The level of nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic locus of control predicting self-confidence and anxiety in clinical decision-making

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106629
İlknur Bektas , Aslı Akdeniz Kudubes , Dijle Ayar , Murat Bektas
{"title":"The level of nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic locus of control predicting self-confidence and anxiety in clinical decision-making","authors":"İlknur Bektas ,&nbsp;Aslı Akdeniz Kudubes ,&nbsp;Dijle Ayar ,&nbsp;Murat Bektas","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study examined the extent to which nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic locus of control predict self-confidence and anxiety in clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study sample was 627 undergraduate nursing students. Data were collected with the Student Introductory Information Form, Self-Regulated Learning Scale for Clinical Nursing Practice, Academic Locus of Control Scale, and Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM). Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated the predictive level of the variables on the self-confidence and anxiety scale subscale scores in clinical decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The external locus of control and learning strategies significantly explain all sub-dimensions of the self-confidence scale in clinical decision-making. The internal locus of control and learning strategies meaningfully explain the sub-dimensions of the anxiety scale in clinical decision-making using resources to obtain information, fully listening, and knowing and taking action.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Self-regulated learning levels of nursing students affect clinical decision-making. It was determined that students with an internal locus of control had higher self-confidence in clinical decision-making and lower anxiety levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 106629"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study examined the extent to which nursing students' self-regulated learning and academic locus of control predict self-confidence and anxiety in clinical decision-making.

Design

This study was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study.

Methods

The study sample was 627 undergraduate nursing students. Data were collected with the Student Introductory Information Form, Self-Regulated Learning Scale for Clinical Nursing Practice, Academic Locus of Control Scale, and Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM). Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated the predictive level of the variables on the self-confidence and anxiety scale subscale scores in clinical decision-making.

Results

The external locus of control and learning strategies significantly explain all sub-dimensions of the self-confidence scale in clinical decision-making. The internal locus of control and learning strategies meaningfully explain the sub-dimensions of the anxiety scale in clinical decision-making using resources to obtain information, fully listening, and knowing and taking action.

Conclusion

Self-regulated learning levels of nursing students affect clinical decision-making. It was determined that students with an internal locus of control had higher self-confidence in clinical decision-making and lower anxiety levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护生自我调节学习和学业控制源水平对临床决策自信和焦虑的预测作用
目的研究护生自我调节学习和学业控制源对临床决策自信和焦虑的预测作用。本研究为横断面、描述性和相关性研究。方法以627名护理专业本科生为研究对象。采用《学生介绍信息表》、《临床护理实践自我调节学习量表》、《学业控制源量表》和《护理焦虑与自信临床决策量表》(NASC-CDM)收集数据。多元线性回归分析评估了各变量对临床决策中自信和焦虑分量表得分的预测水平。结果外部控制源和学习策略对临床决策自信量表各子维度均有显著解释。内在控制源和学习策略有效地解释了焦虑量表在临床决策中的子维度:利用资源获取信息、充分倾听、了解并采取行动。结论护生自我调节学习水平影响临床决策。具有内在控制点的学生在临床决策中具有较高的自信心和较低的焦虑水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Constructing digital professionalism in the generative AI era: A qualitative study with nursing students and faculty. Insights from an interprofessional education course- a mixed methods study among novice healthcare professionals. Gender-affirming communication in nursing education: Development and preliminary validation of a CICARE-based digital microlearning system. "Is GenAI my supervisor?" Experiences of nursing undergraduates in using generative AI to assist in case study theses: A qualitative study. Nurse educators' experiences integrating artificial intelligence in teaching and practice: A descriptive phenomenological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1