Social cohesion and COVID-19 mortality in different periods of the pandemic: variable efficacy of trust in civil services.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1177/14034948251314082
Ying-Chih Chuang, Rong-Xian Chen, Hsueh-Wen Hsu, Peng-Hua Lee
{"title":"Social cohesion and COVID-19 mortality in different periods of the pandemic: variable efficacy of trust in civil services.","authors":"Ying-Chih Chuang, Rong-Xian Chen, Hsueh-Wen Hsu, Peng-Hua Lee","doi":"10.1177/14034948251314082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Social cohesion has been reported to influence various health outcomes positively. However, inconsistent results were reported regarding the effects of social cohesion dimensions on the COVID-19 mortality rate (MR). Most studies have indicated that trust in civil services but not participating in social activities reduces COVID-19 mortality, possibly because of the highly contagious nature of this disease. In this study, we investigated how the effects of various dimensions of social cohesion on COVID-19 MR vary across different phases of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from 86 countries participating in the 2017-2020 World Values Survey. The measures of social cohesion were identified by aggregating responses to the country level. COVID-19 MR was calculated-using data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control-separately for three distinct periods during the pandemic: 13 January 2020-8 November 2020; 9 November 2020-5 September 2021; and 6 September 2021-20 June 2022. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the dimensions of social cohesion, and negative binomial regression models were constructed to analyze data for each period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA results revealed three dimensions of social cohesion: social participation and inclusion, health service equality, and trust in civil services and democracy. COVID-19 MR was negatively associated with trust in civil services and democracy during the early two periods and with social participation and inclusion during the late period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Each social cohesion dimension uniquely contributed to reducing the COVID-19 MR in different pandemic periods.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251314082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251314082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Social cohesion has been reported to influence various health outcomes positively. However, inconsistent results were reported regarding the effects of social cohesion dimensions on the COVID-19 mortality rate (MR). Most studies have indicated that trust in civil services but not participating in social activities reduces COVID-19 mortality, possibly because of the highly contagious nature of this disease. In this study, we investigated how the effects of various dimensions of social cohesion on COVID-19 MR vary across different phases of the pandemic.

Methods: This study used data from 86 countries participating in the 2017-2020 World Values Survey. The measures of social cohesion were identified by aggregating responses to the country level. COVID-19 MR was calculated-using data from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control-separately for three distinct periods during the pandemic: 13 January 2020-8 November 2020; 9 November 2020-5 September 2021; and 6 September 2021-20 June 2022. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify the dimensions of social cohesion, and negative binomial regression models were constructed to analyze data for each period.

Results: The EFA results revealed three dimensions of social cohesion: social participation and inclusion, health service equality, and trust in civil services and democracy. COVID-19 MR was negatively associated with trust in civil services and democracy during the early two periods and with social participation and inclusion during the late period.

Conclusions: Each social cohesion dimension uniquely contributed to reducing the COVID-19 MR in different pandemic periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Perceived infection risk, infection exposure, and compliance to infection control measures among the first COVID-19 patients in Norway. Navigating financial coverage of healthcare to undocumented migrants at two hospitals in Oslo: a qualitative study. Access to healthcare for people with intellectual disability: a scoping review. Changes in physical activity among overweight and obese Norwegian children aged 6-12: A non-randomized cluster-controlled trial. Social cohesion and COVID-19 mortality in different periods of the pandemic: variable efficacy of trust in civil services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1