframe组织发布的指南进行了比较。我们还对四篇范例文章进行了定性的社会符号学分析,这些文章有目的地从内容分析中分析的10%的文章子集中抽样。内容分析样本包括410篇文章。新闻集团发表了242篇报道,相比之下,Nine Entertainment发表了74篇,独立消息来源发表了69篇,澳大利亚广播公司发表了19篇,澳大利亚美联社发表了6篇。新闻集团还记录了耸人听闻的语言的最高流行率(43.8%),寻求专家意见(57.9%)或包括求助信息(4.1%)的频率最低。定性图像分析表明,库存和促销摄影有时可以以还原和情绪化的方式吸引电子烟,同时也可能吸引年轻受众。耸人听闻的报道的风险包括使青少年吸电子烟正常化,增加公众对电子烟和吸烟可能存在的相对风险的困惑,以及强调专注于狭隘政策目标的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
A Metaphor is Sóóó Creative but Unclear: Effects of Metaphorical Health-Campaign Slogans and Markers on Creativity, Clarity, and Appreciation. Navigating Between Involving and Advising Clients: An Analysis of Dietitians' Advisory Practices Within Shared Decision-Making Processes. Affective Contextures of Collective Care: Nurse-To-Nurse Communication, Resilience, and Sustainability in Nursing Work. "Mad, Mentally Ill, Permanently Unstable"? A Culture-Centered Approach to Jinn Possession Stigmas and Management Strategies Among Nigerian Muslims. Returning to School Safely: A COVID-19 RCCE Initiative in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1