Aleksander Osiowski, Maksymilian Osiowski, Kacper Stolarz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dominik Taterra
{"title":"Headache as the most common manifestation of giant cell arteritis?: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Aleksander Osiowski, Maksymilian Osiowski, Kacper Stolarz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Dominik Taterra","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05803-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the relative frequency of clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to investigate the predictors of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ) was conducted from January 1, 1990 to February 2025. Observational studies that reported original data on clinical features in patients diagnosed with GCA in accordance with 1990 ACR and/or 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were deemed for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence estimates. The study's design adhered closely to the MOOSE standards. The JBI appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The study's protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024584763).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of initial 12,628 records, 62 articles (9971 patients) met all of the eligibility criteria. Mean patients' age upon diagnosis was 74.33 years (95%CI: 74.12-74.54 years). The most prevalent clinical feature of GCA was new-onset headache (75.7%; 95CI%: 72.2-79.0; 95%PI: 0.47-0.92). Other common symptoms of GCA were temporal artery abnormalities (51.5%; 95%CI: 45.2-57.7; 95%PI: 0.25-0.77), weakness/malaise (46.7%; 95%CI: 35.4-58.4; 95%PI: 0.09-0.88), and scalp tenderness (39.1; 95%CI: 35.3-43.1; 95%PI: 0.22-0.59). Positive TAB results were present in 73.8% of patients (95%CI: 68.1-78.8%; 95%PI: 0.35-0.94). The presence of headache (LogOR = -1.11; 95%CI: -1.92 to -0.29) or PMR (-0.71; 95%CI: -1.09 to -0.32) significantly decreases the chance of receiving positive TAB results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since there is a greater likelihood of obtaining negative biopsy results, the TAB may not be required when a patient exhibits a headache along with other clinical symptoms that enable them to be diagnosed with GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 3","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05803-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the relative frequency of clinical features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to investigate the predictors of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) outcomes.
Methods: A literature search of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Directory of Open Access journals (DOAJ) was conducted from January 1, 1990 to February 2025. Observational studies that reported original data on clinical features in patients diagnosed with GCA in accordance with 1990 ACR and/or 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were deemed for inclusion. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled prevalence estimates. The study's design adhered closely to the MOOSE standards. The JBI appraisal tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The study's protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024584763).
Results: Out of initial 12,628 records, 62 articles (9971 patients) met all of the eligibility criteria. Mean patients' age upon diagnosis was 74.33 years (95%CI: 74.12-74.54 years). The most prevalent clinical feature of GCA was new-onset headache (75.7%; 95CI%: 72.2-79.0; 95%PI: 0.47-0.92). Other common symptoms of GCA were temporal artery abnormalities (51.5%; 95%CI: 45.2-57.7; 95%PI: 0.25-0.77), weakness/malaise (46.7%; 95%CI: 35.4-58.4; 95%PI: 0.09-0.88), and scalp tenderness (39.1; 95%CI: 35.3-43.1; 95%PI: 0.22-0.59). Positive TAB results were present in 73.8% of patients (95%CI: 68.1-78.8%; 95%PI: 0.35-0.94). The presence of headache (LogOR = -1.11; 95%CI: -1.92 to -0.29) or PMR (-0.71; 95%CI: -1.09 to -0.32) significantly decreases the chance of receiving positive TAB results.
Conclusions: Since there is a greater likelihood of obtaining negative biopsy results, the TAB may not be required when a patient exhibits a headache along with other clinical symptoms that enable them to be diagnosed with GCA.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.