Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/200195
Benjamin W Chaffee, Omara Farooq, Elizabeth T Couch, Candice D Donaldson, Nancy F Cheng, Stuart A Gansky, Xueying Zhang
{"title":"Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA.","authors":"Benjamin W Chaffee, Omara Farooq, Elizabeth T Couch, Candice D Donaldson, Nancy F Cheng, Stuart A Gansky, Xueying Zhang","doi":"10.18332/tpc/200195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco waste is a costly, widespread blight and environmental toxicant that is not distributed equally across geographical areas. This investigation reports on the prevalence of noticing tobacco litter and potential inequities in tobacco litter exposure among adolescents in California, USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the 2023 Teens, Nicotine, and Tobacco (TNT) Online Survey (N=4910), a statewide, online cross-sectional survey of California adolescents aged 12-17 years, were analyzed for the self-reported frequency of noticing tobacco product litter. All participants were asked to report how often they notice tobacco product litter (closed-ended response options: almost always, sometimes, once in a while, never). Survey-weighted multivariable regression models were fitted to quantify the odds of noticing tobacco litter 'almost always' according to participant characteristics (age, sex, gender/sexual identity, race/ethnicity, location, family finances, and own and household tobacco use). Data were weighted for geographical and demographic representativeness and response quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of noticing tobacco litter almost always was 44.6% overall and higher among participants who identified as Hispanic/Latino (50.9%) or LGBTQ+ (53.3%), lived in a small town (57.8%), or whose families were financially disadvantaged (52.7%). These inequities persisted in multivariable models, including adjustment for own and household tobacco use. For example, Hispanic/Latino participants had 1.66-times the adjusted odds of almost always noticing tobacco litter (95% CI: 1.32-2.07; reference: non-Hispanic White); the adjusted odds ratio for LGBTQ+ identity was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.04-1.87; reference: non-LGBTQ+).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pervasive exposure to tobacco litter observed in this study suggests a need for stronger efforts to reduce tobacco waste, with an emphasis on advancing equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/200195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco waste is a costly, widespread blight and environmental toxicant that is not distributed equally across geographical areas. This investigation reports on the prevalence of noticing tobacco litter and potential inequities in tobacco litter exposure among adolescents in California, USA.

Methods: Data from the 2023 Teens, Nicotine, and Tobacco (TNT) Online Survey (N=4910), a statewide, online cross-sectional survey of California adolescents aged 12-17 years, were analyzed for the self-reported frequency of noticing tobacco product litter. All participants were asked to report how often they notice tobacco product litter (closed-ended response options: almost always, sometimes, once in a while, never). Survey-weighted multivariable regression models were fitted to quantify the odds of noticing tobacco litter 'almost always' according to participant characteristics (age, sex, gender/sexual identity, race/ethnicity, location, family finances, and own and household tobacco use). Data were weighted for geographical and demographic representativeness and response quality.

Results: The prevalence of noticing tobacco litter almost always was 44.6% overall and higher among participants who identified as Hispanic/Latino (50.9%) or LGBTQ+ (53.3%), lived in a small town (57.8%), or whose families were financially disadvantaged (52.7%). These inequities persisted in multivariable models, including adjustment for own and household tobacco use. For example, Hispanic/Latino participants had 1.66-times the adjusted odds of almost always noticing tobacco litter (95% CI: 1.32-2.07; reference: non-Hispanic White); the adjusted odds ratio for LGBTQ+ identity was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.04-1.87; reference: non-LGBTQ+).

Conclusions: The pervasive exposure to tobacco litter observed in this study suggests a need for stronger efforts to reduce tobacco waste, with an emphasis on advancing equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Use of low-dose varenicline in patients who do not tolerate standard-dose varenicline: A longitudinal case series. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tobacco product consumption and behavioral patterns from a low-middle income country perspective: A qualitative study. Assessment of heated tobacco products in Cairo and Giza at points of sale: Availability, advertisement, and promotion. An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports. Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1