Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Mitral Annuloplasty or Replacement for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.021
Timothy J George, John J Squiers, J Michael DiMaio, Jasjit K Banwait, Paul A Grayburn, Michael J Mack, Justin M Schaffer
{"title":"Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Mitral Annuloplasty or Replacement for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Timothy J George, John J Squiers, J Michael DiMaio, Jasjit K Banwait, Paul A Grayburn, Michael J Mack, Justin M Schaffer","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retrospective studies of patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation(iMR) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) with concomitant mitral valve surgery frequently report improved survival with mitral valve annuloplasty(MVr) over replacement(MVR). However, the only randomized controlled trial found no survival difference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare claims data were queried to identify beneficiaries with iMR undergoing CABG+MVr or CABG+MVR. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival after CABG+MVr and CABG+MVR were generated, and 20-year restricted mean survival times(RMST) were compared. Then, surgeons were stratified by their rate of CABG/MVr into groups with a demonstrated preference for MVr(PA) or MVR(PR). Outcomes were re-analyzed by surgeon preference. Overlap propensity score weighting was used for risk-adjustment in all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,471 beneficiaries with iMR, 6,457(61.7%) underwent CABG+MVr and 4,014(38.3%) underwent CABG+MVR. Risk-adjusted RMSTs were 6.02[5.77,6.26] versus 5.57[5.33,5.81] years after CABG+MVr and CABG+MVR, respectively(difference 5.4[1.2,9.4] months, p=0.01). Among 1,118 surgeons, 223 PA(performed 2,191 surgeries; 89.5% MVr rate) and 235 PR(performed 1,930 surgeries; 23.0% MVr rate). Risk-adjusted RMSTs were 5.76[5.36,6.15] versus 5.77[5.40,6.14] years among beneficiaries undergoing surgery by PA surgeons and PR surgeons, respectively(difference 0.1[-6.6,6.6] months, p=0.964).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Medicare beneficiaries with iMR undergoing CABG+MVS, CABG+MVr was associated with improved survival, even after risk-adjustment for measured confounders. This may be due to unmeasured confounding variables affecting the decision to perform MVr or MVR, such as valvular pathology and/or severity of regurgitation. After endeavoring to account for unmeasured confounders using surgeon preference as an instrumental variable, surgeons who preferred CABG+MVr or CABG+MVR achieved similar long-term survival for their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Retrospective studies of patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation(iMR) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) with concomitant mitral valve surgery frequently report improved survival with mitral valve annuloplasty(MVr) over replacement(MVR). However, the only randomized controlled trial found no survival difference.

Methods: Medicare claims data were queried to identify beneficiaries with iMR undergoing CABG+MVr or CABG+MVR. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival after CABG+MVr and CABG+MVR were generated, and 20-year restricted mean survival times(RMST) were compared. Then, surgeons were stratified by their rate of CABG/MVr into groups with a demonstrated preference for MVr(PA) or MVR(PR). Outcomes were re-analyzed by surgeon preference. Overlap propensity score weighting was used for risk-adjustment in all analyses.

Results: Among 10,471 beneficiaries with iMR, 6,457(61.7%) underwent CABG+MVr and 4,014(38.3%) underwent CABG+MVR. Risk-adjusted RMSTs were 6.02[5.77,6.26] versus 5.57[5.33,5.81] years after CABG+MVr and CABG+MVR, respectively(difference 5.4[1.2,9.4] months, p=0.01). Among 1,118 surgeons, 223 PA(performed 2,191 surgeries; 89.5% MVr rate) and 235 PR(performed 1,930 surgeries; 23.0% MVr rate). Risk-adjusted RMSTs were 5.76[5.36,6.15] versus 5.77[5.40,6.14] years among beneficiaries undergoing surgery by PA surgeons and PR surgeons, respectively(difference 0.1[-6.6,6.6] months, p=0.964).

Conclusions: In Medicare beneficiaries with iMR undergoing CABG+MVS, CABG+MVr was associated with improved survival, even after risk-adjustment for measured confounders. This may be due to unmeasured confounding variables affecting the decision to perform MVr or MVR, such as valvular pathology and/or severity of regurgitation. After endeavoring to account for unmeasured confounders using surgeon preference as an instrumental variable, surgeons who preferred CABG+MVr or CABG+MVR achieved similar long-term survival for their patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Conduit Selection in CABG surgery: Mounting RIMA Evidence is Challenging our Beliefs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Mitral Annuloplasty or Replacement for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Medicare Beneficiaries. Shipwrecks and Surgery: Lessons in Leadership, Followership, and Ethos. Patient Selection for Surgery vs. Surveillance in Moderately Dilated Ascending Aorta: Insights from Titan:SvS, an International Prospective Trial. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1