Gustavo Bernardes de Figueiredo Oliveira , Rafael Amorim Belo Nunes , Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves , Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves , Victor Augusto Hamamoto Sato , Ana Heloisa Kamada Triboni , Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior , Priscila Raupp da Rosa , Maria Luz Díaz , Jose Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo , Fernando Lanas , Philip Joseph , Álvaro Avezum
{"title":"Prediction of cardiovascular risk: validation of a non-laboratory and a laboratory-based score in a Brazilian community-based cohort of the PURE study","authors":"Gustavo Bernardes de Figueiredo Oliveira , Rafael Amorim Belo Nunes , Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves , Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves , Victor Augusto Hamamoto Sato , Ana Heloisa Kamada Triboni , Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior , Priscila Raupp da Rosa , Maria Luz Díaz , Jose Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo , Fernando Lanas , Philip Joseph , Álvaro Avezum","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk scores are essential tools for implementing cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Validating risk scores considering regional diversities and disparities is critical for reducing the burden of CVD on global morbidity and mortality. We aimed to validate two cardiovascular risk scores (laboratory and non-laboratory-based) to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We validated two risk scores derived from the INTERHEART study, the non-laboratory INTERHEART risk score (NL-IHRS) and the laboratory fasting cholesterol INTERHEART risk score (FC-IHRS) using data from 4623 (urban areas) and 1415 (rural areas) participants without CVD in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study enrolled in 2004 and 2005 and followed up to September 2021. The endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. We evaluated the model performance of IHRS through c-statistic and calibration methods.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (range, 0.28–15.1 years), there were 312 cardiovascular events, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.58% per year (0.56% per year in urban versus 0.64% per year in rural areas). For the NL-IHRS, the c-statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.66–0.72) in the overall cohort, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64–0.72) in the urban cohort, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78) in the rural cohort. C-statistic values for the recalibrated FC-IHRS were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.74), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76) in the overall, urban, and rural cohorts, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this Brazilian community-based prospective cohort, both NL-IHRS and FC-IHRS-based models performed with reasonable discriminative accuracy on the risk estimation of long-term risk of major CVD. A non-laboratory-based CVD risk score may be instrumental in Brazilian communities with limited access to medical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Population Health Research Institute</span>, <span>Novartis Biociências S.A</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Risk scores are essential tools for implementing cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Validating risk scores considering regional diversities and disparities is critical for reducing the burden of CVD on global morbidity and mortality. We aimed to validate two cardiovascular risk scores (laboratory and non-laboratory-based) to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study.
Methods
We validated two risk scores derived from the INTERHEART study, the non-laboratory INTERHEART risk score (NL-IHRS) and the laboratory fasting cholesterol INTERHEART risk score (FC-IHRS) using data from 4623 (urban areas) and 1415 (rural areas) participants without CVD in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study enrolled in 2004 and 2005 and followed up to September 2021. The endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. We evaluated the model performance of IHRS through c-statistic and calibration methods.
Findings
After a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (range, 0.28–15.1 years), there were 312 cardiovascular events, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.58% per year (0.56% per year in urban versus 0.64% per year in rural areas). For the NL-IHRS, the c-statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.66–0.72) in the overall cohort, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64–0.72) in the urban cohort, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78) in the rural cohort. C-statistic values for the recalibrated FC-IHRS were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.74), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76) in the overall, urban, and rural cohorts, respectively.
Interpretation
In this Brazilian community-based prospective cohort, both NL-IHRS and FC-IHRS-based models performed with reasonable discriminative accuracy on the risk estimation of long-term risk of major CVD. A non-laboratory-based CVD risk score may be instrumental in Brazilian communities with limited access to medical resources.
Funding
Population Health Research Institute, Novartis Biociências S.A.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.