Quality improvement study of collaborative care model services at a federally qualified health center: A uniform data system-informed approach.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000955
Amber Flanigan-Bodrick, Phyllis Solomon
{"title":"Quality improvement study of collaborative care model services at a federally qualified health center: A uniform data system-informed approach.","authors":"Amber Flanigan-Bodrick, Phyllis Solomon","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidenced based approach to integrating behavioral health into primary care to improve depression outcomes. This quality improvement study explores the utility of implementing CoCM with fidelity at a federally qualified health center to improve depression remission outcomes based on Uniform Data System metrics. Uniform Data System defines depression remission as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score below 5 at 12 months ± 60 days after initial positive depression screening.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used the CoCM registry and medical record data to generate a sample of 251 patients between 2021 and 2022. PHQ-9 was employed to evaluate depression outcomes. Multiple regression and repeated measures t tests were used for hypothesis testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of almost three-quarters of women and over half African American with a mean age of 40. CoCM was associated with a 12.60-point reduction in PHQ-9 scores between enrollment and follow-up at 12 months ± 60 days. A 1-point increase in fidelity was associated with a ∼4-point lower PHQ-9 score at posttest, and 1-point increase in treatment adherence was related to a 1-point decrease. Each 25 additional days of enrollment was associated with ∼1/2 point decrease.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CoCM delivered with fidelity can support federally qualified health centers in improving depression remission rates at 12 months ± 60 days after initial positive depression screen. Fidelity, treatment adherence, length of enrollment, and time in care can positively impact outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate additional study variables including psychopharmacology, psychiatric, and medical conditions in depression outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidenced based approach to integrating behavioral health into primary care to improve depression outcomes. This quality improvement study explores the utility of implementing CoCM with fidelity at a federally qualified health center to improve depression remission outcomes based on Uniform Data System metrics. Uniform Data System defines depression remission as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score below 5 at 12 months ± 60 days after initial positive depression screening.

Method: This study used the CoCM registry and medical record data to generate a sample of 251 patients between 2021 and 2022. PHQ-9 was employed to evaluate depression outcomes. Multiple regression and repeated measures t tests were used for hypothesis testing.

Results: The sample consisted of almost three-quarters of women and over half African American with a mean age of 40. CoCM was associated with a 12.60-point reduction in PHQ-9 scores between enrollment and follow-up at 12 months ± 60 days. A 1-point increase in fidelity was associated with a ∼4-point lower PHQ-9 score at posttest, and 1-point increase in treatment adherence was related to a 1-point decrease. Each 25 additional days of enrollment was associated with ∼1/2 point decrease.

Discussion: CoCM delivered with fidelity can support federally qualified health centers in improving depression remission rates at 12 months ± 60 days after initial positive depression screen. Fidelity, treatment adherence, length of enrollment, and time in care can positively impact outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate additional study variables including psychopharmacology, psychiatric, and medical conditions in depression outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Cross-disciplinary training in delivery of integrated geriatric mental health care: A pilot study. Predicting health-related quality of life in Iranian married couples: The role of family functioning, spirituality, and gender. Quality improvement study of collaborative care model services at a federally qualified health center: A uniform data system-informed approach. The impact of a caregiver's chronic illness on childhood psychosocial functioning. "Learning from those who know the system inside and out": Experiences of physician mothers who are informal caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1