NutriDiary, a Smartphone-Based Dietary Record App: Description and Usability Evaluation.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.2196/62776
Linda Klasen, Stefanie Anna Julia Koch, Maike Elena Benz, Johanna Conrad, Ute Alexy, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Ionut Andone, Ute Nöthlings
{"title":"NutriDiary, a Smartphone-Based Dietary Record App: Description and Usability Evaluation.","authors":"Linda Klasen, Stefanie Anna Julia Koch, Maike Elena Benz, Johanna Conrad, Ute Alexy, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Ionut Andone, Ute Nöthlings","doi":"10.2196/62776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repeated applications of short-term dietary assessment instruments are recommended for estimating usual dietary intake. For this purpose, NutriDiary, a smartphone app for collecting weighed dietary records (WDRs) in the German population, was developed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to describe NutriDiary and evaluate its usability and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NutriDiary was developed as a WDR, allowing users to enter food items via text search, barcode scanning, or free text entry. The sample for the evaluation study included 74 participants (n=51, 69% female, aged 18-64 years), including 27 (37.5%) experts and 47 (63.5%) laypersons (including n=22, 30%, nutrition students). Participants completed a 1-day WDR and entered a predefined sample meal (n=17 foods) the following day by using NutriDiary. An evaluation questionnaire was answered from which the system usability scale (SUS) score (0-100) was calculated. A backward selection procedure (PROC REG in SAS; SAS Institute) was used to identify potential predictors for the SUS score (age, sex, status [expert or laypersons], and operating system [iOS or Android]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median SUS score of 75 (IQR 63-88) indicated good usability. Age was the only characteristic identified as a potential predictor for a lower SUS score (P<.001). The median completion time for an individual WDR was 35 (IQR 19-52) minutes. Older participants took longer to enter the data than younger ones (18-30 y: median 1.5, IQR 1.1-2.0 min/item vs 45-64 y: median 1.8, IQR 1.3-2.3 min/item). Most participants expressed a preference for NutriDiary over the traditional paper-based method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Good usability and acceptability make NutriDiary promising for use in epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e62776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/62776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Repeated applications of short-term dietary assessment instruments are recommended for estimating usual dietary intake. For this purpose, NutriDiary, a smartphone app for collecting weighed dietary records (WDRs) in the German population, was developed.

Objective: We aim to describe NutriDiary and evaluate its usability and acceptability.

Methods: NutriDiary was developed as a WDR, allowing users to enter food items via text search, barcode scanning, or free text entry. The sample for the evaluation study included 74 participants (n=51, 69% female, aged 18-64 years), including 27 (37.5%) experts and 47 (63.5%) laypersons (including n=22, 30%, nutrition students). Participants completed a 1-day WDR and entered a predefined sample meal (n=17 foods) the following day by using NutriDiary. An evaluation questionnaire was answered from which the system usability scale (SUS) score (0-100) was calculated. A backward selection procedure (PROC REG in SAS; SAS Institute) was used to identify potential predictors for the SUS score (age, sex, status [expert or laypersons], and operating system [iOS or Android]).

Results: The median SUS score of 75 (IQR 63-88) indicated good usability. Age was the only characteristic identified as a potential predictor for a lower SUS score (P<.001). The median completion time for an individual WDR was 35 (IQR 19-52) minutes. Older participants took longer to enter the data than younger ones (18-30 y: median 1.5, IQR 1.1-2.0 min/item vs 45-64 y: median 1.8, IQR 1.3-2.3 min/item). Most participants expressed a preference for NutriDiary over the traditional paper-based method.

Conclusions: Good usability and acceptability make NutriDiary promising for use in epidemiological studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Presenting AI Uncertainty Information on Pharmacists' Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: Exploratory Mixed Subjects Study. Assessing the Relationship Between the Type of Internet Use and Internet Addiction in Early and Middle Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study From Qatar. NutriDiary, a Smartphone-Based Dietary Record App: Description and Usability Evaluation. The Safety of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Findings and Recommendations From a Qualitative Study Exploring Users' Experiences, Concerns, and Suggestions. Creation of Text Vignettes Based on Patient-Reported Data to Facilitate a Better Understanding of the Patient Perspective: Design Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1