Academic screening in middle school: Exploring bivariate and intraindividual relations in reading and math performance.

IF 1.8 School psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1037/spq0000680
Kelly N Clark, Garret J Hall
{"title":"Academic screening in middle school: Exploring bivariate and intraindividual relations in reading and math performance.","authors":"Kelly N Clark, Garret J Hall","doi":"10.1037/spq0000680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early adolescence is a pivotal time for academic development; however, the vast majority of research on reading and math development within a multitiered system of support has been conducted among elementary students. Using triannual (Fall, Winter, Spring) academic screening data, we examined the transactional development of reading and math skills among sixth and seventh grade students (<i>N</i> = 1,693) using Bayesian longitudinal structural equation modeling (SEM). We find equivocal support for four of the five types of longitudinal SEMs tested (dual-change, linear change, proportional change, latent curve with structured residuals, and random-intercepts cross-lagged models). Stable between-person differences in math and reading (i.e., latent/random intercepts) are strongly correlated regardless of the modeling approach (<i>r</i> = .70-.77), consistent extensive prior research in this area. However, correlated growth processes at the between-person level and within-person transactional relations of math and reading were inconsistent across models. We discuss the practical implications of these findings as well as the methodological issues with detecting within-person instructional response in triannual screening. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"641-655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early adolescence is a pivotal time for academic development; however, the vast majority of research on reading and math development within a multitiered system of support has been conducted among elementary students. Using triannual (Fall, Winter, Spring) academic screening data, we examined the transactional development of reading and math skills among sixth and seventh grade students (N = 1,693) using Bayesian longitudinal structural equation modeling (SEM). We find equivocal support for four of the five types of longitudinal SEMs tested (dual-change, linear change, proportional change, latent curve with structured residuals, and random-intercepts cross-lagged models). Stable between-person differences in math and reading (i.e., latent/random intercepts) are strongly correlated regardless of the modeling approach (r = .70-.77), consistent extensive prior research in this area. However, correlated growth processes at the between-person level and within-person transactional relations of math and reading were inconsistent across models. We discuss the practical implications of these findings as well as the methodological issues with detecting within-person instructional response in triannual screening. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中学学业筛选:探讨阅读和数学成绩的双变量和个体关系。
青少年早期是学术发展的关键时期;然而,在多层次支持系统中,绝大多数关于阅读和数学发展的研究都是在小学生中进行的。利用三年一次(秋季、冬季和春季)的学术筛选数据,我们使用贝叶斯纵向结构方程模型(SEM)研究了六年级和七年级学生(N = 1,693)阅读和数学技能的交易性发展。我们发现五种类型的纵向sem(双变化、线性变化、比例变化、带有结构化残差的潜在曲线和随机截距交叉滞后模型)中有四种具有模棱两可的支持。无论采用何种建模方法,数学和阅读的稳定的人之间差异(即潜在/随机截距)都具有很强的相关性(r = 0.70 - 0.77),这与该领域广泛的先前研究一致。然而,数学和阅读在人际层面和个人内部交易关系上的相关增长过程在不同模型中并不一致。我们讨论了这些发现的实际意义,以及在三年一次的筛查中检测个人教学反应的方法问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Affect and stress as mediators in the relation between learning modality and engagement. Examining trauma-informed professional development in schools: A systematic narrative review highlighting culturally responsive, antiracist, and equitable content. Incremental predictive validity and equity in universal social-emotional and behavioral health screening. Diversity representation of editorial boards from seven school psychology journals. Using the Participatory Culture-Specific Intervention Model to inform cultural adaptations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1