Yuri Aleksander-Ivanov, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Lidia Cheidde, Gabriel Nery Lima, Carolina Carvalho Soares Valentim, Michel Sebba Chater, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Jaime Guedes
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of 0.1% Cyclosporine Solutions in Dry Eye Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Yuri Aleksander-Ivanov, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Lidia Cheidde, Gabriel Nery Lima, Carolina Carvalho Soares Valentim, Michel Sebba Chater, Denisse J Mora-Paez, Jaime Guedes","doi":"10.1089/jop.2024.0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a primary treatment for dry eye disease (DED). Ophthalmic solutions containing CsA are available in concentrations of 0.05%, 0.09%, and 0.1%. While 0.1% CsA solutions have been used to treat DED, their safety and effectiveness remains somewhat uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their safety and efficacy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 0.1% CsA solutions with their vehicle. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We included six RCTs (2,170 patients) with follow-up periods ranging from 4 weeks to 6 months. A total of 1,119 patients (51.56%) with DED were treated with 0.1% CsA. The mean age of patients was 57.9 ± 4.8 years, with 79.7% being female. The total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) at last follow-up [mean differences (MD) -0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.73, -0.24); <i>P</i> < 0.0001], at 4 weeks [MD -0.64; 95% CI (-1.07, -0.22); <i>P =</i> 0.003], and central corneal fluorescein staining (cCFS) [MD -0.19; 95% CI (-0.35, -0.03); <i>P =</i> 0.02] scores were lower in patients treated with 0.1% CsA compared with vehicle. The Lissamine Green conjunctival staining (LGCS) [MD -0.51; 95% CI (-0.78, -0.24); <i>P =</i> 0.0002] and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores [MD -3.04; 95% CI (-5.84, -0.23); <i>P =</i> 0.03] were lower in the 0.1% CsA group compared with vehicle. Adverse events associated with 0.1% CsA solution in the treatment of DED varied across studies, but were generally mild to moderate. Notably, similar events were also significantly present in the vehicle group, supporting the safety profile of this treatment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Ophthalmic 0.1% CsA seems safe for treating DED, and significantly reduced tCFS, cCFS, LGCS, and OSDI scores compared with vehicle solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2024.0169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a primary treatment for dry eye disease (DED). Ophthalmic solutions containing CsA are available in concentrations of 0.05%, 0.09%, and 0.1%. While 0.1% CsA solutions have been used to treat DED, their safety and effectiveness remains somewhat uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their safety and efficacy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 0.1% CsA solutions with their vehicle. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1. Results: We included six RCTs (2,170 patients) with follow-up periods ranging from 4 weeks to 6 months. A total of 1,119 patients (51.56%) with DED were treated with 0.1% CsA. The mean age of patients was 57.9 ± 4.8 years, with 79.7% being female. The total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) at last follow-up [mean differences (MD) -0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.73, -0.24); P < 0.0001], at 4 weeks [MD -0.64; 95% CI (-1.07, -0.22); P = 0.003], and central corneal fluorescein staining (cCFS) [MD -0.19; 95% CI (-0.35, -0.03); P = 0.02] scores were lower in patients treated with 0.1% CsA compared with vehicle. The Lissamine Green conjunctival staining (LGCS) [MD -0.51; 95% CI (-0.78, -0.24); P = 0.0002] and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores [MD -3.04; 95% CI (-5.84, -0.23); P = 0.03] were lower in the 0.1% CsA group compared with vehicle. Adverse events associated with 0.1% CsA solution in the treatment of DED varied across studies, but were generally mild to moderate. Notably, similar events were also significantly present in the vehicle group, supporting the safety profile of this treatment. Conclusion: Ophthalmic 0.1% CsA seems safe for treating DED, and significantly reduced tCFS, cCFS, LGCS, and OSDI scores compared with vehicle solutions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders.
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes:
Glaucoma
Cataracts
Retinal degeneration
Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology
Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation
Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials
Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders
Gene and cell-based therapies
Ocular metabolic disorders
Ocular ischemia and blood flow
Proliferative disorders of the eye
Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.