Evidence-based practice enhances patient outcomes: Early pressure ulcer detection with biocapacitance technology among critically ill patients

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103950
Magda Mohamed Bayoumi , Leena Mohamed Khonji , Naseem Saeed Abdulla Ali , Marwan Kamal Altheeb , Nafeesa Abdulla Mohammed , Zohour Ibrahim Rashwan
{"title":"Evidence-based practice enhances patient outcomes: Early pressure ulcer detection with biocapacitance technology among critically ill patients","authors":"Magda Mohamed Bayoumi ,&nbsp;Leena Mohamed Khonji ,&nbsp;Naseem Saeed Abdulla Ali ,&nbsp;Marwan Kamal Altheeb ,&nbsp;Nafeesa Abdulla Mohammed ,&nbsp;Zohour Ibrahim Rashwan","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In pressure ulcers (PUs), significant tissue damage often develops beneath the skin before any visual or tactile symptoms manifest. The breakthrough technology of the SEM Scanner identifies localized micro-edema that forms at tissue depths of several millimeters up to 4 cm. This empowers critical care nurses to implement proactive preventive measures.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the effectiveness of the SEM scanner and Modified Cubbin and Jackson (MCJ) Scale risk assessment tool in predicting PU among immobile patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive comparative, longitudinal study was carried out in ICU of Government Hospitals in Bahrain. Two independent raters blindly evaluated risk of PU against MCJ Scale, and a trained critical care nurse used SEM scanner.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SEM scanner demonstrated a true positive rate of 51.6 % in predicting PU development (Δ ≥ 0.6), significantly higher than the 29.7 % prediction rate of MCJ Scale (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001(. Furthermore, 28.1 % of patients developed PUs that were not predicted by MCJ (false negatives), compared to only 6.2 % with SEM scanner. The sensitivity of SEM scanner was 89.2 %, compared to 48.6 % of MCJ. The area under the curve was 0.880 for the SEM scanner versus 0.739 for MCJ. SEM scanner identified PU risk earlier than MCJ in 188 readings (35.1 %), with an average of 3.07 ± 2.93 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The SEM scanner was effective in detecting PUs three days earlier than MCJ. The SEM canner also reported more true positives of PU and more sensitivity than MCJ scale.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><div>Investing in advanced technology by integrating a reliable, evidence-based tool such as the SEM scanner into routine ICU care protocols, along with staff training, is crucial to guide clinical decision-making, reduce the variability in skin assessment, which ultimately reduces the incidence and severity of Hospital-Acquired PUs, and enhance patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 103950"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In pressure ulcers (PUs), significant tissue damage often develops beneath the skin before any visual or tactile symptoms manifest. The breakthrough technology of the SEM Scanner identifies localized micro-edema that forms at tissue depths of several millimeters up to 4 cm. This empowers critical care nurses to implement proactive preventive measures.

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness of the SEM scanner and Modified Cubbin and Jackson (MCJ) Scale risk assessment tool in predicting PU among immobile patients in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods

A descriptive comparative, longitudinal study was carried out in ICU of Government Hospitals in Bahrain. Two independent raters blindly evaluated risk of PU against MCJ Scale, and a trained critical care nurse used SEM scanner.

Results

SEM scanner demonstrated a true positive rate of 51.6 % in predicting PU development (Δ ≥ 0.6), significantly higher than the 29.7 % prediction rate of MCJ Scale (p < 0.001(. Furthermore, 28.1 % of patients developed PUs that were not predicted by MCJ (false negatives), compared to only 6.2 % with SEM scanner. The sensitivity of SEM scanner was 89.2 %, compared to 48.6 % of MCJ. The area under the curve was 0.880 for the SEM scanner versus 0.739 for MCJ. SEM scanner identified PU risk earlier than MCJ in 188 readings (35.1 %), with an average of 3.07 ± 2.93 days.

Conclusions

The SEM scanner was effective in detecting PUs three days earlier than MCJ. The SEM canner also reported more true positives of PU and more sensitivity than MCJ scale.

Implications for Clinical Practice

Investing in advanced technology by integrating a reliable, evidence-based tool such as the SEM scanner into routine ICU care protocols, along with staff training, is crucial to guide clinical decision-making, reduce the variability in skin assessment, which ultimately reduces the incidence and severity of Hospital-Acquired PUs, and enhance patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based practice enhances patient outcomes: Early pressure ulcer detection with biocapacitance technology among critically ill patients Prevalence of chronic pain and its risk factors until one year after intensive care unit discharge. A single-center prospective observational study Intensive care nurses’ provision of culturally sensitive care through communication at the end-of-life - Letter on Berdida and Grande Navigating between the familiar and the unfamiliar: A qualitative study exploring critical care nurses’ clinical practice during early rehabilitation in the ICU Advancing nasogastric tube placement safety: A call for standardizing the verification workflow based on patient-related and contextual factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1