Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S506043
Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey
{"title":"Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.","authors":"Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S506043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, experience inadequate disease control. Ruxolitinib cream was approved in the US in September 2021 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. This analysis describes treatment patterns before and after initiation of ruxolitinib cream among patients with AD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) and included adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with an AD diagnosis, a first claim for ruxolitinib cream (index date) between October 2021 and July 2022, and continuous enrollment in a commercial or managed Medicare plan for 6 months before and after the index date. Analyses were also conducted in a subset of patients with a history of more advanced AD therapy (ie, systemic therapies, phototherapy, or ultrahigh-potent topical corticosteroids). Data from 6 months before ruxolitinib cream initiation (baseline period) and after initiation (follow-up period) were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,581 patients in the overall AD cohort, 749 had a history of more advanced AD therapy. During the follow-up period, 43.8% of patients did not receive any other AD treatment. Compared with baseline, fewer patients received topical corticosteroids (52.3% vs 30.4%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9% vs 6.6%), and topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (4.4% vs 2.3%) during the follow-up period; slightly greater reductions were observed among the subset with a history of more advanced AD therapies. Oral corticosteroid use decreased from 20.9% to 15.5% overall and from 44.1% to 20.7% in the subset with more advanced baseline therapy. Among patients receiving biologics at baseline, 17.4% did not receive these treatments during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 6-month follow-up data suggest that initiating ruxolitinib cream for AD may reduce the overall need for other topical treatments, oral corticosteroids, and biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S506043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, experience inadequate disease control. Ruxolitinib cream was approved in the US in September 2021 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. This analysis describes treatment patterns before and after initiation of ruxolitinib cream among patients with AD.

Patients and methods: This retrospective, observational study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) and included adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with an AD diagnosis, a first claim for ruxolitinib cream (index date) between October 2021 and July 2022, and continuous enrollment in a commercial or managed Medicare plan for 6 months before and after the index date. Analyses were also conducted in a subset of patients with a history of more advanced AD therapy (ie, systemic therapies, phototherapy, or ultrahigh-potent topical corticosteroids). Data from 6 months before ruxolitinib cream initiation (baseline period) and after initiation (follow-up period) were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: Of 1,581 patients in the overall AD cohort, 749 had a history of more advanced AD therapy. During the follow-up period, 43.8% of patients did not receive any other AD treatment. Compared with baseline, fewer patients received topical corticosteroids (52.3% vs 30.4%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9% vs 6.6%), and topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (4.4% vs 2.3%) during the follow-up period; slightly greater reductions were observed among the subset with a history of more advanced AD therapies. Oral corticosteroid use decreased from 20.9% to 15.5% overall and from 44.1% to 20.7% in the subset with more advanced baseline therapy. Among patients receiving biologics at baseline, 17.4% did not receive these treatments during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: These 6-month follow-up data suggest that initiating ruxolitinib cream for AD may reduce the overall need for other topical treatments, oral corticosteroids, and biologics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开始使用 Ruxolitinib 霜前后的特应性皮炎治疗:对美国支付方索赔数据库的 6 个月随访分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy with an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor or Docetaxel in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Financial Cost of Treating Polytrauma in a Public Tertiary Hospital in the South-Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: A Case Series Study. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand. The Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Provocative Discography in the Identification of Chronic Low Back Pain Surgery Candidates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1