Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A qualitative study on the views of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00415-025-12912-9
Sonja Rutten, Abigail Bradley-Westguard, Timothy R Nicholson, Susannah Pick
{"title":"Outcome measurement in functional neurological disorder: A qualitative study on the views of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals.","authors":"Sonja Rutten, Abigail Bradley-Westguard, Timothy R Nicholson, Susannah Pick","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12912-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this qualitative study, we aimed to obtain and synthesise the views of patients with functional neurological disorder (FND), their caregivers, and relevant healthcare professionals (HCPs) on outcome measurement in FND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 FND patients, 18 caregivers and 21 HCPs, sampled purposively in the United Kingdom. Transcripts were analysed through inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whilst reduction or resolution of FND symptoms were frequently mentioned as important treatment goals in all groups, this was reported by a larger proportion of caregivers and HCPs than patients. Patients most frequently hoped for improvements in mental health/well-being. Other important treatment goals were resuming work, and an increase in independence, self-management or self-efficacy. Of the 20 domains deemed relevant for outcome assessment, improvements in FND symptoms, emotional well-being, activities of daily living and quality-of-life, were mentioned most frequently. None of the participants thought that outcome assessment should be purely clinician-rated or objective; all believed that the patient's subjective experience should be central. Nevertheless, participants in all groups acknowledged that clinician-rated or objective OMIs have added value in clinical outcome assessment. The benefits of digital outcome assessment were also mentioned by several participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to capture the views of key stakeholders on outcome assessment in FND. The findings indicate that outcome measures for FND should be patient-centred, whilst also including HCP opinion. Critical domains for assessment are FND symptoms, mental health, quality-of-life and the ability to perform activities of daily living.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12912-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this qualitative study, we aimed to obtain and synthesise the views of patients with functional neurological disorder (FND), their caregivers, and relevant healthcare professionals (HCPs) on outcome measurement in FND.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 FND patients, 18 caregivers and 21 HCPs, sampled purposively in the United Kingdom. Transcripts were analysed through inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Whilst reduction or resolution of FND symptoms were frequently mentioned as important treatment goals in all groups, this was reported by a larger proportion of caregivers and HCPs than patients. Patients most frequently hoped for improvements in mental health/well-being. Other important treatment goals were resuming work, and an increase in independence, self-management or self-efficacy. Of the 20 domains deemed relevant for outcome assessment, improvements in FND symptoms, emotional well-being, activities of daily living and quality-of-life, were mentioned most frequently. None of the participants thought that outcome assessment should be purely clinician-rated or objective; all believed that the patient's subjective experience should be central. Nevertheless, participants in all groups acknowledged that clinician-rated or objective OMIs have added value in clinical outcome assessment. The benefits of digital outcome assessment were also mentioned by several participants.

Conclusions: This is the first study to capture the views of key stakeholders on outcome assessment in FND. The findings indicate that outcome measures for FND should be patient-centred, whilst also including HCP opinion. Critical domains for assessment are FND symptoms, mental health, quality-of-life and the ability to perform activities of daily living.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性神经障碍的结果测量:一项关于患者、护理人员和卫生保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
背景:在这项定性研究中,我们旨在获得并综合功能性神经障碍(FND)患者、其护理人员和相关医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对FND结果测量的看法。方法:在英国对22名FND患者、18名护理人员和21名HCPs进行了半结构化访谈。通过归纳主题分析对转录本进行分析。结果:虽然FND症状的减轻或缓解在所有组中都经常被提及为重要的治疗目标,但护理人员和HCPs报告的比例大于患者。患者最常希望改善心理健康/幸福。其他重要的治疗目标是恢复工作,增加独立性,自我管理或自我效能。在被认为与结果评估相关的20个领域中,FND症状、情绪健康、日常生活活动和生活质量的改善被提及最多。没有一个参与者认为结果评估应该纯粹由临床医生评定或客观;所有人都认为病人的主观体验应该是中心。然而,所有组的参与者都承认,临床评定的或客观的OMIs在临床结果评估中增加了价值。数位与会者还提到了数字结果评估的好处。结论:这是第一个捕捉关键利益相关者对FND结果评估观点的研究。研究结果表明,FND的结果测量应以患者为中心,同时也包括HCP的意见。评估的关键领域是FND症状、心理健康、生活质量和进行日常生活活动的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
期刊最新文献
Predicting disease progression in multiple sclerosis with clinically accessible information and technology. The association of night shift work with the risk of acute ischemic cerebrovascular syndrome: a longitudinal study of 204,261 UK Biobank participants. Corneal edema: an underrecognized safety risk of amantadine. Correlations between peripheral neuropathy profiles and vascular skin lesions. Enhanced antibody detection via live cell-based assay among RIA negative myasthenia gravis patients: toward improved diagnosis and clinical correlates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1