Comparing the impact of combined and aerobic exercise on blood pressure in women with prehypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16599-7
Ignatio R Haryono, Nawanto A Prastowo
{"title":"Comparing the impact of combined and aerobic exercise on blood pressure in women with prehypertension: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ignatio R Haryono, Nawanto A Prastowo","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16599-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on the effectiveness of combined exercise over aerobic exercise alone in lowering blood pressure (BP) remains limited. This study compared the effectiveness of combined aerobic plus resistance training versus aerobic training alone, with both interventions matched for exercise duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial included thirty-one female participants eligible for final analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: 15 to the Control (C) group, which underwent 8 weeks of aerobics, and 16 to the Combined Training (CT) group, which underwent 8 weeks of combined training. Outcome measures included weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), hand grip strength (HGS), and performance on the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30-s CST). These variables were assessed at baseline and at the end of week 8. Two-way ANOVA followed Tukey post-hoc was applied to analyze changes within and between groups over time. The effect size was calculated using partial eta squared (η<inf>p</inf><sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar across groups, except for heart rate. Both groups showed significant reductions in SBP and DBP after the intervention ([C: SBP decreased by -7.4±2.2, P=0.00; DBP decreased by -5.1±2.4, P=0.00] [CT: SBP decreased by -6.1±2.1, P<0.01, and DBP decreased by -6.9±2.0, P<0.01]). The reduction in SBP was more pronounced in the C than in the CT (P=0.04), while the reduction in DBP was greater in the CT group (P=0.04). An improvement in the outcome variable is caused by the \"group\" or \"time\" effect but not by the effect of \"group × time.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding resistance training to aerobic exercise enhances the reduction in diastolic blood pressure compared to aerobic exercise alone in prehypertension middle-aged women.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":"701-707"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16599-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence on the effectiveness of combined exercise over aerobic exercise alone in lowering blood pressure (BP) remains limited. This study compared the effectiveness of combined aerobic plus resistance training versus aerobic training alone, with both interventions matched for exercise duration.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included thirty-one female participants eligible for final analysis. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: 15 to the Control (C) group, which underwent 8 weeks of aerobics, and 16 to the Combined Training (CT) group, which underwent 8 weeks of combined training. Outcome measures included weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), hand grip strength (HGS), and performance on the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30-s CST). These variables were assessed at baseline and at the end of week 8. Two-way ANOVA followed Tukey post-hoc was applied to analyze changes within and between groups over time. The effect size was calculated using partial eta squared (ηp2).

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across groups, except for heart rate. Both groups showed significant reductions in SBP and DBP after the intervention ([C: SBP decreased by -7.4±2.2, P=0.00; DBP decreased by -5.1±2.4, P=0.00] [CT: SBP decreased by -6.1±2.1, P<0.01, and DBP decreased by -6.9±2.0, P<0.01]). The reduction in SBP was more pronounced in the C than in the CT (P=0.04), while the reduction in DBP was greater in the CT group (P=0.04). An improvement in the outcome variable is caused by the "group" or "time" effect but not by the effect of "group × time."

Conclusions: Adding resistance training to aerobic exercise enhances the reduction in diastolic blood pressure compared to aerobic exercise alone in prehypertension middle-aged women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较联合运动和有氧运动对高血压前期女性血压的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:联合运动比单独有氧运动在降低血压(BP)方面的有效性证据仍然有限。这项研究比较了有氧加阻力训练与单独有氧训练的效果,两种干预措施的运动时间相匹配。方法:本随机对照试验纳入31名符合最终分析条件的女性受试者。参与者被随机分为两组:对照组(C) 15人,进行8周的有氧运动;联合训练组(CT) 16人,进行8周的联合训练。结果测量包括体重、身高、身体质量指数(BMI)、收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉压(PP)、握力(HGS)以及30秒椅子站立测试(30-s CST)的表现。在基线和第8周结束时对这些变量进行评估。采用双向方差分析,分析组内和组间随时间的变化。效应大小用偏eta平方(ηp2)计算。结果:各组基线特征相似,心率除外。两组干预后收缩压和舒张压均显著降低([C]:收缩压下降-7.4±2.2,P=0.00;舒张压下降-5.1±2.4,P=0.00] [CT:收缩压下降-6.1±2.1,P]结论:与单纯有氧运动相比,有氧运动中加入阻力训练能促进高血压前期中年妇女舒张压的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Use of smart socks to identify different skating styles in professional inline speed skate athletes. The 30-15 intermittent fitness test in young elite male soccer players: evaluating aerobic performance in relation to maturity offset. Multidisciplinary oversight in sports eligibility: a medico-legal perspective from a regional appeal commission in Italy. Interest of carbohydrate consumption during endurance exercise: a systematic review of systematic and meta-analyses of RCTs. The return to running of female soccer players postpartum: timing, prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and urinary incontinence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1