Editorial Commentary: Early Postoperative Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair Is Often a Good Thing

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.059
Brian C. Werner M.D. (Editorial Board)
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Early Postoperative Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair Is Often a Good Thing","authors":"Brian C. Werner M.D. (Editorial Board)","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early postoperative stiffness after rotator cuff (RC) repair is not uncommon and can be frustrating for patients and physical therapists, as well as surgeons, as it has the potential to lengthen the recovery process, and in rare instances, can lead to additional interventions such as injections or surgery. Many risk factors for early postoperative stiffness after RC repair have been identified, including duration of immobilization and timing of rehabilitation, size of tear, preoperative stiffness, and diabetes mellitus and, according to recent research, fatty infiltration of the RC muscles. Yet, there are potential benefits to early postoperative stiffness after RC repair, as research has shown that stiffness at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively correlates with rotator cuff integrity at 6 months postoperatively, and stiffness generally resolves. At present, I do not worry about early stiffness after RC repair and do not adjust rehabilitation or intervene at an early time point except in extreme instances. I worry more about patients with extremely good motion at early time points. Future studies must focus on discerning “good” stiffness from “bad” stiffness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 8","pages":"Pages 2728-2729"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early postoperative stiffness after rotator cuff (RC) repair is not uncommon and can be frustrating for patients and physical therapists, as well as surgeons, as it has the potential to lengthen the recovery process, and in rare instances, can lead to additional interventions such as injections or surgery. Many risk factors for early postoperative stiffness after RC repair have been identified, including duration of immobilization and timing of rehabilitation, size of tear, preoperative stiffness, and diabetes mellitus and, according to recent research, fatty infiltration of the RC muscles. Yet, there are potential benefits to early postoperative stiffness after RC repair, as research has shown that stiffness at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively correlates with rotator cuff integrity at 6 months postoperatively, and stiffness generally resolves. At present, I do not worry about early stiffness after RC repair and do not adjust rehabilitation or intervene at an early time point except in extreme instances. I worry more about patients with extremely good motion at early time points. Future studies must focus on discerning “good” stiffness from “bad” stiffness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编辑评论:肩袖修复术后早期僵硬通常是一件好事。
肩袖(RC)修复后的早期术后僵硬并不罕见,这可能会让患者、物理治疗师和外科医生感到沮丧,因为它有可能延长恢复过程,在极少数情况下,可能导致额外的干预措施,如注射或手术。RC修复术后早期僵硬的许多危险因素已被确定,包括固定时间和康复时间、撕裂大小、术前僵硬和糖尿病,以及根据最近的研究,RC肌肉的脂肪浸润。然而,RC修复术后早期僵硬有潜在的好处,因为研究表明,术后6周和12周的僵硬与术后6个月的肩袖完整性相关,并且僵硬通常会消退。目前,我不担心RC修复后的早期僵硬,除了极端情况,我不会在早期时间点调整康复或干预。我更担心的是那些在早期运动非常好的病人。未来的研究必须着重于区分“好”刚度和“坏”刚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Iliopsoas Tunnel Deepening and Fractional Lengthening Relieve Painful Internal Snapping During Concomitant Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Propensity Matched Comparison. Editorial Commentary: Eight Is Enough For Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Reconstruction. Editorial Commentary: Balancing Pain Relief and Function With Iliopsoas Tendon Treatment and Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy for the Internal Snapping Hip. Editorial Commentary: Posterior Visualization in Ramp Repair: The Only Path to True Healing. Editorial Commentary: Fourteen-Year Follow-Up Shows High Overall Incidence of Osteoarthritis With Anatomic Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Perform an Anatomic Reconstruction but Also Save the Meniscus!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1