Assessment of fate of respiratory droplets and effectiveness of different air cleaners during outpatient consultation

IF 12.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Hazardous Materials Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137601
Haiyang Liu, Zhijian Liu, Guangpeng Yao, Zhijian Dong, Chuan Jiang, Jingwei Liu, Rui Rong, Junzhou He, Chenxing Hu, Shiyue Li, Zhenyu Liang
{"title":"Assessment of fate of respiratory droplets and effectiveness of different air cleaners during outpatient consultation","authors":"Haiyang Liu, Zhijian Liu, Guangpeng Yao, Zhijian Dong, Chuan Jiang, Jingwei Liu, Rui Rong, Junzhou He, Chenxing Hu, Shiyue Li, Zhenyu Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Outpatient departments are open daily to receive patients for consultation. Physicians face a potential risk of infection when diagnosing patients with respiratory infections. This study investigated the fate of droplets exhaled by patient speaking during consultation in a hospital consulting room (CR) using numerical simulations. The accuracy of the numerical methods was verified by on-site bioaerosol dispersion experimental data. Three relative positions (RPs) with various distances between the physician and the patient were considered according to diagnostic needs. Further, the effectiveness of four types of air cleaners was explored. The results showed that the RP significantly affected the fate of the overall droplets in the CR. More than 60% of the deposited droplets were on floors and tables. In the RP 3 case (0.6<!-- --> <!-- -->m physician-patient distance), the physician inhaled 11.1 and 13.1 times more viral copies than in the RP 1 and RP 2 cases (1.2<!-- --> <!-- -->m), respectively. For the droplets deposited on physician's surfaces, they were 8.1 and 5.4 times higher, respectively. The results also showed that regardless of RP, the ceiling-mounted AC was the most effective among the four types of ACs in reducing the droplet number in the CR and virus dose inhaled by the physician.","PeriodicalId":361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137601","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outpatient departments are open daily to receive patients for consultation. Physicians face a potential risk of infection when diagnosing patients with respiratory infections. This study investigated the fate of droplets exhaled by patient speaking during consultation in a hospital consulting room (CR) using numerical simulations. The accuracy of the numerical methods was verified by on-site bioaerosol dispersion experimental data. Three relative positions (RPs) with various distances between the physician and the patient were considered according to diagnostic needs. Further, the effectiveness of four types of air cleaners was explored. The results showed that the RP significantly affected the fate of the overall droplets in the CR. More than 60% of the deposited droplets were on floors and tables. In the RP 3 case (0.6 m physician-patient distance), the physician inhaled 11.1 and 13.1 times more viral copies than in the RP 1 and RP 2 cases (1.2 m), respectively. For the droplets deposited on physician's surfaces, they were 8.1 and 5.4 times higher, respectively. The results also showed that regardless of RP, the ceiling-mounted AC was the most effective among the four types of ACs in reducing the droplet number in the CR and virus dose inhaled by the physician.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal of Hazardous Materials 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
3059
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hazardous Materials serves as a global platform for promoting cutting-edge research in the field of Environmental Science and Engineering. Our publication features a wide range of articles, including full-length research papers, review articles, and perspectives, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of the dangers and risks associated with various materials concerning public health and the environment. It is important to note that the term "environmental contaminants" refers specifically to substances that pose hazardous effects through contamination, while excluding those that do not have such impacts on the environment or human health. Moreover, we emphasize the distinction between wastes and hazardous materials in order to provide further clarity on the scope of the journal. We have a keen interest in exploring specific compounds and microbial agents that have adverse effects on the environment.
期刊最新文献
Fate of polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics in zebrafish liver cells: Influence of protein corona on transport, oxidative stress, and glycolipid metabolism Complete solidification of landfill concentrated leachate using a minimal dosage of mayenite and its reutilization for carbonyl sulfide degradation Unveiling the dual role of calcium peroxide in enhancing green rust-catalyzed arsenite oxidation and stabilization Nanoplastic and phthalate induced stress responses in rhizosphere soil: Microbial communities and metabolic networks Assessment of fate of respiratory droplets and effectiveness of different air cleaners during outpatient consultation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1