Comparison of GLI-2021 standards with ECSC standards for static lung volume interpretation in patients with respiratory diseases.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107988
Pierre-Marie Wardyn, Virginie de Broucker, Thierry Perez, Silvia Demoulin-Alexikova, Jean-Louis Edme, Sébastien Hulo
{"title":"Comparison of GLI-2021 standards with ECSC standards for static lung volume interpretation in patients with respiratory diseases.","authors":"Pierre-Marie Wardyn, Virginie de Broucker, Thierry Perez, Silvia Demoulin-Alexikova, Jean-Louis Edme, Sébastien Hulo","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) has published new reference equations for static lung volumes (GLI-2021). Many learned societies recommend the use of GLI reference values for interpreting pulmonary function tests (PFT), while pointing out the need for clinicians to be aware of the consequences for their routine practice. We aimed to compare the GLI-2021 reference values and the 1993 European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) standards on the interpretation of static lung volume data in patients with a probable static hyperinflation or a probable restrictive ventilatory disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed plethysmographic PFT data from 2 groups of patients: a group of patients with symptoms compatible with chronic bronchitis (CB) and a group of patients with symptoms compatible with interstitial lung disease (ILD). We investigated discrepancies in the evaluations of static lung volumes when using the ECSC vs. the GLI-2021 reference values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,897 sets of PFT results (including 1,598 in men) were included. In the CB group, the proportion of hyperinflation was higher for both sexes with the GLI-2021 standards. In the ILD group, the proportion of restrictive ventilatory disorders was higher in women but lower in men with the GLI-2021 standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A move from use of the ECSC standards for static lung volumes to the GLI-2021 standards might lead to a higher estimated proportion of hyperinflation (particularly in participants with CB), together with changes in the proportion of restrictive ventilatory disorders (a lower value in men and a higher value in women with ILD).</p>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"107988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2021, the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) has published new reference equations for static lung volumes (GLI-2021). Many learned societies recommend the use of GLI reference values for interpreting pulmonary function tests (PFT), while pointing out the need for clinicians to be aware of the consequences for their routine practice. We aimed to compare the GLI-2021 reference values and the 1993 European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) standards on the interpretation of static lung volume data in patients with a probable static hyperinflation or a probable restrictive ventilatory disorder.

Methods: We analyzed plethysmographic PFT data from 2 groups of patients: a group of patients with symptoms compatible with chronic bronchitis (CB) and a group of patients with symptoms compatible with interstitial lung disease (ILD). We investigated discrepancies in the evaluations of static lung volumes when using the ECSC vs. the GLI-2021 reference values.

Results: 2,897 sets of PFT results (including 1,598 in men) were included. In the CB group, the proportion of hyperinflation was higher for both sexes with the GLI-2021 standards. In the ILD group, the proportion of restrictive ventilatory disorders was higher in women but lower in men with the GLI-2021 standards.

Conclusion: A move from use of the ECSC standards for static lung volumes to the GLI-2021 standards might lead to a higher estimated proportion of hyperinflation (particularly in participants with CB), together with changes in the proportion of restrictive ventilatory disorders (a lower value in men and a higher value in women with ILD).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients on Azathioprine Compared to Mycophenolate. Association between the triglyceride-glucose index and mortality in the asthma population. Comparison of GLI-2021 standards with ECSC standards for static lung volume interpretation in patients with respiratory diseases. Home noninvasive ventilation in pediatric patients: Does one size fit all? Diagnostic and prognostic implications of a deep suprasternal notch in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1