[Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]

Q3 Medicine Recenti progressi in medicina Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1701/4450.44440
Monica Zedda
{"title":"[Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]","authors":"Monica Zedda","doi":"10.1701/4450.44440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article traces the history and evolution of the Open Access (OA) Movement, officially lunched in 2001 with the Budapest Conference and solidified in 2003 with the Berlin Declaration. The OA Movement advocates for free and unrestricted access to publicly funded research results, asserting that scientific knowledge should be accessible to everyone without legal, economic, or technological barriers. The two main pathways for OA are outlined: self-archiving (green road) and publishing in entirely OA journals (gold road). The work also explores the concept of transformative journals and transformative agreements, designed to facilitate the transition of scientific journals to OA, even if with controversial and problematic outcomes. Additionally, the challenges and distortions of the publishing industry are analyzed, particularly the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (APCs) and the new OA strategies. The importance of alternative publishing models, such as diamond journals and OA platforms, is highlighted to promote more equitable and sustainable scientific communication. The role of major research funding bodies, including the European Commission and cOAlition S, is examined regarding policies and mandates for OA, emphasizing the need for a common commitment to overcome current legal and economic barriers. The article concludes that despite the progress made, many challenges remain unresolved. It calls for greater involvement of all stakeholders to implement concrete measures for awareness and support of OA. Only through collaboration at the political and institutional levels will it be possible to reshape the future of scientific publishing, break the oligopoly of major commercial publishers, and enable more democratic access to scientific knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 2","pages":"89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4450.44440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article traces the history and evolution of the Open Access (OA) Movement, officially lunched in 2001 with the Budapest Conference and solidified in 2003 with the Berlin Declaration. The OA Movement advocates for free and unrestricted access to publicly funded research results, asserting that scientific knowledge should be accessible to everyone without legal, economic, or technological barriers. The two main pathways for OA are outlined: self-archiving (green road) and publishing in entirely OA journals (gold road). The work also explores the concept of transformative journals and transformative agreements, designed to facilitate the transition of scientific journals to OA, even if with controversial and problematic outcomes. Additionally, the challenges and distortions of the publishing industry are analyzed, particularly the rising costs of Article Processing Charges (APCs) and the new OA strategies. The importance of alternative publishing models, such as diamond journals and OA platforms, is highlighted to promote more equitable and sustainable scientific communication. The role of major research funding bodies, including the European Commission and cOAlition S, is examined regarding policies and mandates for OA, emphasizing the need for a common commitment to overcome current legal and economic barriers. The article concludes that despite the progress made, many challenges remain unresolved. It calls for greater involvement of all stakeholders to implement concrete measures for awareness and support of OA. Only through collaboration at the political and institutional levels will it be possible to reshape the future of scientific publishing, break the oligopoly of major commercial publishers, and enable more democratic access to scientific knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
期刊最新文献
[Beyond quantity: rethinking quality and integrity in scientific research.] [Experience of therapy with axi-cel CAR-T in an elderly patient suffering from double expressor DLBCL in an advanced stage and refractory to first-line chemoimmunotherapy.] [From modern science to open science, publishing in the scientific field: copyright, Creative Commons and… beyond.] [In adults with knee osteoarthritis, methotrexate offers minimal pain relief.] [Making open access: history, developments and new challenges.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1