Real-world efficacy and tolerability of CAB+RPV LA in women: addressing the gender gap in HIV treatment research.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf038
Marta Rosas Cancio-Suárez, Ana Moreno, Santos Del Campo Terrón, María Jesús Vivancos, Alejandro G García-Ruiz De Morales, Javier Martínez-Sanz, Raquel Ron, Sofía Sánchez-Izquierdo, Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, Santiago Moreno, María Jesús Pérez-Elías
{"title":"Real-world efficacy and tolerability of CAB+RPV LA in women: addressing the gender gap in HIV treatment research.","authors":"Marta Rosas Cancio-Suárez, Ana Moreno, Santos Del Campo Terrón, María Jesús Vivancos, Alejandro G García-Ruiz De Morales, Javier Martínez-Sanz, Raquel Ron, Sofía Sánchez-Izquierdo, Manuel Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés, Santiago Moreno, María Jesús Pérez-Elías","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women, particularly those of advanced age with comorbidities and polypharmacy, are often underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens like cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB + RPV LA). This single-center study aims to address this gap by assessing the effectiveness, tolerability, and adherence to CAB + RPV LA, focusing on women who often have complex health profiles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed virologic suppression rates, adherence and tolerability in our cohort of women living with HIV comparing their outcomes to men on the same regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 270 individuals (42 women and 228 men) were included. Women had a higher prevalence of comorbidities (86% versus 49%, P = 0.0001), and were more likely to have used ≥5 ART lines (69% versus 29%, P < 0.0001), and 31% were aged ≥60 years compared to 13% of men (P = 0.003). Despite higher rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy, women achieved virologic suppression and adherence levels comparable to men. CAB + RPV LA was well-tolerated in both groups, with no significant gender-based differences in treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAB + RPV LA is effective and well-tolerated in women with complex ART histories, providing a viable long-acting alternative for populations traditionally underrepresented in clinical trials. These findings underscore the importance of including women in studies of novel ART regimens to ensure equitable access and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women, particularly those of advanced age with comorbidities and polypharmacy, are often underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating long-acting (LA) antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens like cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CAB + RPV LA). This single-center study aims to address this gap by assessing the effectiveness, tolerability, and adherence to CAB + RPV LA, focusing on women who often have complex health profiles.

Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, we analyzed virologic suppression rates, adherence and tolerability in our cohort of women living with HIV comparing their outcomes to men on the same regimen.

Results: A total of 270 individuals (42 women and 228 men) were included. Women had a higher prevalence of comorbidities (86% versus 49%, P = 0.0001), and were more likely to have used ≥5 ART lines (69% versus 29%, P < 0.0001), and 31% were aged ≥60 years compared to 13% of men (P = 0.003). Despite higher rates of comorbidities and polypharmacy, women achieved virologic suppression and adherence levels comparable to men. CAB + RPV LA was well-tolerated in both groups, with no significant gender-based differences in treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: CAB + RPV LA is effective and well-tolerated in women with complex ART histories, providing a viable long-acting alternative for populations traditionally underrepresented in clinical trials. These findings underscore the importance of including women in studies of novel ART regimens to ensure equitable access and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the appropriateness of antifungal prescribing: key results from the implementation of a novel audit tool in Australian hospitals. Pharmacokinetics and safety of rifapentine in children: dosing for latent tuberculosis infection. Simulated exposures of oritavancin in in vitro pharmacodynamic models select for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to oritavancin but minimal cross-resistance or seesaw effect with other antimicrobials. Real-world efficacy and tolerability of CAB+RPV LA in women: addressing the gender gap in HIV treatment research. Durability of doravirine/dolutegravir dual combination in a multicentre cohort of elderly people with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1