Headache as the most common manifestation of giant cell arteritis?: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology International Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00296-025-05803-9
Aleksander Osiowski, Maksymilian Osiowski, Kacper Stolarz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dominik Taterra
{"title":"Headache as the most common manifestation of giant cell arteritis?: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Aleksander Osiowski, Maksymilian Osiowski, Kacper Stolarz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dominik Taterra","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05803-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the relative frequency of clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to investigate the predictors of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ) was conducted from January 1, 1990 to February 2025. Observational studies that reported original data on clinical features in patients diagnosed with GCA in accordance with 1990 ACR and/or 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were deemed for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence estimates. The study's design adhered closely to the MOOSE standards. The JBI appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The study's protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024584763).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of initial 12,628 records, 62 articles (9971 patients) met all of the eligibility criteria. Mean patients' age upon diagnosis was 74.33 years (95%CI: 74.12-74.54 years). The most prevalent clinical feature of GCA was new-onset headache (75.7%; 95CI%: 72.2-79.0; 95%PI: 0.47-0.92). Other common symptoms of GCA were temporal artery abnormalities (51.5%; 95%CI: 45.2-57.7; 95%PI: 0.25-0.77), weakness/malaise (46.7%; 95%CI: 35.4-58.4; 95%PI: 0.09-0.88), and scalp tenderness (39.1; 95%CI: 35.3-43.1; 95%PI: 0.22-0.59). Positive TAB results were present in 73.8% of patients (95%CI: 68.1-78.8%; 95%PI: 0.35-0.94). The presence of headache (LogOR = -1.11; 95%CI: -1.92 to -0.29) or PMR (-0.71; 95%CI: -1.09 to -0.32) significantly decreases the chance of receiving positive TAB results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since there is a greater likelihood of obtaining negative biopsy results, the TAB may not be required when a patient exhibits a headache along with other clinical symptoms that enable them to be diagnosed with GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05803-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the relative frequency of clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to investigate the predictors of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) outcomes.

Methods: A literature search of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ) was conducted from January 1, 1990 to February 2025. Observational studies that reported original data on clinical features in patients diagnosed with GCA in accordance with 1990 ACR and/or 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were deemed for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence estimates. The study's design adhered closely to the MOOSE standards. The JBI appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The study's protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024584763).

Results: Out of initial 12,628 records, 62 articles (9971 patients) met all of the eligibility criteria. Mean patients' age upon diagnosis was 74.33 years (95%CI: 74.12-74.54 years). The most prevalent clinical feature of GCA was new-onset headache (75.7%; 95CI%: 72.2-79.0; 95%PI: 0.47-0.92). Other common symptoms of GCA were temporal artery abnormalities (51.5%; 95%CI: 45.2-57.7; 95%PI: 0.25-0.77), weakness/malaise (46.7%; 95%CI: 35.4-58.4; 95%PI: 0.09-0.88), and scalp tenderness (39.1; 95%CI: 35.3-43.1; 95%PI: 0.22-0.59). Positive TAB results were present in 73.8% of patients (95%CI: 68.1-78.8%; 95%PI: 0.35-0.94). The presence of headache (LogOR = -1.11; 95%CI: -1.92 to -0.29) or PMR (-0.71; 95%CI: -1.09 to -0.32) significantly decreases the chance of receiving positive TAB results.

Conclusions: Since there is a greater likelihood of obtaining negative biopsy results, the TAB may not be required when a patient exhibits a headache along with other clinical symptoms that enable them to be diagnosed with GCA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头痛是巨细胞动脉炎最常见的表现吗?荟萃分析的系统综述。
目的:本研究旨在评估巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)临床特征的相对频率,并探讨颞动脉活检(TAB)结果的预测因素。方法:检索1990年1月1日至2025年2月Pubmed/Medline、Embase、ScienceDirect、Scopus、Web of Science (WoS)、Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ)的文献。根据1990年ACR和/或2022年ACR/EULAR分类标准,报告GCA患者临床特征原始数据的观察性研究被视为纳入。进行随机效应荟萃分析以确定合并的患病率估计值。该研究的设计严格遵循MOOSE标准。采用JBI评价工具评价偏倚风险。该研究方案在PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024584763)上进行了预注册。结果:在最初的12,628条记录中,62篇文章(9971例患者)符合所有资格标准。确诊时患者平均年龄为74.33岁(95%CI: 74.12-74.54岁)。GCA最常见的临床特征是新发头痛(75.7%;95 ci %: 72.2 - -79.0;95%π:0.47 - -0.92)。GCA的其他常见症状为颞动脉异常(51.5%;95%置信区间:45.2—-57.7;95%PI: 0.25-0.77),虚弱/不适(46.7%;95%置信区间:35.4—-58.4;95%PI: 0.09-0.88),头皮压痛(39.1;95%置信区间:35.3—-43.1;95%π:0.22 - -0.59)。73.8%的患者TAB阳性(95%CI: 68.1-78.8%;95%π:0.35 - -0.94)。出现头痛(LogOR = -1.11;95%CI: -1.92至-0.29)或PMR (-0.71;95%CI: -1.09至-0.32)显著降低获得阳性TAB结果的机会。结论:由于获得阴性活检结果的可能性更大,当患者表现出头痛和其他临床症状,使他们能够诊断为GCA时,可能不需要TAB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
期刊最新文献
Infrared thermography in the detection of arthritis: a systematic review of diagnostic performance compared with joint ultrasound. Correction: MRI-guided muscle biopsy improves diagnostic yield in small- to medium-vessel vasculitis: a retrospective single-center study. Calprotectin and serum amyloid A for disease activity assessment in giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: results from a prospective single-centre cohort study. Behçet's disease occurred after brodalumab initiation in a patient with chronic non-bacterial osteitis: a case-based literature review. Blood biomarkers of inflammation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor can not be used to assess the effectiveness of collagen mesotherapy in chronic cervical myofascial pain syndrome. A pilot single-blind randomized study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1