Bilateral Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondrial Approach in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

Beliz Bilgili, Ecem Güçlü Öztürk, Gamze Tanırgan Çabaklı, Gülşen Cebecik Teomete, Merve Ergenç
{"title":"Bilateral Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondrial Approach in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.","authors":"Beliz Bilgili, Ecem Güçlü Öztürk, Gamze Tanırgan Çabaklı, Gülşen Cebecik Teomete, Merve Ergenç","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal regions. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of M-TAPA in laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of M-TAPA block in patients undergoing open major abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled study. A total of 43 patients were included in the study. In group M-TAPA, the block was performed bilaterally at the end of the surgery. Local wound infiltration was performed on the control group. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled intravenous morphine. When numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded 4, rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the 24-hour total morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included comparing pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding our primary outcome, median morphine consumption during the first 24 hours was lower in the M-TAPA group [16 (14-18)] than in the control group [24.5 (19.5-27)] (<i>P</i> < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: -9, 42 and -3.01). Additionally, NRS scores were significantly lower and patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the M-TAPA group. The need for rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours was comparable among the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The M-TAPA block is an effective abdominal wall block that can be considered part of multimodal analgesia in open major abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"53 1","pages":"12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal regions. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of M-TAPA in laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of M-TAPA block in patients undergoing open major abdominal surgery.

Methods: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled study. A total of 43 patients were included in the study. In group M-TAPA, the block was performed bilaterally at the end of the surgery. Local wound infiltration was performed on the control group. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled intravenous morphine. When numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded 4, rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the 24-hour total morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included comparing pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Regarding our primary outcome, median morphine consumption during the first 24 hours was lower in the M-TAPA group [16 (14-18)] than in the control group [24.5 (19.5-27)] (P < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: -9, 42 and -3.01). Additionally, NRS scores were significantly lower and patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the M-TAPA group. The need for rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours was comparable among the study groups.

Conclusion: The M-TAPA block is an effective abdominal wall block that can be considered part of multimodal analgesia in open major abdominal surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧改良胸腹神经阻滞经硬膜周围入路治疗腹部大手术患者:一项随机单盲对照试验。
目的:改良胸腹神经阻滞术(Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach,M-TAPA)可为胸腹前部和外侧区域提供有效的镇痛。之前的研究表明,M-TAPA 在腹腔镜手术中具有很好的疗效。本研究的主要目的是调查 M-TAPA 阻滞在开腹大手术患者中的疗效:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照研究。研究共纳入 43 名患者。在 M-TAPA 组中,手术结束时进行双侧阻滞。对照组进行局部伤口浸润。术后镇痛由患者自控静脉注射吗啡。当数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分超过4分时,使用曲马多进行抢救性镇痛。本研究的主要结果是比较 24 小时吗啡总消耗量。次要结果包括疼痛评分、抢救性镇痛需求和患者满意度的比较:在主要结果方面,M-TAPA 组前 24 小时吗啡消耗量中位数[16(14-18)]低于对照组[24.5(19.5-27)](P < 0.01,95% 置信区间:-9、42 和 -3.01)。此外,M-TAPA 组的 NRS 评分明显更低,患者满意度明显更高。各研究组在最初 24 小时内对镇痛药的需求相当:结论:M-TAPA阻滞是一种有效的腹壁阻滞,可作为开腹大手术多模式镇痛的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflection on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesiology: Beyond Algorithmic Performance. Response to "Reflection on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesiology: Beyond Algorithmic Performance". Pregnancy and Motherhood Experiences of Turkish Women Anaesthesiologists in Training and Work Life. Anaesthetic Management and Multidisciplinary Approach in a Case of Aortic Foreign Body Impalement Following Thoracolumbar Instrumentation. Comparative Evaluation of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Performed in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1