A Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Follow-Up in the New England Area for Pediatric Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.
Zoe Schefter, William P Knapp, Elsie Helou, Kathleen Jay, Michael R Epstein, Edward O'Leary, Felicia Tam, Shailendra Upadhyay, Bridget Boss, Niels Giddins, Audrey Dionne, Kerry Burke, Kathleen M Rotondo, Elizabeth S DeWitt, David Kane, Anna Tsirka, Douglas Y Mah
{"title":"A Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Follow-Up in the New England Area for Pediatric Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.","authors":"Zoe Schefter, William P Knapp, Elsie Helou, Kathleen Jay, Michael R Epstein, Edward O'Leary, Felicia Tam, Shailendra Upadhyay, Bridget Boss, Niels Giddins, Audrey Dionne, Kerry Burke, Kathleen M Rotondo, Elizabeth S DeWitt, David Kane, Anna Tsirka, Douglas Y Mah","doi":"10.1111/jce.16594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) continues to grow. Despite the presence of implanted hardware, patient compliance with in-clinic visits and remote transmissions is poor. We performed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to assess and optimize CIED follow-up in the New England area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A regional network of eight pediatric institutions was created. All patients with CIEDs were identified starting in 2016. Noncompliance was defined as: no in-person evaluation within 1 year, or no remote transmission within 6 months. Interventions performed included automated texts/emails, certified letters, and personal phone calls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 612 patients were identified, with the total number of patients increasing over the 5-year QI period as patients had devices implanted and removed. Initial noncompliance with in-person annual follow-up was 29%. If patients were noncompliant, a personal phone call was made, reminding them to return to clinic. If the patient could not be reached for 3 months, a certified letter was sent. The noncompliance rate decreased to 5% over the first year and remained around this level over the QI period (3%-9%). For remote transmissions, 54% of patients were noncompliant. Interventions were performed on subgroups of patients. Automated texts/emails were trialed in 126; after 6 months, 41% of these patients remained noncompliant. Phone calls were then trialed on 87 patients. Over 6 months, noncompliance decreased to 11%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CIEDs have poor compliance with regular follow-up. Patients have a limited response to automated measures (texts/emails). Personal phone calls had the greatest impact in improving compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) continues to grow. Despite the presence of implanted hardware, patient compliance with in-clinic visits and remote transmissions is poor. We performed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to assess and optimize CIED follow-up in the New England area.
Methods: A regional network of eight pediatric institutions was created. All patients with CIEDs were identified starting in 2016. Noncompliance was defined as: no in-person evaluation within 1 year, or no remote transmission within 6 months. Interventions performed included automated texts/emails, certified letters, and personal phone calls.
Results: A total of 612 patients were identified, with the total number of patients increasing over the 5-year QI period as patients had devices implanted and removed. Initial noncompliance with in-person annual follow-up was 29%. If patients were noncompliant, a personal phone call was made, reminding them to return to clinic. If the patient could not be reached for 3 months, a certified letter was sent. The noncompliance rate decreased to 5% over the first year and remained around this level over the QI period (3%-9%). For remote transmissions, 54% of patients were noncompliant. Interventions were performed on subgroups of patients. Automated texts/emails were trialed in 126; after 6 months, 41% of these patients remained noncompliant. Phone calls were then trialed on 87 patients. Over 6 months, noncompliance decreased to 11%.
Conclusions: Patients with CIEDs have poor compliance with regular follow-up. Patients have a limited response to automated measures (texts/emails). Personal phone calls had the greatest impact in improving compliance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.