Attitudes toward artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare in the general population: a qualitative study.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1458685
Paulina Smoła, Iwona Młoźniak, Monika Wojcieszko, Urszula Zwierczyk, Mateusz Kobryn, Elżbieta Rzepecka, Mariusz Duplaga
{"title":"Attitudes toward artificial intelligence and robots in healthcare in the general population: a qualitative study.","authors":"Paulina Smoła, Iwona Młoźniak, Monika Wojcieszko, Urszula Zwierczyk, Mateusz Kobryn, Elżbieta Rzepecka, Mariusz Duplaga","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1458685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growth of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic solutions in healthcare is accompanied by high expectations for improved efficiency and quality of services. However, the use of such technologies can be a source of anxiety for patients whose expectations and experiences with such technology differ from medical staff's. This study assessed attitudes toward AI and robots in delivering health services and performing various tasks in medicine and related fields in Polish society.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants of diversified socio-demographic profiles. The interviewees were initially recruited for the interviews in a convenience sample; then, the process was continued using the snowballing technique. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 program (release 22.7.0). An interpretative approach to qualitative content analysis was applied to the responses to the research questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of interviews yielded three main themes: positive and negative perceptions of the use of AI and robots in healthcare and ontological concerns about AI, which went beyond objections about the usefulness of the technology. Positive attitudes toward AI and robots were associated with overall higher trust in technology, the need to adequately respond to demographic challenges, and the conviction that AI and robots can lower the workload of medical personnel. Negative attitudes originated from convictions regarding unreliability and the lack of proper technological and political control over AI; an equally important topic was the inability of artificial entities to feel and express emotions. The third theme was that the potential interaction with machines equipped with human-like traits was a source of insecurity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed that patients' attitudes toward AI and robots in healthcare vary according to their trust in technology, their recognition of urgent problems in healthcare (staff workload, time of diagnosis), and their beliefs regarding the reliability and functioning of new technologies. Emotional concerns about contact with artificial entities looking or performing like humans are also important to respondents' attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1458685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1458685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growth of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic solutions in healthcare is accompanied by high expectations for improved efficiency and quality of services. However, the use of such technologies can be a source of anxiety for patients whose expectations and experiences with such technology differ from medical staff's. This study assessed attitudes toward AI and robots in delivering health services and performing various tasks in medicine and related fields in Polish society.

Methods: 50 semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants of diversified socio-demographic profiles. The interviewees were initially recruited for the interviews in a convenience sample; then, the process was continued using the snowballing technique. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 program (release 22.7.0). An interpretative approach to qualitative content analysis was applied to the responses to the research questions.

Results: The analysis of interviews yielded three main themes: positive and negative perceptions of the use of AI and robots in healthcare and ontological concerns about AI, which went beyond objections about the usefulness of the technology. Positive attitudes toward AI and robots were associated with overall higher trust in technology, the need to adequately respond to demographic challenges, and the conviction that AI and robots can lower the workload of medical personnel. Negative attitudes originated from convictions regarding unreliability and the lack of proper technological and political control over AI; an equally important topic was the inability of artificial entities to feel and express emotions. The third theme was that the potential interaction with machines equipped with human-like traits was a source of insecurity.

Conclusions: The study showed that patients' attitudes toward AI and robots in healthcare vary according to their trust in technology, their recognition of urgent problems in healthcare (staff workload, time of diagnosis), and their beliefs regarding the reliability and functioning of new technologies. Emotional concerns about contact with artificial entities looking or performing like humans are also important to respondents' attitudes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般人群对医疗保健中人工智能和机器人的态度:一项定性研究。
背景:随着人工智能(AI)和机器人解决方案在医疗保健领域应用的增长,人们对提高服务效率和质量的期望也越来越高。然而,这些技术的使用可能会引起患者的焦虑,因为患者对这些技术的期望和体验与医务人员不同。这项研究评估了波兰社会对人工智能和机器人提供保健服务以及在医学和相关领域执行各种任务的态度。方法:对50名不同社会人口特征的参与者进行半结构化深度访谈。受访者最初是在方便样本中招募的;然后,使用滚雪球技术继续这个过程。使用MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022程序(22.7.0版本)对访谈进行转录和分析。对研究问题的回答采用了定性内容分析的解释性方法。结果:对访谈的分析产生了三个主要主题:对人工智能和机器人在医疗保健中使用的积极和消极看法,以及对人工智能的本体论担忧,这些担忧超出了对该技术有用性的反对意见。对人工智能和机器人的积极态度与对技术的总体信任度较高、充分应对人口挑战的必要性以及人工智能和机器人可以减轻医务人员工作量的信念有关。消极态度源于对人工智能的不可靠性和缺乏适当的技术和政治控制的信念;一个同样重要的话题是人工实体无法感受和表达情感。第三个主题是,与具有类似人类特征的机器的潜在互动是不安全的来源。结论:研究表明,患者对人工智能和机器人在医疗保健中的态度因其对技术的信任程度、对医疗保健中迫切问题(工作人员工作量、诊断时间)的认识以及对新技术可靠性和功能的信念而异。对与看起来或表现得像人类的人工实体接触的情感担忧,对受访者的态度也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structuring medication safety narratives: development and evaluation of the medication-related incident reports annotation scheme. Use of digital patients in clinical simulation for nursing education: a scoping review protocol. From memorization to generalization: fine-tuning large language models for biomedical term-to-identifier normalization. Identifying needs in adult rehabilitation to support the clinical implementation of robotics and allied technologies: an Italian national survey. Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1