Prediction of cardiovascular risk: validation of a non-laboratory and a laboratory-based score in a Brazilian community-based cohort of the PURE study

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Lancet Regional Health-Americas Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101009
Gustavo Bernardes de Figueiredo Oliveira , Rafael Amorim Belo Nunes , Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves , Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves , Victor Augusto Hamamoto Sato , Ana Heloisa Kamada Triboni , Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior , Priscila Raupp da Rosa , Maria Luz Díaz , Jose Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo , Fernando Lanas , Philip Joseph , Álvaro Avezum
{"title":"Prediction of cardiovascular risk: validation of a non-laboratory and a laboratory-based score in a Brazilian community-based cohort of the PURE study","authors":"Gustavo Bernardes de Figueiredo Oliveira ,&nbsp;Rafael Amorim Belo Nunes ,&nbsp;Lucas Bassolli de Oliveira Alves ,&nbsp;Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves ,&nbsp;Victor Augusto Hamamoto Sato ,&nbsp;Ana Heloisa Kamada Triboni ,&nbsp;Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior ,&nbsp;Priscila Raupp da Rosa ,&nbsp;Maria Luz Díaz ,&nbsp;Jose Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo ,&nbsp;Fernando Lanas ,&nbsp;Philip Joseph ,&nbsp;Álvaro Avezum","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2025.101009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk scores are essential tools for implementing cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Validating risk scores considering regional diversities and disparities is critical for reducing the burden of CVD on global morbidity and mortality. We aimed to validate two cardiovascular risk scores (laboratory and non-laboratory-based) to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We validated two risk scores derived from the INTERHEART study, the non-laboratory INTERHEART risk score (NL-IHRS) and the laboratory fasting cholesterol INTERHEART risk score (FC-IHRS) using data from 4623 (urban areas) and 1415 (rural areas) participants without CVD in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study enrolled in 2004 and 2005 and followed up to September 2021. The endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. We evaluated the model performance of IHRS through c-statistic and calibration methods.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>After a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (range, 0.28–15.1 years), there were 312 cardiovascular events, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.58% per year (0.56% per year in urban versus 0.64% per year in rural areas). For the NL-IHRS, the c-statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.66–0.72) in the overall cohort, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64–0.72) in the urban cohort, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78) in the rural cohort. C-statistic values for the recalibrated FC-IHRS were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.74), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76) in the overall, urban, and rural cohorts, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this Brazilian community-based prospective cohort, both NL-IHRS and FC-IHRS-based models performed with reasonable discriminative accuracy on the risk estimation of long-term risk of major CVD. A non-laboratory-based CVD risk score may be instrumental in Brazilian communities with limited access to medical resources.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>Population Health Research Institute</span>, <span>Novartis Biociências S.A</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 101009"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X25000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Risk scores are essential tools for implementing cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Validating risk scores considering regional diversities and disparities is critical for reducing the burden of CVD on global morbidity and mortality. We aimed to validate two cardiovascular risk scores (laboratory and non-laboratory-based) to predict major adverse cardiovascular events in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study.

Methods

We validated two risk scores derived from the INTERHEART study, the non-laboratory INTERHEART risk score (NL-IHRS) and the laboratory fasting cholesterol INTERHEART risk score (FC-IHRS) using data from 4623 (urban areas) and 1415 (rural areas) participants without CVD in the Brazilian cohort of the PURE study enrolled in 2004 and 2005 and followed up to September 2021. The endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. We evaluated the model performance of IHRS through c-statistic and calibration methods.

Findings

After a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (range, 0.28–15.1 years), there were 312 cardiovascular events, corresponding to an incidence rate of 0.58% per year (0.56% per year in urban versus 0.64% per year in rural areas). For the NL-IHRS, the c-statistic was 0.69 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.66–0.72) in the overall cohort, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64–0.72) in the urban cohort, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78) in the rural cohort. C-statistic values for the recalibrated FC-IHRS were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.74), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67–0.75), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.64–0.76) in the overall, urban, and rural cohorts, respectively.

Interpretation

In this Brazilian community-based prospective cohort, both NL-IHRS and FC-IHRS-based models performed with reasonable discriminative accuracy on the risk estimation of long-term risk of major CVD. A non-laboratory-based CVD risk score may be instrumental in Brazilian communities with limited access to medical resources.

Funding

Population Health Research Institute, Novartis Biociências S.A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of revising MenACWY vaccination schedule for adolescents in the United States: a modelling study Corrigendum to long-term prescription opioid use following surgery in the US (2017–2022): a population-based study Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Dec 4;40:100948 The hidden crisis of incarcerated individuals during wildfires The recent trend of twin epidemic in the United States: a 10-year longitudinal cohort study of co-prescriptions of opioids and stimulants Risk and impact of stroke across 38 countries and territories of the Americas from 1990 to 2021: a population-based trends analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1