Green remediation of REEs-contaminated soil by biodegradable chelators with optimization and risk assessment

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125841
Hongbo Li , Shiqin Long , Shoushu Wei , Qingze Chen , Xiaoju Lin , Xiaoliang Liang , Jianxi Zhu , Runliang Zhu
{"title":"Green remediation of REEs-contaminated soil by biodegradable chelators with optimization and risk assessment","authors":"Hongbo Li ,&nbsp;Shiqin Long ,&nbsp;Shoushu Wei ,&nbsp;Qingze Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoju Lin ,&nbsp;Xiaoliang Liang ,&nbsp;Jianxi Zhu ,&nbsp;Runliang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The omnipresence of rare earth elements (REEs) in the environment, driven by their extensive industrial applications and common occurrence in some weathered crusts, has raised significant concerns as emerging pollutants. Soil washing has been recognized as an effective approach to remediate REEs-contaminated soils. However, traditional washing agents frequently lead to soil acidification and salinization, adversely affecting soil microbial communities and plant growth. This study explored the use of biodegradable chelators (BCs)—specifically N,N-bis(carboxymethyl)-L-glutamic acid (GLDA), iminodisuccinic acid (ISA), and polyaspartic acid (PASP)—as alternatives for removing REEs from contaminated agricultural soils. Our findings demonstrated that the removal efficiency of REEs positively correlates with BCs concentration, liquid-to-solid ratio, and washing time, while showing a negative correlation with solution pH. Through response surface analysis, we determined the optimal parameters for the washing process, revealing that GLDA, ISA, and PASP achieved total REEs removal efficiencies of 50.8%, 40.5%, and 23.2%, respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the concentration of BCs was the primary factor influencing washing effectiveness. Moreover, washing with BCs significantly removed reducible REEs—those bound to iron/manganese oxides—thereby decreasing the mobility and bioavailability of REEs in soil. The reduction in bioavailable REEs significantly lowered the environmental risk associated with contaminated soil. Notably, the activity of soil enzymes improved post-washing with BCs, indicating a positive impact on soil health. This study provides valuable insights into the remediation of REEs-contaminated soils using BCs, with GLDA emerging as a particularly effective agent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"369 ","pages":"Article 125841"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125002143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The omnipresence of rare earth elements (REEs) in the environment, driven by their extensive industrial applications and common occurrence in some weathered crusts, has raised significant concerns as emerging pollutants. Soil washing has been recognized as an effective approach to remediate REEs-contaminated soils. However, traditional washing agents frequently lead to soil acidification and salinization, adversely affecting soil microbial communities and plant growth. This study explored the use of biodegradable chelators (BCs)—specifically N,N-bis(carboxymethyl)-L-glutamic acid (GLDA), iminodisuccinic acid (ISA), and polyaspartic acid (PASP)—as alternatives for removing REEs from contaminated agricultural soils. Our findings demonstrated that the removal efficiency of REEs positively correlates with BCs concentration, liquid-to-solid ratio, and washing time, while showing a negative correlation with solution pH. Through response surface analysis, we determined the optimal parameters for the washing process, revealing that GLDA, ISA, and PASP achieved total REEs removal efficiencies of 50.8%, 40.5%, and 23.2%, respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the concentration of BCs was the primary factor influencing washing effectiveness. Moreover, washing with BCs significantly removed reducible REEs—those bound to iron/manganese oxides—thereby decreasing the mobility and bioavailability of REEs in soil. The reduction in bioavailable REEs significantly lowered the environmental risk associated with contaminated soil. Notably, the activity of soil enzymes improved post-washing with BCs, indicating a positive impact on soil health. This study provides valuable insights into the remediation of REEs-contaminated soils using BCs, with GLDA emerging as a particularly effective agent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可生物降解螯合剂对稀土污染土壤的绿色修复及其优化与风险评估
稀土元素在环境中无处不在,由于其广泛的工业应用和在一些风化地壳中的普遍存在,已经引起了人们对新兴污染物的严重关注。土壤洗涤已被认为是修复稀土污染土壤的有效方法。然而,传统的清洗剂经常导致土壤酸化和盐碱化,对土壤微生物群落和植物生长产生不利影响。本研究探索了生物可降解螯合剂(bc)的使用,特别是谷氨酸-N,N ' -二乙酸(GLDA),亚氨基二琥珀酸(ISA)和聚天冬氨酸(PASP),作为从污染的农业土壤中去除稀土的替代品。结果表明,稀土元素的去除率与bc浓度、液固比和洗涤时间呈正相关,与溶液ph呈负相关。通过响应面分析,我们确定了洗涤工艺的最佳参数,结果表明,GLDA、ISA和PASP的总稀土元素去除率分别为50.8%、40.5%和23.2%。统计分析证实,bc浓度是影响洗涤效果的主要因素。此外,用bc洗涤会显著去除可还原性稀土(与铁/锰氧化物结合的稀土),从而降低土壤中稀土的流动性和生物利用度。生物可利用稀土元素的减少显著降低了与污染土壤相关的环境风险。值得注意的是,BCs洗涤后土壤酶活性提高,表明对土壤健康有积极影响。这项研究为使用bc修复rees污染的土壤提供了有价值的见解,GLDA是一种特别有效的剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
文献相关原料
公司名称
产品信息
阿拉丁
polyaspartic acid (PASP)
阿拉丁
iminodisuccinic acid (ISA)
阿拉丁
Glutamate-N,Na€2-diacetic acid (GLDA)
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
期刊最新文献
A pipeline for meso- and microplastic identification in aquatic systems using machine learning and hyperspectral imaging High-resolution mass spectrometry reveals escalating concentrations of organophosphate esters in Yangtze River Basin soils along the upstream-to-downstream transect Dibutyl phthalate exposure-induced AhR activation drives ferroptosis and HMGB1/TLR4-mediated inflammatory liver injury via NRF2–HO-1 signaling Sex hormone disruption induced by biodegradable plastic extracts compared with conventional plastics in H295R cells and adult male zebrafish Ambient ozone pollution degrades rice grain nutritional quality and straw feed value under field conditions in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1