Outcomes of the ROSE Sustainment (ROSES) Study, a sequential multiple assignment randomized implementation trial to determine the minimum necessary intervention to sustain a postpartum depression prevention program in agencies serving low-income pregnant people.

IF 13.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Implementation Science Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s13012-025-01420-z
Jennifer E Johnson, Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman, Alla Sikorskii, Ted Miller, Ellen Poleshuck, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Laura Carravallah, Raven Miller, Caron Zlotnick
{"title":"Outcomes of the ROSE Sustainment (ROSES) Study, a sequential multiple assignment randomized implementation trial to determine the minimum necessary intervention to sustain a postpartum depression prevention program in agencies serving low-income pregnant people.","authors":"Jennifer E Johnson, Shannon Wiltsey-Stirman, Alla Sikorskii, Ted Miller, Ellen Poleshuck, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Laura Carravallah, Raven Miller, Caron Zlotnick","doi":"10.1186/s13012-025-01420-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) was conducted to determine minimum implementation support needed for agencies serving pregnant people on public assistance to adopt and sustain the ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for mothers of newborns) postpartum depression (PPD) prevention program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled prenatal agencies (N=98) received thorough initial implementation support (initial training + written sustainment planning). Agencies were identified as at risk for non-sustainment within the first 15 months (N=56) were randomized to: (1) no additional implementation support (N=12), or (2) quarterly implementation support (coaching and feedback; N=44). If agencies receiving quarterly implementation supports were still at risk and within the first 15 months (N=29), they were randomized to: (1) continued quarterly support (N=14), or (2) monthly implementation support (N=15). No implementation support occurred after 18 months. Follow-ups occurred quarterly and then at 18, 24, and 30 months. Outcomes included sustainment of core program elements, agency PPD rates, reach, and costs/cost-effectiveness of each sustainment step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twice as many agencies as expected (41 of 98; 42%) delivered ROSE with fidelity for 15+ months after receiving thorough initial implementation support only. For agencies at risk for non-sustainment, no effects of adding quarterly implementation supports were observed. However, adding monthly supports (versus quarterly) for agencies still at risk resulted in higher monthly percent of core ROSE elements sustained and more months ROSE was sustained with fidelity with large (Cohen's d = 0.73 and 0.80) effect sizes, and improved reach over 30 months. Many agencies did not consistently collect PPD rates, making results difficult to interpret. Mean implementation costs (including implementation support and agency staff time) per agency were $1,849 (SD $1,429) for agencies receiving initial implementation support only, $2,699 (SD $1,837) for those receiving initial and quarterly implementation support, and $4,059 (SD $1,763) for those receiving initial, quarterly, and ultimately monthly implementation support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cost of agency-wide ROSE implementation is far less than the cost of a single untreated case of PPD ($33,484). We suggest implementing ROSE through thorough training and written sustainment planning. For agencies not sustaining, adding monthly support can promote sustainment and improve reach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered June 14, 2018 at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03267563 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03267563 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01420-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) was conducted to determine minimum implementation support needed for agencies serving pregnant people on public assistance to adopt and sustain the ROSE (Reach Out, Stay Strong, Essentials for mothers of newborns) postpartum depression (PPD) prevention program.

Methods: Enrolled prenatal agencies (N=98) received thorough initial implementation support (initial training + written sustainment planning). Agencies were identified as at risk for non-sustainment within the first 15 months (N=56) were randomized to: (1) no additional implementation support (N=12), or (2) quarterly implementation support (coaching and feedback; N=44). If agencies receiving quarterly implementation supports were still at risk and within the first 15 months (N=29), they were randomized to: (1) continued quarterly support (N=14), or (2) monthly implementation support (N=15). No implementation support occurred after 18 months. Follow-ups occurred quarterly and then at 18, 24, and 30 months. Outcomes included sustainment of core program elements, agency PPD rates, reach, and costs/cost-effectiveness of each sustainment step.

Results: Twice as many agencies as expected (41 of 98; 42%) delivered ROSE with fidelity for 15+ months after receiving thorough initial implementation support only. For agencies at risk for non-sustainment, no effects of adding quarterly implementation supports were observed. However, adding monthly supports (versus quarterly) for agencies still at risk resulted in higher monthly percent of core ROSE elements sustained and more months ROSE was sustained with fidelity with large (Cohen's d = 0.73 and 0.80) effect sizes, and improved reach over 30 months. Many agencies did not consistently collect PPD rates, making results difficult to interpret. Mean implementation costs (including implementation support and agency staff time) per agency were $1,849 (SD $1,429) for agencies receiving initial implementation support only, $2,699 (SD $1,837) for those receiving initial and quarterly implementation support, and $4,059 (SD $1,763) for those receiving initial, quarterly, and ultimately monthly implementation support.

Conclusions: The cost of agency-wide ROSE implementation is far less than the cost of a single untreated case of PPD ($33,484). We suggest implementing ROSE through thorough training and written sustainment planning. For agencies not sustaining, adding monthly support can promote sustainment and improve reach.

Trial registration: Registered June 14, 2018 at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03267563 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03267563 ).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ROSE维持(ROSES)研究的结果,这是一项连续的多任务随机实施试验,旨在确定在服务于低收入孕妇的机构中维持产后抑郁预防项目所需的最低干预措施。
背景:本顺序多任务随机试验(SMART)旨在确定为接受公共援助的孕妇提供服务的机构采用和维持ROSE(伸出援手,保持坚强,新生儿母亲必需品)产后抑郁症(PPD)预防项目所需的最低实施支持。方法:入选的98家产前机构均接受全面的初始实施支持(初始培训+书面支持计划)。在前15个月内被确定有不维持风险的机构(N=56)被随机分为:(1)没有额外的实施支持(N=12)或(2)季度实施支持(指导和反馈;N = 44)。如果接受季度实施支持的机构在前15个月内仍有风险(N=29),则将其随机分为:(1)继续季度支持(N=14)或(2)每月实施支持(N=15)。18个月后没有实现支持。每季度随访一次,然后在18、24和30个月随访一次。结果包括核心项目要素的维持、机构PPD率、覆盖面和每个维持步骤的成本/成本效益。结果:机构数量是预期的两倍(98家机构中有41家;42%)在获得全面的初始实施支持后,仅在15个月以上的时间内忠实交付ROSE。对于面临无法维持的风险的机构,没有观察到增加季度执行支助的效果。然而,增加对仍处于风险中的机构的月度支持(相对于季度支持),导致核心ROSE要素维持的月度百分比更高,ROSE维持的保真度更大(Cohen’s d = 0.73和0.80),并且在30个月内提高了覆盖范围。许多机构没有持续收集PPD率,使得结果难以解释。每个机构的平均实施成本(包括实施支持和机构工作人员时间)为:仅接受初始实施支持的机构为1,849美元(sdsd $1,429),接受初始和季度实施支持的机构为2,699美元(sdsd $1,837),接受初始、季度和最终每月实施支持的机构为4,059美元(sdsd $1,763)。结论:在全机构范围内实施ROSE的成本远远低于单个未经治疗的PPD病例的成本(33,484美元)。我们建议通过全面的培训和书面的维持计划来实施ROSE。对于不能维持的机构,增加每月的支持可以促进维持和提高覆盖面。试验注册:2018年6月14日在clinicaltrials.gov注册,NCT03267563 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03267563)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
期刊最新文献
Implementation impact in the age of complexity: walking the tightrope between scientific rigour and real‑world pragmatism - Proceedings of the 2025 European Implementation Event. Study protocol for coaching and leadership in autism support settings: a cluster randomized controlled hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. Monitoring systems for public health program and policy implementation in community settings: features and suggested actions from a scoping review. Comparing two strategies to support the implementation of evidence-based practices for substance use disorders in VA's permanent supportive housing program: a protocol for a type 3 hybrid cluster-randomized controlled trial. Ready to screen implementation trial protocol: a cluster randomized implementation trial comparing a bundled implementation strategy versus a simple implementation strategy to improve intention to screen in the Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1