Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey
{"title":"Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.","authors":"Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S506043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, experience inadequate disease control. Ruxolitinib cream was approved in the US in September 2021 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. This analysis describes treatment patterns before and after initiation of ruxolitinib cream among patients with AD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) and included adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with an AD diagnosis, a first claim for ruxolitinib cream (index date) between October 2021 and July 2022, and continuous enrollment in a commercial or managed Medicare plan for 6 months before and after the index date. Analyses were also conducted in a subset of patients with a history of more advanced AD therapy (ie, systemic therapies, phototherapy, or ultrahigh-potent topical corticosteroids). Data from 6 months before ruxolitinib cream initiation (baseline period) and after initiation (follow-up period) were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,581 patients in the overall AD cohort, 749 had a history of more advanced AD therapy. During the follow-up period, 43.8% of patients did not receive any other AD treatment. Compared with baseline, fewer patients received topical corticosteroids (52.3% vs 30.4%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9% vs 6.6%), and topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (4.4% vs 2.3%) during the follow-up period; slightly greater reductions were observed among the subset with a history of more advanced AD therapies. Oral corticosteroid use decreased from 20.9% to 15.5% overall and from 44.1% to 20.7% in the subset with more advanced baseline therapy. Among patients receiving biologics at baseline, 17.4% did not receive these treatments during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 6-month follow-up data suggest that initiating ruxolitinib cream for AD may reduce the overall need for other topical treatments, oral corticosteroids, and biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S506043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, experience inadequate disease control. Ruxolitinib cream was approved in the US in September 2021 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. This analysis describes treatment patterns before and after initiation of ruxolitinib cream among patients with AD.
Patients and methods: This retrospective, observational study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) and included adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with an AD diagnosis, a first claim for ruxolitinib cream (index date) between October 2021 and July 2022, and continuous enrollment in a commercial or managed Medicare plan for 6 months before and after the index date. Analyses were also conducted in a subset of patients with a history of more advanced AD therapy (ie, systemic therapies, phototherapy, or ultrahigh-potent topical corticosteroids). Data from 6 months before ruxolitinib cream initiation (baseline period) and after initiation (follow-up period) were summarized using descriptive statistics.
Results: Of 1,581 patients in the overall AD cohort, 749 had a history of more advanced AD therapy. During the follow-up period, 43.8% of patients did not receive any other AD treatment. Compared with baseline, fewer patients received topical corticosteroids (52.3% vs 30.4%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9% vs 6.6%), and topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (4.4% vs 2.3%) during the follow-up period; slightly greater reductions were observed among the subset with a history of more advanced AD therapies. Oral corticosteroid use decreased from 20.9% to 15.5% overall and from 44.1% to 20.7% in the subset with more advanced baseline therapy. Among patients receiving biologics at baseline, 17.4% did not receive these treatments during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: These 6-month follow-up data suggest that initiating ruxolitinib cream for AD may reduce the overall need for other topical treatments, oral corticosteroids, and biologics.