Waqar Ali Shah , Qammar-un-nisa Jatoi , Ume Rabab Shah
{"title":"De-centering the anthropocentric worldview in language textbooks: A posthumanist call for discursive reparations for sustainable ELT","authors":"Waqar Ali Shah , Qammar-un-nisa Jatoi , Ume Rabab Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2025.101397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our ecosystem has suffered severe material and epistemic damages as a consequence of contemporary neoliberal forces and Eurocentric onto-epistemologies in the Anthropocene era. These epistemic damages are also visible in how ELT textbooks are designed in local contexts. Informed by posthumanism and Southern epistemology, the present study analyzes the discursive/semiotic representation of nature, environment and human-nature relations in English language textbooks in Sindh province of Pakistan – highly affected climate region in South Asia. The study used Eco-CLA and multimodality as theoretical frameworks. The findings suggest that the English textbooks fail to incorporate localized sustainable thinking as well as lack references to marginalized communities affected by deteriorating ecological conditions in Pakistan. Instead, the textbooks tend to normalize the unsustainable stories connecting learning to the physical world in an anthropocentric, aestheticized, and neoliberal consumerist manner, while disregarding nonhuman entities as sentient entities. In light of our findings, we call for posthumanist discursive reparations informed by Southern epistemologies in order to rethink the writing of textbooks in ecologically affected global regions, including Sindh – the authors’ geo-epistemic context. This requires shifting away from anthropocentric disembodied conception of world to an embodied world characterized by nonduality, co-existence, entanglement and harmony.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589825000154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our ecosystem has suffered severe material and epistemic damages as a consequence of contemporary neoliberal forces and Eurocentric onto-epistemologies in the Anthropocene era. These epistemic damages are also visible in how ELT textbooks are designed in local contexts. Informed by posthumanism and Southern epistemology, the present study analyzes the discursive/semiotic representation of nature, environment and human-nature relations in English language textbooks in Sindh province of Pakistan – highly affected climate region in South Asia. The study used Eco-CLA and multimodality as theoretical frameworks. The findings suggest that the English textbooks fail to incorporate localized sustainable thinking as well as lack references to marginalized communities affected by deteriorating ecological conditions in Pakistan. Instead, the textbooks tend to normalize the unsustainable stories connecting learning to the physical world in an anthropocentric, aestheticized, and neoliberal consumerist manner, while disregarding nonhuman entities as sentient entities. In light of our findings, we call for posthumanist discursive reparations informed by Southern epistemologies in order to rethink the writing of textbooks in ecologically affected global regions, including Sindh – the authors’ geo-epistemic context. This requires shifting away from anthropocentric disembodied conception of world to an embodied world characterized by nonduality, co-existence, entanglement and harmony.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.