Enhancing student GAI literacy in digital multimodal composing through development and validation of a scale

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108569
Meilu Liu , Lawrence Jun Zhang , Donglan Zhang
{"title":"Enhancing student GAI literacy in digital multimodal composing through development and validation of a scale","authors":"Meilu Liu ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Donglan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is widely acknowledged that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has exerted a greater influence on EFL learners' digital multimodal composing (DMC) process. GAI focuses on creating new textual and multimodal content using large language models (LLMs), and it puts different demands on EFL learners. Although much research has been conducted on EFL learners' AI literacy in various socio-cultural contexts, more attention should now be paid to EFL learners' GAI literacy in the DMC context, a new autonomous model of literacy. It should be noted that even though some studies may concentrate on users' perceptions and experiences with GAI, which may be closely tied to GAI literacy, there lacks the development of a scale for assessing GAI literacy in DMC. Thus, this study attempted to fill these research gaps by developing and validating an applicable and generalizable instrument to measure Chinese EFL learners' multimodal GAI literacy in their DMC process. Two subsamples (n1 = 296, n2 = 294) were randomly invited to respond to the GAIDMCS, and the data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. The findings suggested that a four-factor solution with 17 items can help explain Chinese EFL learners’ GAI literacy in DMC in terms of affective learning, behavior learning, cognitive learning, and ethical learning. Our GAI literacy in DMC scale may help improve GAI education for researchers and practitioners by providing a comprehensive and plausible framework that can serve as an outline for further syllabus design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 108569"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225000160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has exerted a greater influence on EFL learners' digital multimodal composing (DMC) process. GAI focuses on creating new textual and multimodal content using large language models (LLMs), and it puts different demands on EFL learners. Although much research has been conducted on EFL learners' AI literacy in various socio-cultural contexts, more attention should now be paid to EFL learners' GAI literacy in the DMC context, a new autonomous model of literacy. It should be noted that even though some studies may concentrate on users' perceptions and experiences with GAI, which may be closely tied to GAI literacy, there lacks the development of a scale for assessing GAI literacy in DMC. Thus, this study attempted to fill these research gaps by developing and validating an applicable and generalizable instrument to measure Chinese EFL learners' multimodal GAI literacy in their DMC process. Two subsamples (n1 = 296, n2 = 294) were randomly invited to respond to the GAIDMCS, and the data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. The findings suggested that a four-factor solution with 17 items can help explain Chinese EFL learners’ GAI literacy in DMC in terms of affective learning, behavior learning, cognitive learning, and ethical learning. Our GAI literacy in DMC scale may help improve GAI education for researchers and practitioners by providing a comprehensive and plausible framework that can serve as an outline for further syllabus design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过开发和验证音阶,提高学生在数字多模态写作中的GAI素养
生成式人工智能(GAI)对英语学习者的数字多模态写作(DMC)过程产生了较大的影响。GAI侧重于使用大型语言模型(llm)创建新的文本和多模态内容,它对英语学习者提出了不同的要求。尽管对不同社会文化背景下的英语学习者的人工智能素养进行了大量研究,但现在应该更多地关注DMC背景下的英语学习者的人工智能素养,这是一种新的自主素养模式。应该指出的是,尽管一些研究可能集中于用户对GAI的感知和体验,这可能与GAI素养密切相关,但缺乏评估DMC中GAI素养的量表。因此,本研究试图通过开发和验证一种适用的、可推广的工具来测量中国英语学习者在DMC过程中的多模态GAI素养,以填补这些研究空白。随机选取两个子样本(n1 = 296, n2 = 294)对GAIDMCS进行应答,并对数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA),以检验仪器的效度和信度。研究结果表明,一个包含17个项目的四因素解决方案可以从情感学习、行为学习、认知学习和伦理学习四个方面解释中国英语学习者在DMC中的GAI素养。我们在DMC量表中的GAI素养可以为研究人员和实践者提供一个全面和合理的框架,可以作为进一步教学大纲设计的大纲,从而有助于改善GAI教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Can AI reflect public opinion? Evidence from replicating Hainmueller and Hopkins’ immigration experiment with LLMs Not seeing eye to eye: The effects of perceptual conflicts during social interactions in mixed reality The influence of cyber descriptive norms on immoral online behavior: The moderating role of moral conviction1 Engaging with cybercriminals: phases and influence strategies in ransomware negotiations When algorithms remember what employees forget: Reversing the common view that artificial intelligence (AI) workplace advisors lack context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1